Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1425-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1425-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
Research article
 | 
24 Feb 2021
Research article |  | 24 Feb 2021

Model estimations of geophysical variability between satellite measurements of ozone profiles

Patrick E. Sheese, Kaley A. Walker, Chris D. Boone, Doug A. Degenstein, Felicia Kolonjari, David Plummer, Douglas E. Kinnison, Patrick Jöckel, and Thomas von Clarmann

Viewed

Total article views: 3,139 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,109 836 194 3,139 245 256
  • HTML: 2,109
  • PDF: 836
  • XML: 194
  • Total: 3,139
  • BibTeX: 245
  • EndNote: 256
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,139 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,971 with geography defined and 168 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 02 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Output from climate chemistry models (CMAM, EMAC, and WACCM) is used to estimate the expected geophysical variability of ozone concentrations between coincident satellite instrument measurement times and geolocations. We use the Canadian ACE-FTS and OSIRIS instruments as a case study. Ensemble mean estimates are used to optimize coincidence criteria between the two instruments, allowing for the use of more coincident profiles while providing an estimate of the geophysical variation.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Towards Unified Error Reporting (TUNER)