Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3611-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3611-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
Research article
 | 
15 Jun 2022
Research article |  | 15 Jun 2022

Evaluation of two common source estimation measurement strategies using large-eddy simulation of plume dispersion under neutral atmospheric conditions

Anja Ražnjević, Chiel van Heerwaarden, and Maarten Krol

Viewed

Total article views: 1,518 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,048 419 51 1,518 36 38
  • HTML: 1,048
  • PDF: 419
  • XML: 51
  • Total: 1,518
  • BibTeX: 36
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Feb 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Feb 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,518 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,610 with geography defined and -92 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
We evaluate two widely used observational techniques (Other Test Method (OTM) 33A and car drive-bys) that estimate point source gas emissions. We performed our analysis on high-resolution plume dispersion simulation. For car drive-bys we found that at least 15 repeated measurements were needed to get within 40 % of the true emissions. OTM 33A produced large errors in estimation (50 %–200 %) due to its sensitivity to dispersion coefficients and underlying simplifying assumptions.
Read more