41 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Uncertainty in aerosol–cloud radiative forcing is driven by clean conditions E. Gryspeerdt et al.
2. Observational constraints suggest a smaller effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions C. Park et al.
3. Recent cloud trends and extremes reaffirm established bounds on cloud feedback and aerosol-cloud interactions M. Zelinka et al.
4. Machine learning reveals strong grid-scale dependence in the satellite Nd–LWP relationship M. Christensen et al.
5. Solving partial differential equations in participating media B. Miller et al.
6. Nonlinearity of the cloud response postpones climate penalty of mitigating air pollution in polluted regions H. Jia & J. Quaas
7. Observing short-timescale cloud development to constrain aerosol–cloud interactions E. Gryspeerdt et al.
8. Signatures of aerosol-cloud interactions in GiOcean: a coupled global reanalysis with two-moment cloud microphysics C. Song et al.
9. Impact of Cloud Condensation Nuclei Reduction on Cloud Characteristics and Solar Radiation during COVID-19 Lockdown 2020 in Moscow J. Shuvalova et al.
10. Regime-based aerosol–cloud interactions from CALIPSO-MODIS and the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 2 (E3SMv2) over the Eastern North Atlantic X. Zheng et al.
11. Global observations of aerosol indirect effects from marine liquid clouds C. Wall et al.
12. Longwave radiation responses to cloud property perturbations in blackbody clouds should not be assumed to be negligible A. Igel et al.
13. Constraining aerosol–cloud adjustments by uniting surface observations with a perturbed parameter ensemble A. Mikkelsen et al.
14. Stratocumulus adjustments to aerosol perturbations disentangled with a causal approach E. Fons et al.
15. Aircraft in-situ measurements from SOCRATES constrain the anthropogenic perturbations of cloud droplet number C. Song et al.
16. More biomass burning aerosol is being advected westward over the southern tropical Atlantic since 2003 T. Tatro & P. Zuidema
17. Model analysis of biases in the satellite-diagnosed aerosol effect on the cloud liquid water path H. Kokkola et al.
18. Radiative forcing from the 2020 shipping fuel regulation is large but hard to detect J. Zhang et al.
19. In situ and satellite-based estimates of cloud properties and aerosol–cloud interactions over the southeast Atlantic Ocean S. Gupta et al.
20. Sampling Bias From Satellite Retrieval Failures of Cloud Properties and Its Implications for Aerosol‐Cloud Interactions G. Choudhury & T. Goren
21. Analysis of the cloud fraction adjustment to aerosols and its dependence on meteorological controls using explainable machine learning Y. Jia et al.
22. Reduced aerosol pollution diminished cloud reflectivity over the North Atlantic and Northeast Pacific K. von Salzen et al.
23. Evaluation of liquid cloud albedo susceptibility in E3SM using coupled eastern North Atlantic surface and satellite retrievals A. Varble et al.
24. High sensitivity of cloud formation to aerosol changes A. Virtanen et al.
25. Cloud fraction response to aerosol driven by nighttime processes G. Pugsley et al.
26. Robust Susceptibility of Cloud Cover and Radiative Effects to Biases in Retrieved Droplet Concentrations Y. Wang et al.
27. Reconstructing albedo from mean cloud properties I. Wojciechowska & E. Gryspeerdt
28. Emission Reductions Significantly Reduce the Hemispheric Contrast in Cloud Droplet Number Concentration in Recent Two Decades Y. Cao et al.
29. Daytime variation in the aerosol indirect effect for warm marine boundary layer clouds in the eastern North Atlantic S. Qiu et al.
30. Evaluation of coupled and uncoupled ocean–ice–atmosphere simulations using icon-2024.07 and NEMOv4.2.0 for the EURO-CORDEX domain V. Maurer et al.
31. Optimal choice of proxy for cloud condensation nuclei reduces uncertainty in aerosol-cloud-climate forcing H. Jia et al.
32. Invisible ship tracks show large cloud sensitivity to aerosol P. Manshausen et al.
33. Aircraft evaluation of MODIS cloud drop number concentration retrievals S. Passer et al.
34. Strong aerosol indirect radiative effect from dynamic-driven diurnal variations of cloud water adjustments J. Li et al.
35. Characterizing low-supersaturation CCN activity with AAC-CCNC system at a mountain site in continental region in China M. An et al.
36. Frontiers in Satellite‐Based Estimates of Cloud‐Mediated Aerosol Forcing D. Rosenfeld et al.
37. In-plume and out-of-plume analysis of aerosol–cloud interactions derived from the 2014–2015 Holuhraun volcanic eruption A. Peace et al.
38. Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean C. Wall et al.
39. Negligible contribution from aerosols to recent trends in Earth’s energy imbalance C. Park & B. Soden
40. The sensitivity of Southern Ocean atmospheric dimethyl sulfide (DMS) to modeled oceanic DMS concentrations and emissions Y. Bhatti et al.
41. Observing the role of wind-driven processes in the evolution of warm marine cloud properties V. Nair et al.