Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2241–2255, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2241-2020
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2241–2255, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2241-2020

Research article 08 May 2020

Research article | 08 May 2020

Intercomparison study of atmospheric 222Rn and 222Rn progeny monitors

Claudia Grossi et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Claudia Grossi on behalf of the Authors (06 Feb 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (25 Feb 2020) by Tim Arnold
AR by Lorena Grabowski on behalf of the Authors (16 Mar 2020)  Author's response
ED: Publish as is (26 Mar 2020) by Tim Arnold
Download
Short summary
The sustainable support of radon metrology at the environmental level offers new scientific possibilities for the quantification of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the determination of their source terms as well as for the identification of radioactive sources for the assessment of radiation exposure. This study helps to harmonize the techniques commonly used for atmospheric radon and radon progeny activity concentration measurements.