Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3773-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3773-2021
Research article
 | 
25 May 2021
Research article |  | 25 May 2021

Evaluation of the new DWD ozone and temperature lidar during the Hohenpeißenberg Ozone Profiling Study (HOPS) and comparison of results with previous NDACC campaigns

Robin Wing, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, Thomas J. McGee, John T. Sullivan, Sergey Khaykin, Grant Sumnicht, and Laurence Twigg

Viewed

Total article views: 1,427 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
919 472 36 1,427 47 71
  • HTML: 919
  • PDF: 472
  • XML: 36
  • Total: 1,427
  • BibTeX: 47
  • EndNote: 71
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Nov 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Nov 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,427 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,399 with geography defined and 28 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 21 Jun 2024
Short summary
This paper is a validation study of the newly installed ozone and temperature lidar at Hohenpeißenberg, Germany. As part of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC), lidar stations are routinely compared against a travelling reference lidar operated by NASA. We have also attempted to assess potential biases in the reference lidar by comparing the results of this validation campaign with a previous campaign at the Observatoire de Haute-Provence, France.