Articles | Volume 15, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4307-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4307-2022
Research article
 | 
28 Jul 2022
Research article |  | 28 Jul 2022

Impact of the revisit frequency on cloud climatology for CALIPSO, EarthCARE, Aeolus, and ICESat-2 satellite lidar missions

Andrzej Z. Kotarba

Related authors

Evaluation of the operational MODIS cloud mask product for detecting cirrus clouds
Żaneta Nguyen Huu, Andrzej Z. Kotarba, and Agnieszka Wypych
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3897–3915, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3897-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3897-2025, 2025
Short summary
Satellite-based detection of deep-convective clouds: the sensitivity of infrared methods and implications for cloud climatology
Andrzej Z. Kotarba and Izabela Wojciechowska
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2721–2738, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2721-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2721-2025, 2025
Short summary
Calibration of global MODIS cloud amount using CALIOP cloud profiles
Andrzej Z. Kotarba
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4995–5012, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4995-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4995-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Evaluation of the operational MODIS cloud mask product for detecting cirrus clouds
Żaneta Nguyen Huu, Andrzej Z. Kotarba, and Agnieszka Wypych
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3897–3915, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3897-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3897-2025, 2025
Short summary
Optimizing cloud optical parameterizations in Radiative Transfer for TOVS (RTTOV v12.3) for data assimilation of satellite visible reflectance data: an assessment using observed and synthetic images
Yongbo Zhou, Tianrui Cao, and Lijian Zhu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3267–3285, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3267-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3267-2025, 2025
Short summary
Errors in stereoscopic retrievals of cloud top height for single-layer clouds
Jesse Loveridge and Larry Di Girolamo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3009–3033, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3009-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3009-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessment and application of melting-layer simulations for spaceborne radars within the RTTOV-SCATT v13.1 model
Rohit Mangla, Mary Borderies, Philippe Chambon, Alan Geer, and James Hocking
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2751–2779, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2751-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2751-2025, 2025
Short summary
A method to retrieve mixed-phase cloud vertical structure from airborne lidar
Ewan Crosbie, Johnathan W. Hair, Amin R. Nehrir, Richard A. Ferrare, Chris Hostetler, Taylor Shingler, David Harper, Marta Fenn, James Collins, Rory Barton-Grimley, Brian Collister, K. Lee Thornhill, Christiane Voigt, Simon Kirschler, and Armin Sorooshian
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2639–2658, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2639-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2639-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerman, S. A., Holz, R. E., Frey, R., Eloranta, E. W., Maddux, B. C., and McGill, M.: Cloud detection with MODIS. Part II: Validation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 25, 1073–1086, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA1053.1, 2008. 
Adhikari, L., Wang, Z., and Deng, M.: Seasonal variations of Antarctic clouds observed by CloudSat and CALIPSO satellites, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D04202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016719, 2012. 
Benas, N., Finkensieper, S., Stengel, M., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., Hanschmann, T., Hollmann, R., and Meirink, J. F.: The MSG-SEVIRI-based cloud property data record CLAAS-2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 415–434, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-415-2017, 2017. 
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Webb, M. J., Bony, S., Chepfer, H., Dufresne, J.-L., Klein, S. A., Zhang, Y., Marchand, R., Haynes, J. M., Pincus, R., and John, V. O.: COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1023–1043, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS2856.1, 2011. 
Boudala, F. S. and Milbrandt, J. A.: Evaluations of the Climatologies of Three Latest Cloud Satellite Products Based on Passive Sensors (ISCCP-H, Two CERES) against the CALIPSO-GOCCP, Remote Sens., 13, 5150, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13245150, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
Space profiling lidars offer a unique insight into cloud properties in Earth’s atmosphere, and are considered the most reliable source of cloud information. However, lidar-based cloud climatologies are infrequently sampled: every 7 to 91 d, and only along the ground track. This study evaluated how accurate are the cloud data from existing (CALIPSO, ICESat-2, Aeolus) and planned (EarthCARE) space lidars, when compared to a cloud climatology obtained with observations taken every day.
Share