Articles | Volume 11, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments
Tongshu Zheng
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
Michael H. Bergin
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
Karoline K. Johnson
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
Sachchida N. Tripathi
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208016, India
Shilpa Shirodkar
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208016, India
Matthew S. Landis
US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
Ronak Sutaria
Center for Urban Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India
David E. Carlson
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 10,751 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Apr 2018)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6,187 | 4,461 | 103 | 10,751 | 548 | 117 | 119 |
- HTML: 6,187
- PDF: 4,461
- XML: 103
- Total: 10,751
- Supplement: 548
- BibTeX: 117
- EndNote: 119
Total article views: 8,463 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 Aug 2018)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4,884 | 3,492 | 87 | 8,463 | 392 | 105 | 104 |
- HTML: 4,884
- PDF: 3,492
- XML: 87
- Total: 8,463
- Supplement: 392
- BibTeX: 105
- EndNote: 104
Total article views: 2,288 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Apr 2018)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,303 | 969 | 16 | 2,288 | 156 | 12 | 15 |
- HTML: 1,303
- PDF: 969
- XML: 16
- Total: 2,288
- Supplement: 156
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 10,751 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 9,797 with geography defined
and 954 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 8,463 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 7,679 with geography defined
and 784 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,288 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,118 with geography defined
and 170 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
131 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Examining the functional range of commercially available low‐cost airborne particle sensors and consequences for monitoring of indoor air quality in residences Y. Zou et al. 10.1111/ina.12621
- Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network E. Considine et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115833
- Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring - the Current State of the Technology and a Use Overview P. Buček et al. 10.2478/cdem-2021-0003
- Using a low-cost monitor to assess the impact of leaf blowers on particle pollution during street cleaning I. Costa-Gómez et al. 10.1007/s11869-019-00768-8
- The Kansas City Transportation and Local-Scale Air Quality Study (KC-TRAQS): Integration of Low-Cost Sensors and Reference Grade Monitoring in a Complex Metropolitan Area. Part 1: Overview of the Project S. Kimbrough et al. 10.3390/chemosensors7020026
- Phase-wise analysis of the COVID-19 lockdown impact on aerosol, radiation and trace gases and associated chemistry in a tropical rural environment C. Jain et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110665
- A temporally-calibrated method for crowdsourcing based mapping of intra-urban PM2.5 concentrations Z. Zheng et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122347
- Air quality during and after the Commonwealth Games 2018 in Australia: Multiple benefits of monitoring T. Kuhn et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105707
- Creating Clean Air Spaces During Wildland Fire Smoke Episodes: Web Summit Summary G. Davison et al. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.508971
- The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems M. Landis et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118165
- Long-term evaluation and calibration of three types of low-cost PM2.5 sensors at different air quality monitoring stations G. Hong et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105829
- Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
- In-car and Near-road Exposure to PM2.5 and BC C. Ma & G. Kang 10.5572/ajae.2020.14.2.146
- Concurrent assessment of personal, indoor, and outdoor PM 2.5 and PM 1 levels and source contributions using novel low‐cost sensing devices S. Lung et al. 10.1111/ina.12763
- Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring M. Badura et al. 10.1155/2018/5096540
- Response of eight low-cost particle sensors and consumer devices to typical indoor emission events in a real home (ASHRAE 1756-RP) Y. Zou et al. 10.1080/23744731.2019.1676094
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Beijing H. Mei et al. 10.3390/s20164381
- Intra–Community Scale Variability of Air Quality in the Center of a Megacity in South Korea: A High-Density Cost-Effective Sensor Network Y. Park et al. 10.3390/app11199105
- Association Between Bedroom Particulate Matter Filtration and Changes in Airway Pathophysiology in Children With Asthma X. Cui et al. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0140
- Sensors and Analytical Technologies for Air Quality: Particulate Matters and Bioaerosols X. Su et al. 10.1002/asia.202001051
- Validation of Low-Cost Sensors in Measuring Real-Time PM10 Concentrations at Two Sites in Delhi National Capital Region R. Sahu et al. 10.3390/s20051347
- Oral cavity response to air pollutant exposure and association with pulmonary inflammation and symptoms in asthmatic children L. He et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112275
- Low-cost sensors for measuring airborne particulate matter: Field evaluation and calibration at a South-Eastern European site G. Kosmopoulos et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141396
- Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale J. Bi et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06046
- Evaluation and calibration of a low-cost particle sensor in ambient conditions using machine-learning methods M. Si et al. 10.5194/amt-13-1693-2020
- Use of low-cost PM monitors and a multi-wavelength aethalometer to characterize PM2.5 in the Yakama Nation reservation O. Stampfer et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117292
- Measurement and Monitoring of Particulate Matter in Construction Sites: Guidelines for Gravimetric Approach I. Araújo & D. Costa 10.3390/su14010558
- Estimation of aerosol liquid water from optical scattering instruments using ambient and dried sample streams J. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117787
- Assessment and Improvement of Two Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor Systems by Using Spatial Interpolation Data from Air Quality Monitoring Stations C. Liang & P. Yu 10.3390/atmos12030300
- Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration F. Concas et al. 10.1145/3446005
- Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors: One-Year Field Comparative Measurement of Different Gas Sensors and Particle Counters with Reference Monitors at Tušimice Observatory P. Bauerová et al. 10.3390/atmos11050492
- From air quality sensors to sensor networks: Things we need to learn Y. Li et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130958
- Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile M. Tagle et al. 10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4
- Insights about the Sources of PM2.5 in an Urban Area from Measurements of a Low-Cost Sensor Network G. Kosmopoulos et al. 10.3390/atmos13030440
- From low-cost sensors to high-quality data: A summary of challenges and best practices for effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors M. Giordano et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833
- Fine particle mass monitoring with low-cost sensors: Corrections and long-term performance evaluation C. Malings et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1623863
- How to Get the Best from Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors: Guidelines and Practical Recommendations E. Brattich et al. 10.3390/s20113073
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost PM Sensors (Purple Air PA-II) Under Variable Urban Air Quality Conditions, in Greece I. Stavroulas et al. 10.3390/atmos11090926
- Performance and Deployment of Low-Cost Particle Sensor Units to Monitor Biomass Burning Events and Their Application in an Educational Initiative F. Reisen et al. 10.3390/s21217206
- A low-cost monitor for simultaneous measurement of fine particulate matter and aerosol optical depth – Part 3: Automation and design improvements E. Wendt et al. 10.5194/amt-14-6023-2021
- Laboratory and field evaluation of real-time and near real-time PM2.5 smoke monitors A. Mehadi et al. 10.1080/10962247.2019.1654036
- Field Calibration and Evaluation of an Internet-of-Things-Based Particulate Matter Sensor N. Cowell et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.798485
- Development of Particle Condensation System (PCS) Sampler for Semi-continuous Measurements of Water Soluble Aerosol Chemical Composition J. Ban et al. 10.5572/KOSAE.2019.35.6.802
- Applicability of factory calibrated optical particle counters for high-density air quality monitoring networks in Ghana C. Gameli Hodoli et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04206
- Spatial and Temporal Variations in SO2 and PM2.5 Levels Around Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai'i During 2007–2018 R. Whitty et al. 10.3389/feart.2020.00036
- Children’s microenvironmental exposure to PM2.5 and ozone and the impact of indoor air filtration K. Barkjohn et al. 10.1038/s41370-020-00266-5
- Examination of monitoring approaches for ambient air pollution: A case study for India M. Brauer et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116940
- Long-term field comparison of multiple low-cost particulate matter sensors in an outdoor urban environment F. Bulot et al. 10.1038/s41598-019-43716-3
- Evaluation methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors J. Bean 10.5194/amt-14-7369-2021
- Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study M. Zusman et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105329
- Calibration of low-cost PurpleAir outdoor monitors using an improved method of calculating PM L. Wallace et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118432
- Evaluation of two collocated federal equivalent method PM2.5 instruments over a wide range of concentrations in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina G. Hagler et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2022.101374
- Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors J. Kuula et al. 10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020
- The Relocation Problem of Field Calibrated Low-Cost Sensor Systems in Air Quality Monitoring: A Sampling Bias G. Tancev & C. Pascale 10.3390/s20216198
- Tutorial: Guidelines for implementing low-cost sensor networks for aerosol monitoring N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105872
- The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136791
- Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution A. Masic et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020
- Patterns of distributive environmental inequity under different PM2.5 air pollution scenarios for Salt Lake County public schools C. Mullen et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109543
- Global Ozone (GO3) Project and AQTreks: Use of evolving technologies by students and citizen scientists to monitor air pollutants J. Ellenburg et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100048
- Publicly available low-cost sensor measurements for PM2.5 exposure modeling: Guidance for monitor deployment and data selection J. Bi et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106897
- Long-Term Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM) Sensor H. Lee et al. 10.3390/s20133617
- A data-driven approach for characterizing community scale air pollution exposure disparities in inland Southern California K. Do et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105704
- Evaluating the PurpleAir monitor as an aerosol light scattering instrument J. Ouimette et al. 10.5194/amt-15-655-2022
- Review of urban computing in air quality management as smart city service: An integrated IoT, AI, and cloud technology perspective A. Kaginalkar et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100972
- Monitoring Excess Exposure to Air Pollution for Professional Drivers in London Using Low-Cost Sensors L. Frederickson et al. 10.3390/atmos11070749
- Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al. 10.3390/s22010394
- A systematic investigation on the effects of temperature and relative humidity on the performance of eight low-cost particle sensors and devices Y. Zou et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105715
- Evaluation of nine machine learning regression algorithms for calibration of low-cost PM2.5 sensor V. Kumar & M. Sahu 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105809
- Improved PM2.5 concentration estimates from low-cost sensors using calibration models categorized by relative humidity J. Hua et al. 10.1080/02786826.2021.1873911
- Estimating Mass Concentration Using a Low-cost Portable Particle Counter Based on Full-year Observations: Issues to Obtain Reliable Atmospheric PM2.5 Data S. Ueda et al. 10.5572/ajae.2020.14.2.155
- Low-cost monitoring of atmospheric PM—development and testing C. Báthory et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114158
- Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring: Techniques, trends, and challenges L. Liang 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163
- Environmental Particulate Matter (PM) Exposure Assessment of Construction Activities Using Low-Cost PM Sensor and Latin Hypercubic Technique M. Khan et al. 10.3390/su13147797
- Low Cost Sensor Networks: How Do We Know the Data Are Reliable? D. Williams 10.1021/acssensors.9b01455
- Measurements of PM<sub>2.5</sub> with PurpleAir under atmospheric conditions K. Ardon-Dryer et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5441-2020
- The MAPM (Mapping Air Pollution eMissions) method for inferring particulate matter emissions maps at city scale from in situ concentration measurements: description and demonstration of capability B. Nathan et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14089-2021
- Role of endogenous melatonin in pathophysiologic and oxidative stress responses to personal air pollutant exposures in asthmatic children L. He et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145709
- Effects of individual ozone exposure on lung function in the elderly: a cross-sectional study in China J. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s11356-019-04324-w
- Estimating long‐term time‐resolved indoor PM 2.5 of outdoor and indoor origin using easily obtainable inputs T. Xia et al. 10.1111/ina.12905
- Extended fumigation effect on surface and boundary layer aerosol concentrations observed during solar eclipse M. Ratnam et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2020.10.003
- Assessing the sources of particles at an urban background site using both regulatory instruments and low-cost sensors – a comparative study D. Bousiotis et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4139-2021
- Bioaerosol sampling optimization for community exposure assessment in cities with poor sanitation: A one health cross-sectional study L. Rocha-Melogno et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139495
- Application of Machine Learning for the in-Field Correction of a PM2.5 Low-Cost Sensor Network W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20175002
- Characterizing outdoor infiltration and indoor contribution of PM2.5 with citizen-based low-cost monitoring data J. Bi et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116763
- Wildfire smoke impacts on indoor air quality assessed using crowdsourced data in California Y. Liang et al. 10.1073/pnas.2106478118
- Qualification of the Alphasense optical particle counter for inline air quality monitoring S. Bezantakos et al. 10.1080/02786826.2020.1864276
- Malondialdehyde in Nasal Fluid: A Biomarker for Monitoring Asthma Control in Relation to Air Pollution Exposure L. He et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c02558
- Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions H. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos11020212
- The Impacts of Prescribed Fire on PM2.5 Air Quality and Human Health: Application to Asthma-Related Emergency Room Visits in Georgia, USA R. Huang et al. 10.3390/ijerph16132312
- Domain Adaptation-Based Deep Calibration of Low-Cost PM₂.₅ Sensors S. Jha et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3118454
- Visualization of Dust Generation in Outdoor Workplaces Using A Wearable Particle Monitor and Global Navigation Satellite System S. SEKOGUCHI et al. 10.7888/juoeh.44.1
- Performance of low-cost indoor air quality monitors for PM2.5 and PM10 from residential sources Z. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106654
- Performance of a Low-Cost Sensor Community Air Monitoring Network in Imperial County, CA P. English et al. 10.3390/s20113031
- Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
- Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach D. Hagan & J. Kroll 10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020
- Performance Assessment of a Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor for a near Four-Month Period in Oslo, Norway H. Liu et al. 10.3390/atmos10020041
- Strategies of method selection for fine-scale PM<sub>2.5</sub> mapping in an intra-urban area using crowdsourced monitoring S. Xu et al. 10.5194/amt-12-2933-2019
- A Multipollutant Smoke Emissions Sensing and Sampling Instrument Package for Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Development and Testing K. Nelson et al. 10.3390/fire2020032
- Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site B. Feenstra et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116946
- Estimating the spatial variability of fine particles at the neighborhood scale using a distributed network of particle sensors R. Shafran-Nathan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117011
- Low-cost solar PV soiling sensor validation and size resolved soiling impacts: A comprehensive field study in Western India M. Valerino et al. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.118
- Predicting Photovoltaic Soiling From Air Quality Measurements S. Toth et al. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.2983990
- Using a network of lower-cost monitors to identify the influence of modifiable factors driving spatial patterns in fine particulate matter concentrations in an urban environment S. Rose Eilenberg et al. 10.1038/s41370-020-0255-x
- Evaluation of Two Low-Cost Optical Particle Counters for the Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Scattering Coefficient and Ångström Exponent K. Markowicz & M. Chiliński 10.3390/s20092617
- Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM<sub>2.5</sub> data collected with the PurpleAir sensor K. Barkjohn et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021
- Assessing Inequitable Urban Heat Islands and Air Pollution Disparities with Low-Cost Sensors in Richmond, Virginia A. Eanes et al. 10.3390/su122310089
- A new evaluation method of three different low-cost dust sensors using exponentially decaying particle concentrations K. Kang et al. 10.4491/eer.2020.501
- Community-Based Measurements Reveal Unseen Differences during Air Pollution Episodes K. Kelly et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c02341
- Demonstration of a Low-Cost Multi-Pollutant Network to Quantify Intra-Urban Spatial Variations in Air Pollutant Source Impacts and to Evaluate Environmental Justice R. Tanzer et al. 10.3390/ijerph16142523
- Evaluation and Application of a Novel Low-Cost Wearable Sensing Device in Assessing Real-Time PM2.5 Exposure in Major Asian Transportation Modes W. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos12020270
- Effects of Road Traffic on the Accuracy and Bias of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor Measurements in Houston, Texas T. Oluwadairo et al. 10.3390/ijerph19031086
- Evaluation of a low-cost multi-channel monitor for indoor air quality through a novel, low-cost, and reproducible platform A. Baldelli 10.1016/j.measen.2021.100059
- The effects of ventilation and filtration on indoor PM2.5 in office buildings in four countries E. Jones et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107975
- Associations of personal exposure to air pollutants with airway mechanics in children with asthma L. He et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105647
- Fusion of Environmental Sensing on PM2.5 and Deep Learning on Vehicle Detecting for Acquiring Roadside PM2.5 Concentration Increments W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20174679
- Calibration of CO, NO2, and O3 Using Airify: A Low-Cost Sensor Cluster for Air Quality Monitoring M. Ionascu et al. 10.3390/s21237977
- Laboratory Evaluations of Correction Equations with Multiple Choices for Seed Low-Cost Particle Sensing Devices in Sensor Networks W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20133661
- Detection of PM2.5 plume movement from IoT ground level monitoring data T. Kanabkaew et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.082
- Personal Exposure to PM2.5 Oxidative Potential in Association with Pulmonary Pathophysiologic Outcomes in Children with Asthma L. He et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c06114
- Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al. 10.3390/atmos10090506
- Ultra-Light Airborne Measurement System for Investigation of Urban Boundary Layer Dynamics P. Sekula et al. 10.3390/s21092920
- Connecting Air Quality with Emotional Well-Being and Neighborhood Infrastructure in a US City R. Lal et al. 10.1177/1178630220915488
- Toxic volatile organic compounds in 20 homes in Shanghai: Concentrations, inhalation health risks, and the impacts of household air cleaning L. Fang et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.047
- Elemental: An Open-Source Wireless Hardware and Software Platform for Building Energy and Indoor Environmental Monitoring and Control A. Ali et al. 10.3390/s19184017
- Traceable PM2.5 and PM10 Calibration of Low-Cost Sensors with Ambient-like Aerosols Generated in the Laboratory S. Horender et al. 10.3390/app11199014
- Measurement of Air Pollution Parameters in Montenegro Using the Ecomar System N. Zaric et al. 10.3390/ijerph18126565
- Influence of particle properties and environmental factors on the performance of typical particle monitors and low-cost particle sensors in the market of China D. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118825
- Application of low-cost fine particulate mass monitors to convert satellite aerosol optical depth to surface concentrations in North America and Africa C. Malings et al. 10.5194/amt-13-3873-2020
- Advantages and challenges of the implementation of a low-cost particulate matter monitoring system as a decision-making tool V. Caquilpán P. et al. 10.1007/s10661-019-7875-4
- An experimental application of laser-scattering sensor to estimate the traffic-induced PM2.5 in Beijing X. Liu et al. 10.1007/s10661-020-08398-9
- Application and evaluation of a low-cost PM sensor and data fusion with CMAQ simulations to quantify the impacts of prescribed burning on air quality in Southwestern Georgia, USA R. Huang et al. 10.1080/10962247.2021.1924311
128 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Examining the functional range of commercially available low‐cost airborne particle sensors and consequences for monitoring of indoor air quality in residences Y. Zou et al. 10.1111/ina.12621
- Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network E. Considine et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115833
- Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring - the Current State of the Technology and a Use Overview P. Buček et al. 10.2478/cdem-2021-0003
- Using a low-cost monitor to assess the impact of leaf blowers on particle pollution during street cleaning I. Costa-Gómez et al. 10.1007/s11869-019-00768-8
- The Kansas City Transportation and Local-Scale Air Quality Study (KC-TRAQS): Integration of Low-Cost Sensors and Reference Grade Monitoring in a Complex Metropolitan Area. Part 1: Overview of the Project S. Kimbrough et al. 10.3390/chemosensors7020026
- Phase-wise analysis of the COVID-19 lockdown impact on aerosol, radiation and trace gases and associated chemistry in a tropical rural environment C. Jain et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110665
- A temporally-calibrated method for crowdsourcing based mapping of intra-urban PM2.5 concentrations Z. Zheng et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122347
- Air quality during and after the Commonwealth Games 2018 in Australia: Multiple benefits of monitoring T. Kuhn et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105707
- Creating Clean Air Spaces During Wildland Fire Smoke Episodes: Web Summit Summary G. Davison et al. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.508971
- The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems M. Landis et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118165
- Long-term evaluation and calibration of three types of low-cost PM2.5 sensors at different air quality monitoring stations G. Hong et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105829
- Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
- In-car and Near-road Exposure to PM2.5 and BC C. Ma & G. Kang 10.5572/ajae.2020.14.2.146
- Concurrent assessment of personal, indoor, and outdoor PM 2.5 and PM 1 levels and source contributions using novel low‐cost sensing devices S. Lung et al. 10.1111/ina.12763
- Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring M. Badura et al. 10.1155/2018/5096540
- Response of eight low-cost particle sensors and consumer devices to typical indoor emission events in a real home (ASHRAE 1756-RP) Y. Zou et al. 10.1080/23744731.2019.1676094
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Beijing H. Mei et al. 10.3390/s20164381
- Intra–Community Scale Variability of Air Quality in the Center of a Megacity in South Korea: A High-Density Cost-Effective Sensor Network Y. Park et al. 10.3390/app11199105
- Association Between Bedroom Particulate Matter Filtration and Changes in Airway Pathophysiology in Children With Asthma X. Cui et al. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0140
- Sensors and Analytical Technologies for Air Quality: Particulate Matters and Bioaerosols X. Su et al. 10.1002/asia.202001051
- Validation of Low-Cost Sensors in Measuring Real-Time PM10 Concentrations at Two Sites in Delhi National Capital Region R. Sahu et al. 10.3390/s20051347
- Oral cavity response to air pollutant exposure and association with pulmonary inflammation and symptoms in asthmatic children L. He et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112275
- Low-cost sensors for measuring airborne particulate matter: Field evaluation and calibration at a South-Eastern European site G. Kosmopoulos et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141396
- Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale J. Bi et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06046
- Evaluation and calibration of a low-cost particle sensor in ambient conditions using machine-learning methods M. Si et al. 10.5194/amt-13-1693-2020
- Use of low-cost PM monitors and a multi-wavelength aethalometer to characterize PM2.5 in the Yakama Nation reservation O. Stampfer et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117292
- Measurement and Monitoring of Particulate Matter in Construction Sites: Guidelines for Gravimetric Approach I. Araújo & D. Costa 10.3390/su14010558
- Estimation of aerosol liquid water from optical scattering instruments using ambient and dried sample streams J. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117787
- Assessment and Improvement of Two Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor Systems by Using Spatial Interpolation Data from Air Quality Monitoring Stations C. Liang & P. Yu 10.3390/atmos12030300
- Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration F. Concas et al. 10.1145/3446005
- Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors: One-Year Field Comparative Measurement of Different Gas Sensors and Particle Counters with Reference Monitors at Tušimice Observatory P. Bauerová et al. 10.3390/atmos11050492
- From air quality sensors to sensor networks: Things we need to learn Y. Li et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130958
- Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile M. Tagle et al. 10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4
- Insights about the Sources of PM2.5 in an Urban Area from Measurements of a Low-Cost Sensor Network G. Kosmopoulos et al. 10.3390/atmos13030440
- From low-cost sensors to high-quality data: A summary of challenges and best practices for effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors M. Giordano et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833
- Fine particle mass monitoring with low-cost sensors: Corrections and long-term performance evaluation C. Malings et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1623863
- How to Get the Best from Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors: Guidelines and Practical Recommendations E. Brattich et al. 10.3390/s20113073
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost PM Sensors (Purple Air PA-II) Under Variable Urban Air Quality Conditions, in Greece I. Stavroulas et al. 10.3390/atmos11090926
- Performance and Deployment of Low-Cost Particle Sensor Units to Monitor Biomass Burning Events and Their Application in an Educational Initiative F. Reisen et al. 10.3390/s21217206
- A low-cost monitor for simultaneous measurement of fine particulate matter and aerosol optical depth – Part 3: Automation and design improvements E. Wendt et al. 10.5194/amt-14-6023-2021
- Laboratory and field evaluation of real-time and near real-time PM2.5 smoke monitors A. Mehadi et al. 10.1080/10962247.2019.1654036
- Field Calibration and Evaluation of an Internet-of-Things-Based Particulate Matter Sensor N. Cowell et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.798485
- Development of Particle Condensation System (PCS) Sampler for Semi-continuous Measurements of Water Soluble Aerosol Chemical Composition J. Ban et al. 10.5572/KOSAE.2019.35.6.802
- Applicability of factory calibrated optical particle counters for high-density air quality monitoring networks in Ghana C. Gameli Hodoli et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04206
- Spatial and Temporal Variations in SO2 and PM2.5 Levels Around Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai'i During 2007–2018 R. Whitty et al. 10.3389/feart.2020.00036
- Children’s microenvironmental exposure to PM2.5 and ozone and the impact of indoor air filtration K. Barkjohn et al. 10.1038/s41370-020-00266-5
- Examination of monitoring approaches for ambient air pollution: A case study for India M. Brauer et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116940
- Long-term field comparison of multiple low-cost particulate matter sensors in an outdoor urban environment F. Bulot et al. 10.1038/s41598-019-43716-3
- Evaluation methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors J. Bean 10.5194/amt-14-7369-2021
- Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study M. Zusman et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105329
- Calibration of low-cost PurpleAir outdoor monitors using an improved method of calculating PM L. Wallace et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118432
- Evaluation of two collocated federal equivalent method PM2.5 instruments over a wide range of concentrations in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina G. Hagler et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2022.101374
- Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors J. Kuula et al. 10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020
- The Relocation Problem of Field Calibrated Low-Cost Sensor Systems in Air Quality Monitoring: A Sampling Bias G. Tancev & C. Pascale 10.3390/s20216198
- Tutorial: Guidelines for implementing low-cost sensor networks for aerosol monitoring N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105872
- The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136791
- Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution A. Masic et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020
- Patterns of distributive environmental inequity under different PM2.5 air pollution scenarios for Salt Lake County public schools C. Mullen et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109543
- Global Ozone (GO3) Project and AQTreks: Use of evolving technologies by students and citizen scientists to monitor air pollutants J. Ellenburg et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100048
- Publicly available low-cost sensor measurements for PM2.5 exposure modeling: Guidance for monitor deployment and data selection J. Bi et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106897
- Long-Term Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM) Sensor H. Lee et al. 10.3390/s20133617
- A data-driven approach for characterizing community scale air pollution exposure disparities in inland Southern California K. Do et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105704
- Evaluating the PurpleAir monitor as an aerosol light scattering instrument J. Ouimette et al. 10.5194/amt-15-655-2022
- Review of urban computing in air quality management as smart city service: An integrated IoT, AI, and cloud technology perspective A. Kaginalkar et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100972
- Monitoring Excess Exposure to Air Pollution for Professional Drivers in London Using Low-Cost Sensors L. Frederickson et al. 10.3390/atmos11070749
- Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al. 10.3390/s22010394
- A systematic investigation on the effects of temperature and relative humidity on the performance of eight low-cost particle sensors and devices Y. Zou et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105715
- Evaluation of nine machine learning regression algorithms for calibration of low-cost PM2.5 sensor V. Kumar & M. Sahu 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105809
- Improved PM2.5 concentration estimates from low-cost sensors using calibration models categorized by relative humidity J. Hua et al. 10.1080/02786826.2021.1873911
- Estimating Mass Concentration Using a Low-cost Portable Particle Counter Based on Full-year Observations: Issues to Obtain Reliable Atmospheric PM2.5 Data S. Ueda et al. 10.5572/ajae.2020.14.2.155
- Low-cost monitoring of atmospheric PM—development and testing C. Báthory et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114158
- Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring: Techniques, trends, and challenges L. Liang 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163
- Environmental Particulate Matter (PM) Exposure Assessment of Construction Activities Using Low-Cost PM Sensor and Latin Hypercubic Technique M. Khan et al. 10.3390/su13147797
- Low Cost Sensor Networks: How Do We Know the Data Are Reliable? D. Williams 10.1021/acssensors.9b01455
- Measurements of PM<sub>2.5</sub> with PurpleAir under atmospheric conditions K. Ardon-Dryer et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5441-2020
- The MAPM (Mapping Air Pollution eMissions) method for inferring particulate matter emissions maps at city scale from in situ concentration measurements: description and demonstration of capability B. Nathan et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14089-2021
- Role of endogenous melatonin in pathophysiologic and oxidative stress responses to personal air pollutant exposures in asthmatic children L. He et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145709
- Effects of individual ozone exposure on lung function in the elderly: a cross-sectional study in China J. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s11356-019-04324-w
- Estimating long‐term time‐resolved indoor PM 2.5 of outdoor and indoor origin using easily obtainable inputs T. Xia et al. 10.1111/ina.12905
- Extended fumigation effect on surface and boundary layer aerosol concentrations observed during solar eclipse M. Ratnam et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2020.10.003
- Assessing the sources of particles at an urban background site using both regulatory instruments and low-cost sensors – a comparative study D. Bousiotis et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4139-2021
- Bioaerosol sampling optimization for community exposure assessment in cities with poor sanitation: A one health cross-sectional study L. Rocha-Melogno et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139495
- Application of Machine Learning for the in-Field Correction of a PM2.5 Low-Cost Sensor Network W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20175002
- Characterizing outdoor infiltration and indoor contribution of PM2.5 with citizen-based low-cost monitoring data J. Bi et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116763
- Wildfire smoke impacts on indoor air quality assessed using crowdsourced data in California Y. Liang et al. 10.1073/pnas.2106478118
- Qualification of the Alphasense optical particle counter for inline air quality monitoring S. Bezantakos et al. 10.1080/02786826.2020.1864276
- Malondialdehyde in Nasal Fluid: A Biomarker for Monitoring Asthma Control in Relation to Air Pollution Exposure L. He et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c02558
- Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions H. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos11020212
- The Impacts of Prescribed Fire on PM2.5 Air Quality and Human Health: Application to Asthma-Related Emergency Room Visits in Georgia, USA R. Huang et al. 10.3390/ijerph16132312
- Domain Adaptation-Based Deep Calibration of Low-Cost PM₂.₅ Sensors S. Jha et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3118454
- Visualization of Dust Generation in Outdoor Workplaces Using A Wearable Particle Monitor and Global Navigation Satellite System S. SEKOGUCHI et al. 10.7888/juoeh.44.1
- Performance of low-cost indoor air quality monitors for PM2.5 and PM10 from residential sources Z. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106654
- Performance of a Low-Cost Sensor Community Air Monitoring Network in Imperial County, CA P. English et al. 10.3390/s20113031
- Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
- Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach D. Hagan & J. Kroll 10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020
- Performance Assessment of a Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor for a near Four-Month Period in Oslo, Norway H. Liu et al. 10.3390/atmos10020041
- Strategies of method selection for fine-scale PM<sub>2.5</sub> mapping in an intra-urban area using crowdsourced monitoring S. Xu et al. 10.5194/amt-12-2933-2019
- A Multipollutant Smoke Emissions Sensing and Sampling Instrument Package for Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Development and Testing K. Nelson et al. 10.3390/fire2020032
- Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site B. Feenstra et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116946
- Estimating the spatial variability of fine particles at the neighborhood scale using a distributed network of particle sensors R. Shafran-Nathan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117011
- Low-cost solar PV soiling sensor validation and size resolved soiling impacts: A comprehensive field study in Western India M. Valerino et al. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.118
- Predicting Photovoltaic Soiling From Air Quality Measurements S. Toth et al. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.2983990
- Using a network of lower-cost monitors to identify the influence of modifiable factors driving spatial patterns in fine particulate matter concentrations in an urban environment S. Rose Eilenberg et al. 10.1038/s41370-020-0255-x
- Evaluation of Two Low-Cost Optical Particle Counters for the Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Scattering Coefficient and Ångström Exponent K. Markowicz & M. Chiliński 10.3390/s20092617
- Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM<sub>2.5</sub> data collected with the PurpleAir sensor K. Barkjohn et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021
- Assessing Inequitable Urban Heat Islands and Air Pollution Disparities with Low-Cost Sensors in Richmond, Virginia A. Eanes et al. 10.3390/su122310089
- A new evaluation method of three different low-cost dust sensors using exponentially decaying particle concentrations K. Kang et al. 10.4491/eer.2020.501
- Community-Based Measurements Reveal Unseen Differences during Air Pollution Episodes K. Kelly et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c02341
- Demonstration of a Low-Cost Multi-Pollutant Network to Quantify Intra-Urban Spatial Variations in Air Pollutant Source Impacts and to Evaluate Environmental Justice R. Tanzer et al. 10.3390/ijerph16142523
- Evaluation and Application of a Novel Low-Cost Wearable Sensing Device in Assessing Real-Time PM2.5 Exposure in Major Asian Transportation Modes W. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos12020270
- Effects of Road Traffic on the Accuracy and Bias of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor Measurements in Houston, Texas T. Oluwadairo et al. 10.3390/ijerph19031086
- Evaluation of a low-cost multi-channel monitor for indoor air quality through a novel, low-cost, and reproducible platform A. Baldelli 10.1016/j.measen.2021.100059
- The effects of ventilation and filtration on indoor PM2.5 in office buildings in four countries E. Jones et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107975
- Associations of personal exposure to air pollutants with airway mechanics in children with asthma L. He et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105647
- Fusion of Environmental Sensing on PM2.5 and Deep Learning on Vehicle Detecting for Acquiring Roadside PM2.5 Concentration Increments W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20174679
- Calibration of CO, NO2, and O3 Using Airify: A Low-Cost Sensor Cluster for Air Quality Monitoring M. Ionascu et al. 10.3390/s21237977
- Laboratory Evaluations of Correction Equations with Multiple Choices for Seed Low-Cost Particle Sensing Devices in Sensor Networks W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20133661
- Detection of PM2.5 plume movement from IoT ground level monitoring data T. Kanabkaew et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.082
- Personal Exposure to PM2.5 Oxidative Potential in Association with Pulmonary Pathophysiologic Outcomes in Children with Asthma L. He et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c06114
- Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al. 10.3390/atmos10090506
- Ultra-Light Airborne Measurement System for Investigation of Urban Boundary Layer Dynamics P. Sekula et al. 10.3390/s21092920
- Connecting Air Quality with Emotional Well-Being and Neighborhood Infrastructure in a US City R. Lal et al. 10.1177/1178630220915488
- Toxic volatile organic compounds in 20 homes in Shanghai: Concentrations, inhalation health risks, and the impacts of household air cleaning L. Fang et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.047
- Elemental: An Open-Source Wireless Hardware and Software Platform for Building Energy and Indoor Environmental Monitoring and Control A. Ali et al. 10.3390/s19184017
- Traceable PM2.5 and PM10 Calibration of Low-Cost Sensors with Ambient-like Aerosols Generated in the Laboratory S. Horender et al. 10.3390/app11199014
- Measurement of Air Pollution Parameters in Montenegro Using the Ecomar System N. Zaric et al. 10.3390/ijerph18126565
- Influence of particle properties and environmental factors on the performance of typical particle monitors and low-cost particle sensors in the market of China D. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118825
- Application of low-cost fine particulate mass monitors to convert satellite aerosol optical depth to surface concentrations in North America and Africa C. Malings et al. 10.5194/amt-13-3873-2020
3 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Advantages and challenges of the implementation of a low-cost particulate matter monitoring system as a decision-making tool V. Caquilpán P. et al. 10.1007/s10661-019-7875-4
- An experimental application of laser-scattering sensor to estimate the traffic-induced PM2.5 in Beijing X. Liu et al. 10.1007/s10661-020-08398-9
- Application and evaluation of a low-cost PM sensor and data fusion with CMAQ simulations to quantify the impacts of prescribed burning on air quality in Southwestern Georgia, USA R. Huang et al. 10.1080/10962247.2021.1924311
Discussed (final revised paper)
Discussed (preprint)
Latest update: 03 Jun 2023
Short summary
Low-cost particulate matter sensors are promising tools for supplementing existing air quality monitoring networks but their performance under field conditions is not well understood. We characterized how well Plantower PMS3003 sensors measure PM2.5 in a wide range of ambient conditions against different reference sensors. When a more precise reference method is used for calibration and proper RH corrections are made, our work suggests PMS3003's can measure PM2.5 within ~ 10 % of ambient values.
Low-cost particulate matter sensors are promising tools for supplementing existing air quality...