Articles | Volume 11, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
Research article
 | 
22 Aug 2018
Research article |  | 22 Aug 2018

Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments

Tongshu Zheng, Michael H. Bergin, Karoline K. Johnson, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Shilpa Shirodkar, Matthew S. Landis, Ronak Sutaria, and David E. Carlson

Related authors

Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi
Tongshu Zheng, Michael H. Bergin, Ronak Sutaria, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Robert Caldow, and David E. Carlson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5161–5181, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Deriving the hygroscopicity of ambient particles using low-cost optical particle counters
Wei-Chieh Huang, Hui-Ming Hung, Ching-Wei Chu, Wei-Chun Hwang, and Shih-Chun Candice Lung
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6073–6084, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6073-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6073-2024, 2024
Short summary
Performance evaluation of an online monitor based on X-ray fluorescence for detecting elemental concentrations in ambient particulate matter
Ivonne Trebs, Céline Lett, Andreas Krein, Erika Matsumoto Kawaguchi, and Jürgen Junk
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-134,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-134, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Simulations of the collection of mesospheric dust particles with a rocket instrument
Adrien Pineau, Henriette Trollvik, Herman Greaker, Sveinung Olsen, Yngve Eilertsen, and Ingrid Mann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3843–3861, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3843-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3843-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterisation of particle single-scattering albedo with a modified airborne dual-wavelength CAPS monitor
Chenjie Yu, Edouard Pangui, Kevin Tu, Mathieu Cazaunau, Maxime Feingesicht, Landsheere Xavier, Thierry Bourrianne, Vincent Michoud, Christopher Cantrell, Timothy B. Onasch, Andrew Freedman, and Paola Formenti
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3419–3437, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3419-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3419-2024, 2024
Short summary
Use of an uncrewed aerial system to investigate aerosol direct and indirect radiative forcing effects in the marine atmosphere
Patricia K. Quinn, Timothy S. Bates, Derek J. Coffman, James E. Johnson, and Lucia M. Upchurch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3157–3170, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3157-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3157-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Austin, E., Novosselov, I., Seto, E., and Yost, M. G.: Laboratory evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS low-cost particulate matter sensor, PLoS One, 10, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137789, 2015. 
Bergin, M. H., Tripathi, S. N., Jai Devi, J., Gupta, T., Mckenzie, M., Rana, K. S., Shafer, M. M., Villalobos, A. M., and Schauer, J. J.: The discoloration of the Taj Mahal due to particulate carbon and dust deposition, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 808–812, https://doi.org/10.1021/es504005q, 2015. 
Bran, S. H. and Srivastava, R.: Investigation of PM2.5 mass concentration over India using a regional climate model, Environ. Pollut., 224, 484–493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.030, 2017. 
Breen, M. S., Long, T. C., Schultz, B. D., Williams, R. W., Richmond-Bryant, J., Breen, M., Langstaff, J. E., Devlin, R. B., Schneider, A., Burke, J. M., Batterman, S. A., and Meng, Q. Y.: Air Pollution Exposure Model for Individuals (EMI) in Health Studies: Evaluation for Ambient PM 2.5 in Central North Carolina, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14184–14194, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02765, 2015. 
Chakrabarti, B., Fine, P. M., Delfino, R., and Sioutas, C.: Performance evaluation of the active-flow personal DataRAM PM2.5 mass monitor (Thermo Anderson pDR-1200) designed for continuous personal exposure measurements, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3329–3340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.007, 2004. 
Download
Short summary
Low-cost particulate matter sensors are promising tools for supplementing existing air quality monitoring networks but their performance under field conditions is not well understood. We characterized how well Plantower PMS3003 sensors measure PM2.5 in a wide range of ambient conditions against different reference sensors. When a more precise reference method is used for calibration and proper RH corrections are made, our work suggests PMS3003's can measure PM2.5 within ~ 10 % of ambient values.