Dear Authors,
I am now in receipt of the second round of Reviews and, although your manuscript had been improved from the initial submission, it still requires some technical changes.
I agree with the Referee that the subject of your study is of broad interest in this area of research and I believe that it'll be of interest for the readers of AMT.
Please follow carefully the suggestions made by the Referee (see below) as they will help to further clarify some parts in the manuscript.
Best Regards,
Laura Bianco
Associate Editor AMT.

Reviewer's comments:

I reviewed the previous version of this manuscript, which I thought
made a useful, incremental contribution to this area of research. My
opinion of the revised version remains the same. I have a few minor
specific comments.

1) In relation to footnote 1 on page 2, if the authors have a suitable
reference to justify that only raindrops larger than 10 um can be
detected by UHF wind profiling radars, they should include it for
completeness.

2) In relation to equation 14 on page 5, I think that dV/dz should
represent the vertical shear of the of the horizontal wind vector
rather than of the horizontal wind speed. The authors have correctly
used the former for equation 18, page 14.

3) Use of the word "inversion" on line 8 of page 13 is confusing since
it is applied to sharp negative gradients of specific
humidity. Although the feature at 3000 m in Figure 3a does appear to
correspond to a temperature inversion (the relevant part of the q-sat
curve is obscured by the legend), the one at 4400 m in Figure 3c does
not.

4) In equations 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 12, as well as in the inline
equation on line 15 of page 4, a multiplication sign should be used to
separate the mantissa and exponent portions of the coefficients -
e.g. in equation 1, 3.73 x 10^5 should be used instead of 3.73 10^5. I
realise that there is a small gap between the two terms, but in most
cases the gap is so small that the above reads as 3.7310^5.

5) line 15 of page 6. This is the first time that the abbreviation ABL
has been used. It should be defined here rather than on page
7. Similarly, AGL should be defined on line 11 of page 7 and ASL on
line 7 of page 11.

6) In the legend for Figure 5, it is difficult to distinguish between
the shapes used for "lower layer" and "upper layer" owing to the pale
green used to illustrated them.