Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT

Volume 11, issue 3

Volumes and issues
Volumes and issues

Volume 11, issue 3

05 Mar 2018
Regional uncertainty of GOSAT XCO2 retrievals in China: quantification and attribution
Nian Bie, Liping Lei, ZhaoCheng Zeng, Bofeng Cai, Shaoyuan Yang, Zhonghua He, Changjiang Wu, and Ray Nassar
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1251–1272, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1251-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1251-2018, 2018
Short summary
05 Mar 2018
Calibration and field testing of cavity ring-down laser spectrometers measuring CH4, CO2, and δ13CH4 deployed on towers in the Marcellus Shale region
Natasha L. Miles, Douglas K. Martins, Scott J. Richardson, Christopher W. Rella, Caleb Arata, Thomas Lauvaux, Kenneth J. Davis, Zachary R. Barkley, Kathryn McKain, and Colm Sweeney
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1273–1295, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1273-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1273-2018, 2018
Short summary
05 Mar 2018
Field calibration of electrochemical NO2 sensors in a citizen science context
Bas Mijling, Qijun Jiang, Dave de Jonge, and Stefano Bocconi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1297–1312, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1297-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1297-2018, 2018
Short summary
05 Mar 2018
Shipborne Wind Measurement and Motion-induced Error Correction of a Coherent Doppler Lidar over the Yellow Sea in 2014
Xiaochun Zhai, Songhua Wu, Bingyi Liu, Xiaoquan Song, and Jiaping Yin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1313–1331, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1313-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1313-2018, 2018
Short summary
06 Mar 2018
| Highlight paper
Atmospheric QBO and ENSO indices with high vertical resolution from GNSS radio occultation temperature measurements
Hallgeir Wilhelmsen, Florian Ladstädter, Barbara Scherllin-Pirscher, and Andrea K. Steiner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1333–1346, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1333-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1333-2018, 2018
Short summary
08 Mar 2018
Reduction of ZTD outliers through improved GNSS data processing and screening strategies
Katarzyna Stepniak, Olivier Bock, and Pawel Wielgosz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1347–1361, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1347-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1347-2018, 2018
08 Mar 2018
On the distortions in calculated GW parameters during slanted atmospheric soundings
Alejandro de la Torre, Peter Alexander, Torsten Schmidt, Pablo Llamedo, and Rodrigo Hierro
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1363–1375, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1363-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1363-2018, 2018
Short summary
08 Mar 2018
Raindrop fall velocities from an optical array probe and 2-D video disdrometer
Viswanathan Bringi, Merhala Thurai, and Darrel Baumgardner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1377–1384, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1377-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1377-2018, 2018
Short summary
09 Mar 2018
Quality assessment of the Ozone_cci Climate Research Data Package (release 2017) – Part 1: Ground-based validation of total ozone column data products
Katerina Garane, Christophe Lerot, Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Tijl Verhoelst, Maria Elissavet Koukouli, Irene Zyrichidou, Dimitris S. Balis, Thomas Danckaert, Florence Goutail, Jose Granville, Daan Hubert, Arno Keppens, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Diego Loyola, Jean-Pierre Pommereau, Michel Van Roozendael, and Claus Zehner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1385–1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1385-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1385-2018, 2018
Short summary
12 Mar 2018
Light-absorption of dust and elemental carbon in snow in the Indian Himalayas and the Finnish Arctic
Jonas Svensson, Johan Ström, Niku Kivekäs, Nathaniel B. Dkhar, Shresth Tayal, Ved P. Sharma, Arttu Jutila, John Backman, Aki Virkkula, Meri Ruppel, Antti Hyvärinen, Anna Kontu, Henna-Reetta Hannula, Matti Leppäranta, Rakesh K. Hooda, Atte Korhola, Eija Asmi, and Heikki Lihavainen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1403–1416, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1403-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1403-2018, 2018
Short summary
12 Mar 2018
A simple biota removal algorithm for 35 GHz cloud radar measurements
Madhu Chandra R. Kalapureddy, Patra Sukanya, Subrata K. Das, Sachin M. Deshpande, Govindan Pandithurai, Andrew L. Pazamany, Jha Ambuj K., Kaustav Chakravarty, Prasad Kalekar, Hari Krishna Devisetty, and Sreenivas Annam
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1417–1436, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1417-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1417-2018, 2018
Short summary
14 Mar 2018
Greenhouse gas measurements from a UK network of tall towers: technical description and first results
Kieran M. Stanley, Aoife Grant, Simon O'Doherty, Dickon Young, Alistair J. Manning, Ann R. Stavert, T. Gerard Spain, Peter K. Salameh, Christina M. Harth, Peter G. Simmonds, William T. Sturges, David E. Oram, and Richard G. Derwent
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1437–1458, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1437-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1437-2018, 2018
14 Mar 2018
CALIPSO lidar calibration at 532 nm: version 4 nighttime algorithm
Jayanta Kar, Mark A. Vaughan, Kam-Pui Lee, Jason L. Tackett, Melody A. Avery, Anne Garnier, Brian J. Getzewich, William H. Hunt, Damien Josset, Zhaoyan Liu, Patricia L. Lucker, Brian Magill, Ali H. Omar, Jacques Pelon, Raymond R. Rogers, Travis D. Toth, Charles R. Trepte, Jean-Paul Vernier, David M. Winker, and Stuart A. Young
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1459–1479, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1459-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1459-2018, 2018
Short summary
15 Mar 2018
Comparison of three aerosol chemical characterization techniques utilizing PTR-ToF-MS: a study on freshly formed and aged biogenic SOA
Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Ralf Tillmann, Thorsten Hohaus, Markus Müller, Philipp Eichler, Kang-Ming Xu, Patrick Schlag, Sebastian H. Schmitt, Robert Wegener, Martin Kaminski, Rupert Holzinger, Armin Wisthaler, and Astrid Kiendler-Scharr
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1481–1500, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1481-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1481-2018, 2018
Short summary
15 Mar 2018
Adaptive selection of diurnal minimum variation: a statistical strategy to obtain representative atmospheric CO2 data and its application to European elevated mountain stations
Ye Yuan, Ludwig Ries, Hannes Petermeier, Martin Steinbacher, Angel J. Gómez-Peláez, Markus C. Leuenberger, Marcus Schumacher, Thomas Trickl, Cedric Couret, Frank Meinhardt, and Annette Menzel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1501–1514, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1501-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1501-2018, 2018
Short summary
16 Mar 2018
Information content of OCO-2 oxygen A-band channels for retrieving marine liquid cloud properties
Mark Richardson and Graeme L. Stephens
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1515–1528, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1515-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1515-2018, 2018
Short summary
19 Mar 2018
Bayesian aerosol retrieval algorithm for MODIS AOD retrieval over land
Antti Lipponen, Tero Mielonen, Mikko R. A. Pitkänen, Robert C. Levy, Virginia R. Sawyer, Sami Romakkaniemi, Ville Kolehmainen, and Antti Arola
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1529–1547, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1529-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1529-2018, 2018
Short summary
20 Mar 2018
Long open-path measurements of greenhouse gases in air using near-infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy
David W. T. Griffith, Denis Pöhler, Stefan Schmitt, Samuel Hammer, Sanam N. Vardag, and Ulrich Platt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1549–1563, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1549-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1549-2018, 2018
Short summary
22 Mar 2018
Bootstrap inversion technique for atmospheric trace gas source detection and quantification using long open-path laser measurements
Caroline B. Alden, Subhomoy Ghosh, Sean Coburn, Colm Sweeney, Anna Karion, Robert Wright, Ian Coddington, Gregory B. Rieker, and Kuldeep Prasad
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1565–1582, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1565-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1565-2018, 2018
Short summary
22 Mar 2018
Evaluation of a lower-powered analyzer and sampling system for eddy-covariance measurements of nitrous oxide fluxes
Shannon E. Brown, Steve Sargent, and Claudia Wagner-Riddle
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1583–1597, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1583-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1583-2018, 2018
Short summary
22 Mar 2018
Identification of spikes associated with local sources in continuous time series of atmospheric CO, CO2 and CH4
Abdelhadi El Yazidi, Michel Ramonet, Philippe Ciais, Gregoire Broquet, Isabelle Pison, Amara Abbaris, Dominik Brunner, Sebastien Conil, Marc Delmotte, Francois Gheusi, Frederic Guerin, Lynn Hazan, Nesrine Kachroudi, Giorgos Kouvarakis, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, Leonard Rivier, and Dominique Serça
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1599–1614, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1599-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1599-2018, 2018
22 Mar 2018
A prototype method for diagnosing high ice water content probability using satellite imager data
Christopher R. Yost, Kristopher M. Bedka, Patrick Minnis, Louis Nguyen, J. Walter Strapp, Rabindra Palikonda, Konstantin Khlopenkov, Douglas Spangenberg, William L. Smith Jr., Alain Protat, and Julien Delanoe
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1615–1637, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1615-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1615-2018, 2018
Short summary
26 Mar 2018
Impact of varying lidar measurement and data processing techniques in evaluating cirrus cloud and aerosol direct radiative effects
Simone Lolli, Fabio Madonna, Marco Rosoldi, James R. Campbell, Ellsworth J. Welton, Jasper R. Lewis, Yu Gu, and Gelsomina Pappalardo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1639–1651, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1639-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1639-2018, 2018
Short summary
26 Mar 2018
Vertical profile of tropospheric ozone derived from synergetic retrieval using three different wavelength ranges, UV, IR, and microwave: sensitivity study for satellite observation
Tomohiro O. Sato, Takao M. Sato, Hideo Sagawa, Katsuyuki Noguchi, Naoko Saitoh, Hitoshi Irie, Kazuyuki Kita, Mona E. Mahani, Koji Zettsu, Ryoichi Imasu, Sachiko Hayashida, and Yasuko Kasai
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1653–1668, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1653-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1653-2018, 2018
Short summary
26 Mar 2018
High-resolution humidity profiles retrieved from wind profiler radar measurements
Frédérique Saïd, Bernard Campistron, and Paolo Di Girolamo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1669–1688, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1669-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1669-2018, 2018
Short summary
27 Mar 2018
Atmospheric characterization through fused mobile airborne and surface in situ surveys: methane emissions quantification from a producing oil field
Ira Leifer, Christopher Melton, Marc L. Fischer, Matthew Fladeland, Jason Frash, Warren Gore, Laura T. Iraci, Josette E. Marrero, Ju-Mee Ryoo, Tomoaki Tanaka, and Emma L. Yates
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1689–1705, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1689-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1689-2018, 2018
Short summary
27 Mar 2018
A new photometric ozone reference in the Huggins bands: the absolute ozone absorption cross section at the 325 nm HeCd laser wavelength
Christof Janssen, Hadj Elandaloussi, and Julian Gröbner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1707–1723, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1707-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1707-2018, 2018
Short summary
27 Mar 2018
Flow rate and source reservoir identification from airborne chemical sampling of the uncontrolled Elgin platform gas release
James D. Lee, Stephen D. Mobbs, Axel Wellpott, Grant Allen, Stephane J.-B. Bauguitte, Ralph R. Burton, Richard Camilli, Hugh Coe, Rebecca E. Fisher, James L. France, Martin Gallagher, James R. Hopkins, Mathias Lanoiselle, Alastair C. Lewis, David Lowry, Euan G. Nisbet, Ruth M. Purvis, Sebastian O'Shea, John A. Pyle, and Thomas B. Ryerson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1725–1739, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1725-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1725-2018, 2018
Short summary
27 Mar 2018
Assessing the degree of plug flow in oxidation flow reactors (OFRs): a study on a potential aerosol mass (PAM) reactor
Dhruv Mitroo, Yujian Sun, Daniel P. Combest, Purushottam Kumar, and Brent J. Williams
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1741–1756, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1741-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1741-2018, 2018
Short summary
28 Mar 2018
The NASA Carbon Airborne Flux Experiment (CARAFE): instrumentation and methodology
Glenn M. Wolfe, S. Randy Kawa, Thomas F. Hanisco, Reem A. Hannun, Paul A. Newman, Andrew Swanson, Steve Bailey, John Barrick, K. Lee Thornhill, Glenn Diskin, Josh DiGangi, John B. Nowak, Carl Sorenson, Geoffrey Bland, James K. Yungel, and Craig A. Swenson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1757–1776, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1757-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1757-2018, 2018
Short summary
28 Mar 2018
Intra-urban spatial variability of surface ozone in Riverside, CA: viability and validation of low-cost sensors
Kira Sadighi, Evan Coffey, Andrea Polidori, Brandon Feenstra, Qin Lv, Daven K. Henze, and Michael Hannigan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1777–1792, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1777-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1777-2018, 2018
Short summary
29 Mar 2018
Uncertainty characterization of HOAPS 3.3 latent heat-flux-related parameters
Julian Liman, Marc Schröder, Karsten Fennig, Axel Andersson, and Rainer Hollmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1793–1815, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1793-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1793-2018, 2018
Short summary
29 Mar 2018
Updated SO2 emission estimates over China using OMI/Aura observations
Maria Elissavet Koukouli, Nicolas Theys, Jieying Ding, Irene Zyrichidou, Bas Mijling, Dimitrios Balis, and Ronald Johannes van der A
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1817–1832, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1817-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1817-2018, 2018
Short summary
29 Mar 2018
COCAP: a carbon dioxide analyser for small unmanned aircraft systems
Martin Kunz, Jost V. Lavric, Christoph Gerbig, Pieter Tans, Don Neff, Christine Hummelgård, Hans Martin, Henrik Rödjegård, Burkhard Wrenger, and Martin Heimann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1833–1849, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1833-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1833-2018, 2018
Short summary
CC BY 4.0