Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2995-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2995-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
22 May 2018
Research article |
| 22 May 2018
| 22 May 2018
Exploring the applicability and limitations of selected optical scattering instruments for PM mass measurement
Jie Zhang
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, University of Albany, State University of New York, NY, USA
Joseph P. Marto
Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, University of Albany, State University of New York, NY, USA
James J. Schwab
Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, University of Albany, State University of New York, NY, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 3,643 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Feb 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,116 | 1,419 | 108 | 3,643 | 432 | 90 | 116 |
- HTML: 2,116
- PDF: 1,419
- XML: 108
- Total: 3,643
- Supplement: 432
- BibTeX: 90
- EndNote: 116
Total article views: 2,727 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 May 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,661 | 968 | 98 | 2,727 | 273 | 87 | 105 |
- HTML: 1,661
- PDF: 968
- XML: 98
- Total: 2,727
- Supplement: 273
- BibTeX: 87
- EndNote: 105
Total article views: 916 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Feb 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 455 | 451 | 10 | 916 | 159 | 3 | 11 |
- HTML: 455
- PDF: 451
- XML: 10
- Total: 916
- Supplement: 159
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,643 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,415 with geography defined
and 228 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,727 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,594 with geography defined
and 133 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 916 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 821 with geography defined
and 95 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
22 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A review of experimental methods to determine bioaerosol transfer in energy recovery ventilators G. Annadurai et al. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122322
- On the techniques and standards of particulate matter sampling P. Patel & S. Aggarwal 10.1080/10962247.2022.2048129
- Direct Measurement of Aerosol Liquid Water Content: A Case Study in Summer in Nanjing, China D. Li et al. 10.3390/toxics12030164
- Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution A. Masic et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020
- Detailed Measurements of Submicron Particles from an Independence Day Fireworks Event in Albany, New York Using HR-ToF-AMS J. Zhang et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00046
- Estimation of aerosol liquid water from optical scattering instruments using ambient and dried sample streams J. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117787
- The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS) K. Ardon-Dryer et al. 10.5194/amt-15-2345-2022
- Optical measurement method of non-spherical particle size and concentration based on high-temperature melting technique L. Lu et al. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111375
- Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
- Plume analysis from field evaluations of a portable air quality monitoring system J. Marto et al. 10.1080/10962247.2020.1834010
- Experimental evaluation of the impact of ventilation on cooking-generated fine particulate matter in a Chinese apartment kitchen and adjacent room X. Xu et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123821
- Aerosol physical characterization: A review on the current state of aerosol documentary standards and calibration strategies K. Vasilatou et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106483
- Variation in gravimetric correction factors for nephelometer-derived estimates of personal exposure to PM2.5 J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.121
- A feasible experimental framework for field calibration of portable light-scattering aerosol monitors: Case of TSI DustTrak Z. Li et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113136
- Characterization of submicron aerosol particles in winter at Albany, New York X. Wei et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2021.03.004
- Calibration of DustTrak and Low-Cost Sensors and Their Application for Assessment of Inhalation Exposures to Traffic-Related PM2.5 and PM1 in Ho Chi Minh City N. Chi et al. 10.3390/atmos14101504
- Indoor air quality in California homes with code‐required mechanical ventilation B. Singer et al. 10.1111/ina.12676
- Evaluation of low-cost aerosol and gas sensors for real-time measurements of electronic cigarette exposure S. Sousan et al. 10.1080/02786826.2022.2154192
- Asthma and Particulate Matter Pollution: Insights from Health Survey and Air Quality Monitoring in the Buzzard Point, Washington, DC Neighborhood S. Hsieh et al. 10.1089/env.2020.0066
- What can we learn from nested IoT low‐cost sensor networks for air quality? A case study of PM2.5 in Birmingham, UK N. Cowell et al. 10.1002/met.2220
- Deployment of networked low-cost sensors and comparison to real-time stationary monitors in New Delhi J. Prakash et al. 10.1080/10962247.2021.1890276
- Facility for production of ambient-like model aerosols (PALMA) in the laboratory: application in the intercomparison of automated PM monitors with the reference gravimetric method S. Horender et al. 10.5194/amt-14-1225-2021
22 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A review of experimental methods to determine bioaerosol transfer in energy recovery ventilators G. Annadurai et al. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122322
- On the techniques and standards of particulate matter sampling P. Patel & S. Aggarwal 10.1080/10962247.2022.2048129
- Direct Measurement of Aerosol Liquid Water Content: A Case Study in Summer in Nanjing, China D. Li et al. 10.3390/toxics12030164
- Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution A. Masic et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020
- Detailed Measurements of Submicron Particles from an Independence Day Fireworks Event in Albany, New York Using HR-ToF-AMS J. Zhang et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00046
- Estimation of aerosol liquid water from optical scattering instruments using ambient and dried sample streams J. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117787
- The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS) K. Ardon-Dryer et al. 10.5194/amt-15-2345-2022
- Optical measurement method of non-spherical particle size and concentration based on high-temperature melting technique L. Lu et al. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111375
- Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
- Plume analysis from field evaluations of a portable air quality monitoring system J. Marto et al. 10.1080/10962247.2020.1834010
- Experimental evaluation of the impact of ventilation on cooking-generated fine particulate matter in a Chinese apartment kitchen and adjacent room X. Xu et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123821
- Aerosol physical characterization: A review on the current state of aerosol documentary standards and calibration strategies K. Vasilatou et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106483
- Variation in gravimetric correction factors for nephelometer-derived estimates of personal exposure to PM2.5 J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.121
- A feasible experimental framework for field calibration of portable light-scattering aerosol monitors: Case of TSI DustTrak Z. Li et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113136
- Characterization of submicron aerosol particles in winter at Albany, New York X. Wei et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2021.03.004
- Calibration of DustTrak and Low-Cost Sensors and Their Application for Assessment of Inhalation Exposures to Traffic-Related PM2.5 and PM1 in Ho Chi Minh City N. Chi et al. 10.3390/atmos14101504
- Indoor air quality in California homes with code‐required mechanical ventilation B. Singer et al. 10.1111/ina.12676
- Evaluation of low-cost aerosol and gas sensors for real-time measurements of electronic cigarette exposure S. Sousan et al. 10.1080/02786826.2022.2154192
- Asthma and Particulate Matter Pollution: Insights from Health Survey and Air Quality Monitoring in the Buzzard Point, Washington, DC Neighborhood S. Hsieh et al. 10.1089/env.2020.0066
- What can we learn from nested IoT low‐cost sensor networks for air quality? A case study of PM2.5 in Birmingham, UK N. Cowell et al. 10.1002/met.2220
- Deployment of networked low-cost sensors and comparison to real-time stationary monitors in New Delhi J. Prakash et al. 10.1080/10962247.2021.1890276
- Facility for production of ambient-like model aerosols (PALMA) in the laboratory: application in the intercomparison of automated PM monitors with the reference gravimetric method S. Horender et al. 10.5194/amt-14-1225-2021
Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Short summary
The performance of two kinds of optical instruments for aerosol mass measurements was explained by a Mie scattering theory. At the same time, the response of optical instruments for ambient aerosol with different size, chemical composition, and refractive index were also studied. These would help evaluate the applicability and limitations of these optical scattering instruments.
The performance of two kinds of optical instruments for aerosol mass measurements was explained...
