Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-685-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-685-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
13 Feb 2020
Research article |
| 13 Feb 2020
| 13 Feb 2020
Evaluating different methods for elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS (Multi AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) instruments during the CINDI-2 campaign
Sebastian Donner
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
Jonas Kuhn
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Michel Van Roozendael
BIRA-IASB – Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium
Alkiviadis Bais
Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Steffen Beirle
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
Tim Bösch
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Kristof Bognar
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Ilya Bruchkouski
National Ozone Monitoring Research and Education Center, Belarusian State University (BSU), Minsk, Belarus
Ka Lok Chan
Meteorological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
Steffen Dörner
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
Theano Drosoglou
Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Caroline Fayt
BIRA-IASB – Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium
Udo Frieß
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
François Hendrick
BIRA-IASB – Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium
Christian Hermans
BIRA-IASB – Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium
Junli Jin
CMA Meteorological Observation Center, Beijing, China
Ang Li
Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei, China
Jianzhong Ma
Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, China
Enno Peters
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
now at: Institute for the Protection of Maritime Infrastructures, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Bremerhaven, Germany
Gaia Pinardi
BIRA-IASB – Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium
Andreas Richter
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Stefan F. Schreier
Institute of Meteorology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
André Seyler
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Kimberly Strong
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Jan-Lukas Tirpitz
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Yang Wang
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
Pinhua Xie
Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei, China
Jin Xu
Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei, China
Xiaoyi Zhao
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
now at: Air Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada
Thomas Wagner
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 4,892 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Jun 2019)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,438 | 1,343 | 111 | 4,892 | 148 | 139 |
- HTML: 3,438
- PDF: 1,343
- XML: 111
- Total: 4,892
- BibTeX: 148
- EndNote: 139
Total article views: 3,611 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Feb 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,594 | 918 | 99 | 3,611 | 125 | 128 |
- HTML: 2,594
- PDF: 918
- XML: 99
- Total: 3,611
- BibTeX: 125
- EndNote: 128
Total article views: 1,281 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Jun 2019)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 844 | 425 | 12 | 1,281 | 23 | 11 |
- HTML: 844
- PDF: 425
- XML: 12
- Total: 1,281
- BibTeX: 23
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,892 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,482 with geography defined
and 410 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,611 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,354 with geography defined
and 257 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,281 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,128 with geography defined
and 153 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Latest update: 27 Nov 2025
Short summary
The calibration of the elevation angles of MAX-DOAS instruments is important for the correct interpretation of such MAX-DOAS measurements. We present and evaluate different methods for the elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS instruments which were applied during the CINDI-2 field campaign.
The calibration of the elevation angles of MAX-DOAS instruments is important for the correct...
