Articles | Volume 11, issue 8
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4823–4846, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4823–4846, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
Research article
22 Aug 2018
Research article | 22 Aug 2018

Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments

Tongshu Zheng et al.

Related authors

Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi
Tongshu Zheng, Michael H. Bergin, Ronak Sutaria, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Robert Caldow, and David E. Carlson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5161–5181, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
An instrument for direct measurement of emissions: cooling tower example
Christopher D. Wallis, Mason D. Leandro, Patrick Y. Chuang, and Anthony S. Wexler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2547–2556, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2547-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2547-2022, 2022
Short summary
The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS)
Karin Ardon-Dryer, Mary C. Kelley, Xia Xueting, and Yuval Dryer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2345–2360, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2345-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2345-2022, 2022
Short summary
Laser imaging nephelometer for aircraft deployment
Adam T. Ahern, Frank Erdesz, Nicholas L. Wagner, Charles A. Brock, Ming Lyu, Kyra Slovacek, Richard H. Moore, Elizabeth B. Wiggins, and Daniel M. Murphy
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1093–1105, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1093-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1093-2022, 2022
Short summary
A new method to quantify particulate sodium and potassium salts (nitrate, chloride, and sulfate) by thermal desorption aerosol mass spectrometry
Yuya Kobayashi and Nobuyuki Takegawa
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 833–844, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-833-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-833-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluating the PurpleAir monitor as an aerosol light scattering instrument
James R. Ouimette, William C. Malm, Bret A. Schichtel, Patrick J. Sheridan, Elisabeth Andrews, John A. Ogren, and W. Patrick Arnott
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 655–676, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-655-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-655-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Austin, E., Novosselov, I., Seto, E., and Yost, M. G.: Laboratory evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS low-cost particulate matter sensor, PLoS One, 10, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137789, 2015. 
Bergin, M. H., Tripathi, S. N., Jai Devi, J., Gupta, T., Mckenzie, M., Rana, K. S., Shafer, M. M., Villalobos, A. M., and Schauer, J. J.: The discoloration of the Taj Mahal due to particulate carbon and dust deposition, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 808–812, https://doi.org/10.1021/es504005q, 2015. 
Bran, S. H. and Srivastava, R.: Investigation of PM2.5 mass concentration over India using a regional climate model, Environ. Pollut., 224, 484–493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.030, 2017. 
Breen, M. S., Long, T. C., Schultz, B. D., Williams, R. W., Richmond-Bryant, J., Breen, M., Langstaff, J. E., Devlin, R. B., Schneider, A., Burke, J. M., Batterman, S. A., and Meng, Q. Y.: Air Pollution Exposure Model for Individuals (EMI) in Health Studies: Evaluation for Ambient PM 2.5 in Central North Carolina, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14184–14194, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02765, 2015. 
Chakrabarti, B., Fine, P. M., Delfino, R., and Sioutas, C.: Performance evaluation of the active-flow personal DataRAM PM2.5 mass monitor (Thermo Anderson pDR-1200) designed for continuous personal exposure measurements, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3329–3340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.007, 2004. 
Download
Short summary
Low-cost particulate matter sensors are promising tools for supplementing existing air quality monitoring networks but their performance under field conditions is not well understood. We characterized how well Plantower PMS3003 sensors measure PM2.5 in a wide range of ambient conditions against different reference sensors. When a more precise reference method is used for calibration and proper RH corrections are made, our work suggests PMS3003's can measure PM2.5 within ~ 10 % of ambient values.