Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4699-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4699-2020
Research article
 | 
04 Sep 2020
Research article |  | 04 Sep 2020

More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station

Adam Theisen, Max Ungar, Bryan Sheridan, and Bradley G. Illston

Viewed

Total article views: 2,970 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,144 765 61 2,970 54 54
  • HTML: 2,144
  • PDF: 765
  • XML: 61
  • Total: 2,970
  • BibTeX: 54
  • EndNote: 54
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Feb 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Feb 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,970 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,623 with geography defined and 347 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 19 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
A low-cost weather station with 3D-printed components was built, based on the UCAR 3D-PAWS project, and deployed alongside an Oklahoma Mesonet station for an 8-month study to determine the longevity of these sensors and their performance compared with standard commercial sensors. Results show that the low-cost sensors can perform as well as the more expensive commercial ones for short-term deployments with the possibility for long-term deployments with proper maintenance and replacement.