Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2241–2255, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2241-2020
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2241–2255, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2241-2020

Research article 08 May 2020

Research article | 08 May 2020

Intercomparison study of atmospheric 222Rn and 222Rn progeny monitors

Claudia Grossi et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,395 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
893 475 27 1,395 174 16 15
  • HTML: 893
  • PDF: 475
  • XML: 27
  • Total: 1,395
  • Supplement: 174
  • BibTeX: 16
  • EndNote: 15
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,205 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,203 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 05 Dec 2021
Download
Short summary
The sustainable support of radon metrology at the environmental level offers new scientific possibilities for the quantification of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the determination of their source terms as well as for the identification of radioactive sources for the assessment of radiation exposure. This study helps to harmonize the techniques commonly used for atmospheric radon and radon progeny activity concentration measurements.