Evaluation of the new DWD ozone and temperature lidar   during the Hohenpeißenberg Ozone Profiling Study  (HOPS) and comparison of results with previous NDACC campaigns

Wing, Robin; Godin-Beekmann, Sophie; Steinbrecht, Wolfgang; McGee, Thomas J.; Sullivan, John T.; Khaykin, Sergey; Sumnicht, Grant; Twigg, Laurence

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3773-2021

Articles | Volume 14, issue 5

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3773-2021

© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3773-2021

© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 14, issue 5

Research article

|

25 May 2021

Research article |

| 25 May 2021

Evaluation of the new DWD ozone and temperature lidar during the Hohenpeißenberg Ozone Profiling Study (HOPS) and comparison of results with previous NDACC campaigns

Robin Wing, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, Thomas J. McGee, John T. Sullivan, Sergey Khaykin, Grant Sumnicht, and Laurence Twigg

Download

Final revised paper (published on 25 May 2021)
Preprint (discussion started on 10 Nov 2020)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review of AMT-2020-396', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Dec 2020
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Robin Wing, 30 Mar 2021
RC2: 'Review of AMT-2020-396', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Mar 2021
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Robin Wing, 30 Mar 2021

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Robin Wing on behalf of the Authors (30 Mar 2021) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (12 Apr 2021) by Karin Kreher

Short summary

This paper is a validation study of the newly installed ozone and temperature lidar at Hohenpeißenberg, Germany. As part of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC), lidar stations are routinely compared against a travelling reference lidar operated by NASA. We have also attempted to assess potential biases in the reference lidar by comparing the results of this validation campaign with a previous campaign at the Observatoire de Haute-Provence, France.