39 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Intelligent and Scalable Air Quality Monitoring With 5G Edge X. Su et al. 10.1109/MIC.2021.3059189
2. GeoAir—A Novel Portable, GPS-Enabled, Low-Cost Air-Pollution Sensor: Design Strategies to Facilitate Citizen Science Research and Geospatial Assessments of Personal Exposure Y. Park et al. 10.3390/s21113761
3. Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution A. Masic et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020
4. Integrated evanescent field detector for ultrafine particles—theory and concept A. Buchberger et al. 10.1364/OE.394396
5. Effects of aerosol type and simulated aging on performance of low-cost PM sensors J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105654
6. Utilization of scattering and absorption-based particulate matter sensors in the environment impacted by residential wood combustion J. Kuula et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105671
7. Added Value of Vaisala AQT530 Sensors as a Part of a Sensor Network for Comprehensive Air Quality Monitoring T. Petäjä et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.719567
8. Laboratory evaluation of the effects of particle size and composition on the performance of integrated devices containing Plantower particle sensors Y. Zou et al. 10.1080/02786826.2021.1905148
9. Design and testing of a low-cost sensor and sampling platform for indoor air quality J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108398
10. A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers’ Perspectives B. Alfano et al. 10.3390/s20236819
11. Learning Calibration Functions on the Fly: Hybrid Batch Online Stacking Ensembles for the Calibration of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Networks in the Presence of Concept Drift E. Bagkis et al. 10.3390/atmos13030416
12. Performance and Deployment of Low-Cost Particle Sensor Units to Monitor Biomass Burning Events and Their Application in an Educational Initiative F. Reisen et al. 10.3390/s21217206
13. From low-cost sensors to high-quality data: A summary of challenges and best practices for effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors M. Giordano et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833
14. The Relocation Problem of Field Calibrated Low-Cost Sensor Systems in Air Quality Monitoring: A Sampling Bias G. Tancev & C. Pascale 10.3390/s20216198
15. High-resolution large-eddy simulation of indoor turbulence and its effect on airborne transmission of respiratory pathogens—Model validation and infection probability analysis M. Auvinen et al. 10.1063/5.0076495
16. Community-Based Measurements Reveal Unseen Differences during Air Pollution Episodes K. Kelly et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c02341
17. Quantification of aerosol dispersal from suspected aerosol-generating procedures R. Strand-Amundsen et al. 10.1183/23120541.00206-2021
18. Laboratory and field evaluation of three low‐cost particulate matter sensors M. Ghamari et al. 10.1049/wss2.12034
19. Field Evaluation of Low-Cost PM Sensors (Purple Air PA-II) Under Variable Urban Air Quality Conditions, in Greece I. Stavroulas et al. 10.3390/atmos11090926
20. Application of Machine Learning for the in-Field Correction of a PM2.5 Low-Cost Sensor Network W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20175002
21. Assessment of PM2.5 Exposure during Cycle Trips in The Netherlands Using Low-Cost Sensors J. Wesseling et al. 10.3390/ijerph18116007
22. Development of Drone-Mounted Multiple Sensing System with Advanced Mobility for In Situ Atmospheric Measurement: A Case Study Focusing on PM2.5 Local Distribution H. Madokoro et al. 10.3390/s21144881
23. Calibration Method for Particulate Matter Low-Cost Sensors Used in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and Research J. Venkatraman Jagatha et al. 10.3390/s21123960
24. Silicon Nitride Photonic Particle Detector—Experiments and Model Assessment A. Buchberger et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3087633
25. Traceable PM2.5 and PM10 Calibration of Low-Cost Sensors with Ambient-like Aerosols Generated in the Laboratory S. Horender et al. 10.3390/app11199014
26. Recent developments in polysaccharide-based electrospun nanofibers for environmental applications Z. Raza et al. 10.1016/j.carres.2021.108443
27. Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al. 10.3390/s22010394
28. Assessment of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor Systems against Optical and Gravimetric Methods in a Field Co-Location in Norway M. Vogt et al. 10.3390/atmos12080961
29. Application of Gaussian Mixture Regression for the Correction of Low Cost PM2.5 Monitoring Data in Accra, Ghana C. McFarlane et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00217
30. How to Get the Best from Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors: Guidelines and Practical Recommendations E. Brattich et al. 10.3390/s20113073
31. Statistics of a Sharp GP2Y Low-Cost Aerosol PM Sensor Output Signals K. Bučar et al. 10.3390/s20236707
32. Evaluation and Application of a Novel Low-Cost Wearable Sensing Device in Assessing Real-Time PM2.5 Exposure in Major Asian Transportation Modes W. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos12020270
33. Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM<sub>2.5</sub> data collected with the PurpleAir sensor K. Barkjohn et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021
34. Low-cost air quality monitoring system design and comparative analysis with a conventional method M. Jacob et al. 10.1007/s40095-021-00415-y
35. Wildfire smoke impacts on indoor air quality assessed using crowdsourced data in California Y. Liang et al. 10.1073/pnas.2106478118
36. Evaluating the PurpleAir monitor as an aerosol light scattering instrument J. Ouimette et al. 10.5194/amt-15-655-2022
37. Laboratory Evaluation of Low-Cost Optical Particle Counters for Environmental and Occupational Exposures S. Sousan et al. 10.3390/s21124146
38. Outward and inward protection efficiencies of different mask designs for different respiratory activities X. Koh et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105905
39. Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Indoor Air Monitoring during COVID-19 Lockdown M. Kaliszewski et al. 10.3390/s20247290