Model estimations of geophysical variability between satellite measurements of ozone profiles

Sheese, Patrick E.; Walker, Kaley A.; Boone, Chris D.; Degenstein, Doug A.; Kolonjari, Felicia; Plummer, David; Kinnison, Douglas E.; Jöckel, Patrick; von Clarmann, Thomas

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1425-2021

Articles | Volume 14, issue 2

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1425-2021

© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue:

Towards Unified Error Reporting (TUNER)

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1425-2021

© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 14, issue 2

Research article

|

24 Feb 2021

Research article |

| 24 Feb 2021

Model estimations of geophysical variability between satellite measurements of ozone profiles

Patrick E. Sheese, Kaley A. Walker, Chris D. Boone, Doug A. Degenstein, Felicia Kolonjari, David Plummer, Douglas E. Kinnison, Patrick Jöckel, and Thomas von Clarmann

Download

Final revised paper (published on 24 Feb 2021)
Preprint (discussion started on 13 Jul 2020)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review of Model estimations of geophysical variability between satellite measurements of ozone profiles', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Aug 2020
- AC1: 'Response to Reviewers', Kaley Walker, 14 Oct 2020
RC2: 'Reviewer comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Sep 2020
- AC1: 'Response to Reviewers', Kaley Walker, 14 Oct 2020

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Kaley Walker on behalf of the Authors (31 Oct 2020) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (12 Nov 2020) by Nathaniel Livesey

RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (18 Nov 2020)

RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (26 Nov 2020)

ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (04 Dec 2020) by Nathaniel Livesey

AR by Kaley Walker on behalf of the Authors (11 Dec 2020) Author's response Manuscript

Short summary

Output from climate chemistry models (CMAM, EMAC, and WACCM) is used to estimate the expected geophysical variability of ozone concentrations between coincident satellite instrument measurement times and geolocations. We use the Canadian ACE-FTS and OSIRIS instruments as a case study. Ensemble mean estimates are used to optimize coincidence criteria between the two instruments, allowing for the use of more coincident profiles while providing an estimate of the geophysical variation.