Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2995-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2995-2018
Research article
 | 
22 May 2018
Research article |  | 22 May 2018

Exploring the applicability and limitations of selected optical scattering instruments for PM mass measurement

Jie Zhang, Joseph P. Marto, and James J. Schwab

Related authors

Technical note: Quantified organic aerosol subsaturated hygroscopicity by a simple optical scatter monitor system through field measurements
Jie Zhang, Tianyu Zhu, Alexandra Catena, Yaowei Li, Margaret J. Schwab, Pengfei Liu, Akua Asa-Awuku, and James Schwab
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13445–13456, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13445-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13445-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterization of black carbon-containing fine particles in Beijing during wintertime
Junfeng Wang, Dantong Liu, Xinlei Ge, Yangzhou Wu, Fuzhen Shen, Mindong Chen, Jian Zhao, Conghui Xie, Qingqing Wang, Weiqi Xu, Jie Zhang, Jianlin Hu, James Allan, Rutambhara Joshi, Pingqing Fu, Hugh Coe, and Yele Sun
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 447–458, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-447-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-447-2019, 2019
Short summary
Fine particles from Independence Day fireworks events: chemical characterization and source apportionment
Jie Zhang, Sara Lance, Jeffrey M. Freedman, Yele Sun, Brian A. Crandall, Xiuli Wei, and James J. Schwab
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-529,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-529, 2018
Preprint retracted
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Calibration of PurpleAir low-cost particulate matter sensors: model development for air quality under high relative humidity conditions
Martine E. Mathieu-Campbell, Chuqi Guo, Andrew P. Grieshop, and Jennifer Richmond-Bryant
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6735–6749, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6735-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6735-2024, 2024
Short summary
Testing ion exchange resin for quantifying bulk and throughfall deposition of macro- and micro-elements in forests
Marleen A. E. Vos, Wim de Vries, G. F. (Ciska) Veen, Marcel R. Hoosbeek, and Frank J. Sterck
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6579–6594, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6579-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6579-2024, 2024
Short summary
Classification accuracy and compatibility across devices of a new Rapid-E+ flow cytometer
Branko Sikoparija, Predrag Matavulj, Isidora Simovic, Predrag Radisic, Sanja Brdar, Vladan Minic, Danijela Tesendic, Evgeny Kadantsev, Julia Palamarchuk, and Mikhail Sofiev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5051–5070, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5051-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5051-2024, 2024
Short summary
A 2-year intercomparison of three methods for measuring black carbon concentration at a high-altitude research station in Europe
Sarah Tinorua, Cyrielle Denjean, Pierre Nabat, Véronique Pont, Mathilde Arnaud, Thierry Bourrianne, Maria Dias Alves, and Eric Gardrat
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3897–3915, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3897-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3897-2024, 2024
Short summary
The Fifth International Workshop on Ice Nucleation Phase 3 (FIN-03): Field Intercomparison of Ice Nucleation Measurements
Paul DeMott, Jessica Mirrielees, Sarah Petters, Daniel Cziczo, Markus Petters, Heinz Bingemer, Thomas Hill, Karl Froyd, Sarvesh Garimella, Gannet Hallar, Ezra Levin, Ian McCubbin, Anne Perring, Christopher Rapp, Thea Schiebel, Jann Schrod, Kaitlyn Suski, Daniel Weber, Martin Wolf, Maria Zawadowicz, Jake Zenker, Ottmar Möhler, and Sarah Brooks
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1744,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1744, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bae, M.-S., Schwab, J. J., Hogrefe, O., Frank, B. P., Lala, G. G., and Demerjian, K. L.: Characteristics of size distributions at urban and rural locations in New York, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4521–4535, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4521-2010, 2010.
Brauer, M., Amann, M., Burnett, R. T., Cohen, A., Dentener, F., Ezzati, M., Henderson, S. B., Krzyzanowski, M., Martin, R. V., Van Dingenen, R., Van Donkelaar, A., and Thurston, G. D.: Exposure assessment for estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to outdoor air pollution, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 652–660, 2011.
Chung, A., Chang, D. P., Kleeman, M. J., Perry, K. D., Cahill, T. A., Dutcher, D., McDougall, E. M., and Stroud, K.: Comparison of real-time instruments used to monitor airborne particulate matter, JAPCA J. Air Waste Ma., 51, 109–120, 2001.
Download
Short summary
The performance of two kinds of optical instruments for aerosol mass measurements was explained by a Mie scattering theory. At the same time, the response of optical instruments for ambient aerosol with different size, chemical composition, and refractive index were also studied. These would help evaluate the applicability and limitations of these optical scattering instruments.