Dear authors,

Thank you for your revised submission. I have now received comments on it from two reviewers and had some further discussion with them; while we appreciate the efforts put into the revision, both reviewers feel that further revisions are necessary before the manuscript is suitable for publication. Reviewer 1 has a few suggestions for clarification while Reviewer 3 has some more serious concerns about the validity of the method proposed.

I have attached a pdf combining these two reviewers’ comments (pages 1-2 are Reviewer 1, 3-7 are Reviewer 3). Reviewer 3 has provided some detailed discussion of what they see as the problems with the method. I encourage you to prepare a further revision of your manuscript, and would appreciate if you could carefully read and respond to the concerns raised by Reviewer 3 in particular. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best wishes,

Andrew

Dear authors,

Thank you for your further-revised submission. Following some further reading and discussion, I believe that you have addressed the mathematical/scientific concerns adequately, and I feel that the remaining areas of disagreement are more about application than the fundamental technique itself. I am therefore happy to accept your manuscript for publication in AMT.

Best wishes,

Andrew

Paper is still accepted - uploading final comments from reviewer Kgaran (detailing May revision), received this week, to the system.