Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 15, issue 8
Articles | Volume 15, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2407-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2407-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 8
Research article
 | 
20 Apr 2022
Research article |  | 20 Apr 2022

Satellite data validation: a parametrization of the natural variability of atmospheric mixing ratios

Alexandra Laeng, Thomas von Clarmann, Quentin Errera, Udo Grabowski, and Shawn Honomichl

Viewed

Total article views: 2,826 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,001 710 115 2,826 161 149
  • HTML: 2,001
  • PDF: 710
  • XML: 115
  • Total: 2,826
  • BibTeX: 161
  • EndNote: 149
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Dec 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,826 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,773 with geography defined and 53 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 30 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
In validation exercises, a universal excuse used to explain the residual discrepancy between the data is the natural atmospheric variability due to imperfect co-locations. This work is the first attempt to quantify this atmospheric variability for a large sample of atmospheric constituents and to provide the user with a tool to substract the natural atmospheric variability portion from the residual variability.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Towards Unified Error Reporting (TUNER)