Comparison of formaldehyde tropospheric columns in Australia and New Zealand using MAX-DOAS, FTIR and TROPOMI

Ryan, Robert G.; Silver, Jeremy D.; Querel, Richard; Smale, Dan; Rhodes, Steve; Tully, Matt; Jones, Nicholas; Schofield, Robyn

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6501-2020

Articles | Volume 13, issue 12

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6501–6519, 2020

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6501-2020

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6501–6519, 2020

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6501-2020

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 13, issue 12

Research article 04 Dec 2020

Research article | 04 Dec 2020

Comparison of formaldehyde tropospheric columns in Australia and New Zealand using MAX-DOAS, FTIR and TROPOMI

Robert G. Ryan et al.

Download

Final revised paper (published on 04 Dec 2020)
Preprint (discussion started on 03 Jul 2020)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review of Ryan et al. (2020)', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jul 2020
- AC1: 'Responses to Reviewer 1', Robert Ryan, 27 Aug 2020
RC2: 'Comments on “Comparison of formaldehyde tropospheric columns in Australia and New Zealand using MAX-DOAS, FTIR and TROPOMI”', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Aug 2020
- AC2: 'Responses to Reviewer 2', Robert Ryan, 27 Aug 2020
RC3: 'Review of Ryan et al. 2020', Anonymous Referee #3, 05 Aug 2020
- AC3: 'Responses to Reviewer 3', Robert Ryan, 28 Aug 2020

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Robert Ryan on behalf of the Authors (01 Sep 2020) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (20 Oct 2020) by Michel Van Roozendael

AR by Robert Ryan on behalf of the Authors (22 Oct 2020) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (22 Oct 2020) by Michel Van Roozendael

Short summary

Models have identified Australasia as a formaldehyde (HCHO) hotspot from vegetation sources, but few measurement studies exist to verify this. We compare, and find good agreement between, HCHO measurements using three – two ground-based and one satellite-based – different spectroscopic techniques in Australia and New Zealand. This gives confidence in using satellite observations to study HCHO and associated air chemistry and pollution problems in this under-studied part of the world.