Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-321-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-321-2022
Research article
 | 
21 Jan 2022
Research article |  | 21 Jan 2022

Evaluating uncertainty in sensor networks for urban air pollution insights

Daniel R. Peters, Olalekan A. M. Popoola, Roderic L. Jones, Nicholas A. Martin, Jim Mills, Elizabeth R. Fonseca, Amy Stidworthy, Ella Forsyth, David Carruthers, Megan Dupuy-Todd, Felicia Douglas, Katie Moore, Rishabh U. Shah, Lauren E. Padilla, and Ramón A. Alvarez

Viewed

Total article views: 3,215 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,232 911 72 3,215 241 53 60
  • HTML: 2,232
  • PDF: 911
  • XML: 72
  • Total: 3,215
  • Supplement: 241
  • BibTeX: 53
  • EndNote: 60
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,215 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,054 with geography defined and 161 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
We present more than 2 years of NO2 pollution measurements from a sensor network in Greater London and compare results to an extensive network of expensive reference-grade monitors. We show the ability of our lower-cost network to generate robust insights about local air pollution. We also show how irregularities in sensor performance lead to some uncertainty in results and demonstrate ways that future users can characterize and mitigate uncertainties to get the most value from sensor data.