Bodega Bay Preprocessed Data: Size-resolved cloud condensation nuclei data collected during the CalWater 2015 field campaign (Version v1.0), edited by: Petters, M. D., Rothfuss, N. E., Taylor, H., Kreidenweis, S. M., DeMott, P. J., and Atwood, S. A.: Zenodo [Data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2605668, 2019.
Borsdorff, T., Hasekamp, O. P., Wassmann, A., and Landgraf, J.: Insights into Tikhonov regularization: application to trace gas column retrieval and the efficient calculation of total column averaging kernels, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 523–535,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-523-2014, 2014.
a
Chen, H., Hodshire, A. L., Ortega, J., Greenberg, J., McMurry, P. H., Carlton, A. G., Pierce, J. R., Hanson, D. R., and Smith, J. N.: Vertically resolved concentration and liquid water content of atmospheric nanoparticles at the US DOE Southern Great Plains site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 311–326,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-311-2018, 2018.
a
Cubison, M., Coe, H., and Gysel, M.: A Modified Hygroscopic Tandem DMA and
a Data Retrieval Method Based on Optimal Estimation, J. Aerosol
Sci., 36, 846–865,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.11.009, 2005.
a,
b,
c
Dawson, K. W., Petters, M. D., Meskhidze, N., Petters, S. S., and Kreidenweis,
S. M.: Hygroscopic Growth and Cloud Droplet Activation of Xanthan Gum as a
Proxy for Marine Hydrogels, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
121, 11803–11818,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025143, 2016.
a
Dubovik, O. and King, M. D.: A Flexible Inversion Algorithm for Retrieval of
Aerosol Optical Properties from Sun and Sky Radiance Measurements,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 20673–20696,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900282, 2000.
a
Eldén, L.: A Weighted Pseudoinverse, Generalized Singular Values, and
Constrained Least Squares Problems, BIT Numerical Mathematics, 22, 487–502,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01934412, 1982.
a,
b
Farmer, D. K., Cappa, C. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Atmospheric Processes
and Their Controlling Influence on Cloud Condensation Nuclei
Activity, Chem. Rev., 115, 4199–4217,
https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006292, 2015.
a
Golub, G. H., Heath, M., and Wahba, G.: Generalized Cross-Validation as
a Method for Choosing a Good Ridge Parameter, Technometrics, 21,
215–223,
https://doi.org/10.2307/1268518, 1979.
a,
b
Gysel, M., McFiggans, G., and Coe, H.: Inversion of Tandem Differential
Mobility Analyser (TDMA) Measurements, J. Aerosol Sci., 40,
134–151,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.07.013, 2009.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g
Hansen, P. C.: 2. Decompositions and Other Tools, in:
Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems, Mathematical
Modeling and Computation, Society for Industrial and
Applied Mathematics, 19–44,
https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898719697.ch2, 1998.
a,
b
Hansen, P. C.: The L-Curve and Its Use in the Numerical Treatment of
Inverse Problems., in: Advances in Computational Bioengineering, edited
by: Johnston, P., WIT Press., 119–142., 2000.
a,
b,
c,
d
Hodshire, A. L., Lawler, M. J., Zhao, J., Ortega, J., Jen, C., Yli-Juuti, T., Brewer, J. F., Kodros, J. K., Barsanti, K. C., Hanson, D. R., McMurry, P. H., Smith, J. N., and Pierce, J. R.: Multiple new-particle growth pathways observed at the US DOE Southern Great Plains field site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9321–9348,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9321-2016, 2016.
a
Jefferson, A., Hageman, D., Morrow, H., Mei, F., and Watson, T.: Seven Years of
Aerosol Scattering Hygroscopic Growth Measurements from SGP: Factors
Influencing Water Uptake, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
9451–9466,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026804, 2017.
a,
b
Jiang, J., Kim, C., Wang, X., Stolzenburg, M. R., Kaufman, S. L., Qi, C., Sem,
G. J., Sakurai, H., Hama, N., and McMurry, P. H.: Aerosol Charge Fractions
Downstream of Six Bipolar Chargers: Effects of Ion Source,
Source Activity, and Flowrate, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48,
1207–1216,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.976333, 2014.
a
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Drewnick, F., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M. R.,
Middlebrook, A. M., Slowik, J. G., Zhang, Q., Coe, H., Jayne, J. T., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Comment on “The Effects of Molecular Weight and Thermal
Decomposition on the Sensitivity of a Thermal Desorption Aerosol Mass
Spectrometer”, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1205728, 2016.
a
Joutsensaari, J., Ozon, M., Nieminen, T., Mikkonen, S., Lähivaara, T., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Laaksonen, A., and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Identification of new particle formation events with deep learning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9597–9615,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9597-2018, 2018.
a
Jung, J. and Kawamura, K.: Hygroscopic properties of newly formed ultrafine particles at an urban site surrounded by deciduous forest (Sapporo, northern Japan) during the summer of 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7519–7531,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7519-2014, 2014.
a
Kandlikar, M. and Ramachandran, G.: Inverse Methods for Analysing Aerosol
Spectrometer Measurements: A Critical Review, J. Aerosol
Sci., 30, 413–437,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(98)00066-4, 1999.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Knutson, E. O. and Whitby, K. T.: Aerosol Classification by Electric Mobility:
Apparatus, Theory, and Applications, J. Aerosol Sci., 6, 443–451,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9, 1975.
a,
b
Krakauer, N. Y., Schneider, T., Randerson, J. T., and Olsen, S. C.: Using
Generalized Cross-Validation to Select Parameters in Inversions for Regional
Carbon Fluxes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L19108,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020323,
2004.
a
Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M., and Lohmann, U.: 100 Years of Progress
in Cloud Physics, Aerosols, and Aerosol Chemistry Research,
Meteorological Monographs, 59, 11.1–11.72,
https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-18-0024.1, 2019.
a
Kuang, C.: Scanning Mobility Particle Spectrometer Instrument Handbook,
Tech. Rep. DOE/SC-ARM-TR-147, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science,
ARM Climate Research Facility, 2016. a
Lampe, J., Reichel, L., and Voss, H.: Large-Scale Tikhonov Regularization
via Reduction by Orthogonal Projection, Special Issue dedicated to Danny
Sorensen's 65th birthday, 436, 2845–2865,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2011.07.019,
2012.
a
Lira, M., Iyer, R., Trindade, A. A., and Howle, V.: QR Versus Cholesky: A
Probabilistic Analysis, International Journal of Numerical Analysis and
Modeling, 1, 114–121, 2016. a
Lopez-Yglesias, X. F., Yeung, M. C., Dey, S. E., Brechtel, F. J., and Chan,
C. K.: Performance Evaluation of the Brechtel Mfg. Humidified
Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer (BMI HTDMA) for Studying
Hygroscopic Properties of Aerosol Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 969–980,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.952366, 2014.
a
Mahish, M., Jefferson, A., and Collins, R. D.: Influence of Common
Assumptions Regarding Aerosol Composition and Mixing State on
Predicted CCN Concentration, Atmosphere, 9,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9020054,
2018.
a,
b
Marinescu, P. J., Levin, E. J. T., Collins, D., Kreidenweis, S. M., and van den Heever, S. C.: Quantifying aerosol size distributions and their temporal variability in the Southern Great Plains, USA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11985–12006,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11985-2019, 2019.
a
Martin, A. C., Cornwell, G. C., Atwood, S. A., Moore, K. A., Rothfuss, N. E., Taylor, H., DeMott, P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D., and Prather, K. A.: Transport of pollution to a remote coastal site during gap flow from California's interior: impacts on aerosol composition, clouds, and radiative balance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1491–1509,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1491-2017, 2017.
a
Mikhailov, E., Vlasenko, S., Niessner, R., and Pöschl, U.: Interaction of aerosol particles composed of protein and saltswith water vapor: hygroscopic growth and microstructural rearrangement, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 323–350,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-323-2004, 2004.
a
Müller, D., Chemyakin, E., Kolgotin, A., Ferrare, R. A., Hostetler, C. A.,
and Romanov, A.: Automated, Unsupervised Inversion of Multiwavelength Lidar
Data with TiARA: Assessment of Retrieval Performance of Microphysical
Parameters Using Simulated Data, Appl. Opt., 58, 4981–5008,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.58.004981, 2019.
a,
b,
c
Oxford, C. R., Dang, A. J., Rapp, C. M., and Williams, B. J.: Interpretation of
Volatility Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer (V-TDMA) Data
for Accurate Vapor Pressure and Enthalpy Measurement: Operational
Considerations, Multiple Charging, and Introduction to a New Analysis Program
(TAO), Aerosol Sci. Tech., 54, 410–425,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1709617, 2020.
a
Ozon, M., Seppänen, A., Kaipio, J. P., and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Retrieval of process rate parameters in the general dynamic equation for aerosols using Bayesian state estimation: BAYROSOL1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3715–3739,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3715-2021, 2021a.
a
Ozon, M., Stolzenburg, D., Dada, L., Seppänen, A., and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Aerosol formation and growth rates from chamber experiments using Kalman smoothing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12595–12611,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12595-2021, 2021b.
a
Park, K., Dutcher, D., Emery, M., Pagels, J., Sakurai, H., Scheckman, J., Qian,
S., Stolzenburg, M. R., Wang, X., Yang, J., and McMurry, P. H.: Tandem
Measurements of Aerosol Properties – A Review of
Mobility Techniques with Extensions, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
42, 801–816,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802339561, 2008.
a,
b
Petters, M. D.: A Language to Simplify Computation of Differential Mobility
Analyzer Response Functions, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 1437–1451,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1530724, 2018.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k,
l,
m,
n,
o,
p,
q,
r,
s,
t,
u,
v,
w,
x
Rawat, V. K., Buckley, D. T., Kimoto, S., Lee, M.-H., Fukushima, N., and Hogan,
C. J.: Two Dimensional Size – Mass Distribution Function Inversion
from Differential Mobility Analyzer – Aerosol Particle Mass Analyzer
(DMA – APM) Measurements, J. Aerosol Sci., 92,
70–82,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.11.001, 2016.
a,
b,
c
Reineking, A. and Porstendörfer, J.: Measurements of Particle Loss
Functions in a Differential Mobility Analyzer (TSI, Model 3071)
for Different Flow Rates, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 5, 483–486,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828608959112, 1986.
a,
b,
c
Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol
Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys., 57, 187–249,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615, 2019.
a,
b
Royalty, T. M., Phillips, B. N., Dawson, K. W., Reed, R., Meskhidze, N., and
Petters, M. D.: Aerosol Properties Observed in the Subtropical North
Pacific Boundary Layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
9990–10,012,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026897, 2017.
a
Russell, L. M., Zhang, S.-H., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Stolzenburg,
M. R., and Caldow, R.: Radially Classified Aerosol Detector for
Aircraft-Based Submicron Aerosol Measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 13, 598–609,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0598:RCADFA>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
a
SGP SMPS Data: Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility. 2016, updated hourly, Scanning mobility particle sizer (AOSSMPS), 2020-01-01 to 2020-09-27, Southern Great Plains (SGP) Lamont, OK (Extended and Co-located with C1) (E13), edited by: Kuang, C., Salwen, C., Boyer, M., and Singh, A., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1095583, last access: 29 September 2020a.
SGP HTDMA Data: Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility. 2017, updated hourly. Humidified Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer (AOSHTDMA), 2020-01-01 to 2020-02-22, Southern Great Plains (SGP) Lamont, OK (Extended and Co-located with C1) (E13), edited by: Uin, J., Salwen, C., and Senum, G., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1095581, last access: 29 September 2020b.
Shen, C., Zhao, G., and Zhao, C.: Effects of multi-charge on aerosol hygroscopicity measurement by a HTDMA, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1293–1301,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1293-2021, 2021.
a,
b,
c,
d
Shingler, T., Sorooshian, A., Ortega, A., Crosbie, E., Wonaschütz, A.,
Perring, A. E., Beyersdorf, A., Ziemba, L., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost,
P., Mikoviny, T., Wisthaler, A., and Russell, L. M.: Ambient Observations of
Hygroscopic Growth Factor and f(RH) below 1: Case Studies from
Surface and Airborne Measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 13661–13677,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025471, 2016.
a
Sipkens, T., Olfert, J., and Rogak, S.: Inversion Methods to Determine
Two-Dimensional Aerosol Mass-Mobility Distributions: A Critical
Comparison of Established Methods, J. Aerosol Sci., 140, 105484,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.105484, 2020.
a,
b,
c
Stolzenburg, M. and McMurry, P. H.: TDMAfit User's Manual, Tech. Rep.
Technical Report, PTL Publication No. 653, University of Minnesota,
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Particle Technology Laboratory, 1988.
a,
b
Stolzenburg, M. R. and McMurry, P. H.: Equations Governing Single and
Tandem DMA Configurations and a New Lognormal Approximation to the
Transfer Function, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 421–432,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802157823, 2008.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Suda, S. R. and Petters, M. D.: Accurate Determination of Aerosol
Activity Coefficients at Relative Humidities up to 99% Using the
Hygroscopicity Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer Technique, Aerosol
Sci. Technol., 47, 991–1000,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.807906,
2013.
a
Swietlicki, E., Hansson, H. C., Hämeri, K., Svenningsson, B., Massling, A.,
Mcfiggans, G., Mcmurry, P. H., Petäjä, T., Tunved, P., Gysel, M.,
Topping, D., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Rissler, J., Wiedensohler,
A., and Kulmala, M.: Hygroscopic Properties of Submicrometer Atmospheric
Aerosol Particles Measured with H-TDMA Instruments in Various
Environments – a Review, Tellus B, 60, 432–469,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x, 2008.
a
Talukdar, S. S. and Swihart, M. T.: An Improved Data Inversion Program for
Obtaining Aerosol Size Distributions from Scanning Differential
Mobility Analyzer Data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 37, 145–161,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820300952, 2003.
a,
b,
c,
d
Tikhonov, A. N.: Solution of Incorrectly Formulated Problems and the
Regularization Method, Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 4, 1035–1038, 1963. a
Twomey, S.: On the Numerical Solution of Fredholm Integral Equations of the
First Kind by the Inversion of the Linear System Produced by Quadrature, J.
ACM, 10, 97–101, 1963. a
Uin, J. and Smith, S.: Southern Great Plains (SGP) Aerosol Observing
System (AOS) Instrument Handbook, Tech. Rep. DOE/SC-ARM-TR-267,
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, ARM Climate Research
Facility, 2020. a
Voutilainen, A., Kolehmainen, V., and Kaipio, J. P.: Statistical Inversion of
Aerosol Size Measurement Data, Inverse Problems in Engineering, 9, 67–94,
https://doi.org/10.1080/174159701088027753, 2001.
a,
b,
c
Wu, Z., Birmili, W., Poulain, L., Wang, Z., Merkel, M., Fahlbusch, B., van Pinxteren, D., Herrmann, H., and Wiedensohler, A.: Particle hygroscopicity during atmospheric new particle formation events: implications for the chemical species contributing to particle growth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6637–6646,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6637-2013, 2013.
a
Zhang, S.-H., Akutsu, Y., Russell, L. M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Radial Differential Mobility Analyzer, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
23, 357–372,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829508965320, 1995.
a
