Articles | Volume 13, issue 12
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6501–6519, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6501-2020
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6501–6519, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6501-2020
Research article
04 Dec 2020
Research article | 04 Dec 2020

Comparison of formaldehyde tropospheric columns in Australia and New Zealand using MAX-DOAS, FTIR and TROPOMI

Robert G. Ryan et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,479 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
951 499 29 1,479 34 39
  • HTML: 951
  • PDF: 499
  • XML: 29
  • Total: 1,479
  • BibTeX: 34
  • EndNote: 39
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jul 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jul 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,287 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,283 with geography defined and 4 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 03 Jul 2022
Download
Short summary
Models have identified Australasia as a formaldehyde (HCHO) hotspot from vegetation sources, but few measurement studies exist to verify this. We compare, and find good agreement between, HCHO measurements using three – two ground-based and one satellite-based – different spectroscopic techniques in Australia and New Zealand. This gives confidence in using satellite observations to study HCHO and associated air chemistry and pollution problems in this under-studied part of the world.