Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020
Research article
 | 
15 May 2020
Research article |  | 15 May 2020

Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors

Joel Kuula, Timo Mäkelä, Minna Aurela, Kimmo Teinilä, Samu Varjonen, Óscar González, and Hilkka Timonen

Related authors

Data collected by a drone backpack for air quality and atmospheric state measurements during Pallas Cloud Experiment 2022 (PaCE2022)
David Brus, Viet Le, Joel Kuula, and Konstantinos Doulgeris
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-61,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-61, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Validation of cantilever-enhanced photoacoustic particle-size-resolved light absorption measurement using nigrosin reference particles and Mie modelling
Joel Kuula, Juho Karhu, Tommi Mikkonen, Patrick Grahn, Aki Virkkula, Hilkka Timonen, Tuomas Hieta, and Markku Vainio
Aerosol Research, 3, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-1-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-1-2025, 2025
Short summary
Measurement report: Wintertime aerosol characterization at an urban traffic site in Helsinki Finland
Kimmo Teinilä, Sanna Saarikoski, Henna Lintusaari, Teemu Lepistö, Petteri Marjanen, Minna Aurela, Heidi Hellén, Toni Tykkä, Markus Lampimäki, Janne Lampilahti, Luis Barreira, Timo Mäkelä, Leena Kangas, Juha Hatakka, Sami Harni, Joel Kuula, Jarkko V. Niemi, Harri Portin, Jaakko Yli-Ojanperä, Ville Niemelä, Milja Jäppi, Katrianne Lehtipalo, Joonas Vanhanen, Liisa Pirjola, Hanna E. Manninen, Tuukka Petäjä, Topi Rönkkö, and Hilkka Timonen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2235,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2235, 2024
Short summary
Field-deployable cantilever-enhanced photoacoustic instrument for aerosol light absorption measurement at three wavelengths
Juho Karhu, Tommi Mikkonen, Joel Kuula, Aki Virkkula, Erkki Ikonen, Markku Vainio, Hilkka Timonen, and Tuomas Hieta
Aerosol Research Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2024-25,https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2024-25, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AR
Short summary
A novel aerosol filter sampler for measuring the vertical distribution of ice-nucleating particles via fixed-wing uncrewed aerial vehicles
Alexander Julian Böhmländer, Larissa Lacher, David Brus, Konstantinos-Matthaios Doulgeris, Zoé Brasseur, Matthew Boyer, Joel Kuula, Thomas Leisner, and Ottmar Möhler
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-120,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-120, 2024
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
A novel methodology for assessing the hygroscopicity of aerosol filter samples
Nagendra Raparthi, Anthony S. Wexler, and Ann M. Dillner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 603–618, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-603-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-603-2025, 2025
Short summary
Direct calibration using atmospheric particles and performance evaluation of Particle Size Magnifier (PSM) 2.0 for sub-10 nm particle measurements
Yiliang Liu, Arttu Yli-Kujala, Fabian Schmidt-Ott, Sebastian Holm, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Joonas Enroth, Joonas Vanhanen, Runlong Cai, Tuukka Petäjä, Markku Kulmala, Yang Chen, and Juha Kangasluoma
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 431–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-431-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-431-2025, 2025
Short summary
Merging holography, fluorescence, and machine learning for in situ continuous characterization and classification of airborne microplastics
Nicholas D. Beres, Julia Burkart, Elias Graf, Yanick Zeder, Lea Ann Dailey, and Bernadett Weinzierl
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6945–6964, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6945-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6945-2024, 2024
Short summary
Rapid quantitative analysis of semi-volatile organic compounds in indoor surface film using direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry: a case study on phthalates
Ying Zhou, Longkun He, Jiang Tan, Jiang Zhou, and Yingjun Liu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6415–6423, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6415-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6415-2024, 2024
Short summary
Determining optimal sampling conditions in the TSI Nanometer Aerosol Sampler 3089
Behnaz Alinaghipour, Sadegh Niazi, Robert Groth, Branka Miljevic, and Zoran Ristovski
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2161,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2161, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Austin, E., Novosselov, I., Seto, E., and Yost, M. G.: Laboratory evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS low-cost particulate matter sensor, PLoS One, 10, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137789, 2015. 
Badura, M., Batog, P., Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, A., and Modzel, P.: Evaluation of low-cost sensors for ambient PM2.5 monitoring, J. Sensors, 2018, 5096540, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5096540, 2018. 
Bai, L., Huang, L., Wang, Z., Ying, Q., Zheng, J., Shi, X., and Hu, J.: Long-term field Evaluation of Low-cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Nanjing, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 20, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.11.0424, 2019. 
Berglund, R. N. and Liu, B. Y. H.: Generation of Monodisperse Aerosol Standards, Environ. Sci. Technol., 7, 147–153, https://doi.org/10.1021/es60074a001, 1973. 
Budde, M., D. Schwarz, A., Müller, T., Laquai, B., Streibl, N., Schindler, G., Köpke, M., Riedel, T., Dittler, A., and Beigl, M.: Potential and Limitations of the Low-Cost SDS011 Particle Sensor for Monitoring Urban Air Quality, 3rd International Conference on Atmospheric Dust (DUST2018), ProScience, 5, 6–12, https://doi.org/10.14644/dust.2018.002, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Particle-size-dependent detection ranges of low-cost particulate matter sensors were evaluated in a laboratory experiment. Six different sensor models were evaluated altogether. The results showed that none of the sensor models adhered to the technical specifications provided by the manufacturers, and thus a high risk of sensor misuse is posed. It is paramount that the limitations regarding the particle size discrimination of low-cost sensors are acknowledged properly.
Share