Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4841-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4841-2020
Research article
 | 
14 Sep 2020
Research article |  | 14 Sep 2020

1.5 years of TROPOMI CO measurements: comparisons to MOPITT and ATom

Sara Martínez-Alonso, Merritt Deeter, Helen Worden, Tobias Borsdorff, Ilse Aben, Róisin Commane, Bruce Daube, Gene Francis, Maya George, Jochen Landgraf, Debbie Mao, Kathryn McKain, and Steven Wofsy

Viewed

Total article views: 4,852 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,848 933 71 4,852 348 72 88
  • HTML: 3,848
  • PDF: 933
  • XML: 71
  • Total: 4,852
  • Supplement: 348
  • BibTeX: 72
  • EndNote: 88
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Mar 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Mar 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,852 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,361 with geography defined and 491 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 21 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
CO is of great importance in climate and air quality studies. To understand newly available TROPOMI data in the frame of the global CO record, we compared those to satellite (MOPITT) and airborne (ATom) CO datasets. The MOPITT dataset is the longest to date (2000–present) and is well-characterized. We used ATom to validate cloudy TROPOMI data over oceans and investigate TROPOMI's vertical sensitivity to CO. Our results show that TROPOMI CO data are in excellent agreement with the other datasets.