Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4683-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4683-2020
Research article
 | 
04 Sep 2020
Research article |  | 04 Sep 2020

Automated precipitation monitoring with the Thies disdrometer: biases and ways for improvement

Michael Fehlmann, Mario Rohrer, Annakaisa von Lerber, and Markus Stoffel

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Michael Fehlmann on behalf of the Authors (17 Jun 2020)  Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (29 Jun 2020) by Alexis Berne
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (06 Jul 2020)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (07 Jul 2020) by Alexis Berne
AR by Michael Fehlmann on behalf of the Authors (22 Jul 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (24 Jul 2020) by Alexis Berne
AR by Michael Fehlmann on behalf of the Authors (27 Jul 2020)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
The Thies disdrometer is used to monitor precipitation intensity and its phase and thus may provide valuable information for the management of meteorological and hydrological risks. In this study, we characterize biases of this instrument using common reference instruments at a pre-alpine study site in Switzerland. We find a systematic underestimation of liquid precipitation amounts and suggest possible reasons for and corrections to this bias and relate these findings to other study sites.