Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 15, issue 14
Articles | Volume 15, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4307-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4307-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 14
Research article
 | 
28 Jul 2022
Research article |  | 28 Jul 2022

Impact of the revisit frequency on cloud climatology for CALIPSO, EarthCARE, Aeolus, and ICESat-2 satellite lidar missions

Andrzej Z. Kotarba

Viewed

Total article views: 2,269 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,513 668 88 2,269 85 99
  • HTML: 1,513
  • PDF: 668
  • XML: 88
  • Total: 2,269
  • BibTeX: 85
  • EndNote: 99
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Mar 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,269 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,231 with geography defined and 38 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Space profiling lidars offer a unique insight into cloud properties in Earth’s atmosphere, and are considered the most reliable source of cloud information. However, lidar-based cloud climatologies are infrequently sampled: every 7 to 91 d, and only along the ground track. This study evaluated how accurate are the cloud data from existing (CALIPSO, ICESat-2, Aeolus) and planned (EarthCARE) space lidars, when compared to a cloud climatology obtained with observations taken every day.
Read more
Share