Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020
Research article
 | 
15 May 2020
Research article |  | 15 May 2020

Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors

Joel Kuula, Timo Mäkelä, Minna Aurela, Kimmo Teinilä, Samu Varjonen, Óscar González, and Hilkka Timonen

Related authors

Opinion: Insights into updating Ambient Air Quality Directive 2008/50/EC
Joel Kuula, Hilkka Timonen, Jarkko V. Niemi, Hanna E. Manninen, Topi Rönkkö, Tareq Hussein, Pak Lun Fung, Sasu Tarkoma, Mikko Laakso, Erkka Saukko, Aino Ovaska, Markku Kulmala, Ari Karppinen, Lasse Johansson, and Tuukka Petäjä
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4801–4808, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4801-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4801-2022, 2022
Short summary
Input-adaptive linear mixed-effects model for estimating alveolar lung-deposited surface area (LDSA) using multipollutant datasets
Pak Lun Fung, Martha A. Zaidan, Jarkko V. Niemi, Erkka Saukko, Hilkka Timonen, Anu Kousa, Joel Kuula, Topi Rönkkö, Ari Karppinen, Sasu Tarkoma, Markku Kulmala, Tuukka Petäjä, and Tareq Hussein
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1861–1882, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1861-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1861-2022, 2022
Short summary
Effects of marine fuel sulfur restrictions on particle number concentrations and size distributions in ship plumes in the Baltic Sea
Sami D. Seppälä, Joel Kuula, Antti-Pekka Hyvärinen, Sanna Saarikoski, Topi Rönkkö, Jorma Keskinen, Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen, and Hilkka Timonen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3215–3234, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3215-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3215-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Characterization of the Vaporization Inlet for Aerosols (VIA) for online measurements of particulate highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs)
Jian Zhao, Valter Mickwitz, Yuanyuan Luo, Ella Häkkinen, Frans Graeffe, Jiangyi Zhang, Hilkka Timonen, Manjula Canagaratna, Jordan E. Krechmer, Qi Zhang, Markku Kulmala, Juha Kangasluoma, Douglas Worsnop, and Mikael Ehn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1527–1543, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1527-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1527-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development and characterization of a high-performance single-particle aerosol mass spectrometer (HP-SPAMS)
Xubing Du, Qinhui Xie, Qing Huang, Xuan Li, Junlin Yang, Zhihui Hou, Jingjing Wang, Xue Li, Zhen Zhou, Zhengxu Huang, Wei Gao, and Lei Li
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1037–1050, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1037-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1037-2024, 2024
Short summary
Micro-PINGUIN: Microtiter plate-based ice nucleation detection in gallium with an infrared camera
Corina Wieber, Mads Rosenhøj Jeppesen, Kai Finster, Claus Melvad, and Tina Šantl-Temkiv
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.27.559697,https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.27.559697, 2024
Short summary
Quality assurance and quality control of atmospheric organosulfates measured using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)
Ping Liu, Xiang Ding, Yu-Qing Zhang, Daniel J. Bryant, and Xin-Ming Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-250,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-250, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Characterization of the planar differential mobility analyzer (DMA P5): resolving power, transmission efficiency and its application to atmospheric relevant cluster measurements
Zhengning Xu, Jian Gao, Zhuanghao Xu, Michel Attoui, Xiangyu Pei, Mario Amo-González, Kewei Zhang, and Zhibin Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5995–6006, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5995-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5995-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Austin, E., Novosselov, I., Seto, E., and Yost, M. G.: Laboratory evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS low-cost particulate matter sensor, PLoS One, 10, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137789, 2015. 
Badura, M., Batog, P., Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, A., and Modzel, P.: Evaluation of low-cost sensors for ambient PM2.5 monitoring, J. Sensors, 2018, 5096540, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5096540, 2018. 
Bai, L., Huang, L., Wang, Z., Ying, Q., Zheng, J., Shi, X., and Hu, J.: Long-term field Evaluation of Low-cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Nanjing, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 20, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.11.0424, 2019. 
Berglund, R. N. and Liu, B. Y. H.: Generation of Monodisperse Aerosol Standards, Environ. Sci. Technol., 7, 147–153, https://doi.org/10.1021/es60074a001, 1973. 
Budde, M., D. Schwarz, A., Müller, T., Laquai, B., Streibl, N., Schindler, G., Köpke, M., Riedel, T., Dittler, A., and Beigl, M.: Potential and Limitations of the Low-Cost SDS011 Particle Sensor for Monitoring Urban Air Quality, 3rd International Conference on Atmospheric Dust (DUST2018), ProScience, 5, 6–12, https://doi.org/10.14644/dust.2018.002, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Particle-size-dependent detection ranges of low-cost particulate matter sensors were evaluated in a laboratory experiment. Six different sensor models were evaluated altogether. The results showed that none of the sensor models adhered to the technical specifications provided by the manufacturers, and thus a high risk of sensor misuse is posed. It is paramount that the limitations regarding the particle size discrimination of low-cost sensors are acknowledged properly.