Volume 15, issue 21

Volume 15, issue 21

01 Nov 2022
Intercomparison of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI cloud products for tropospheric trace gas retrievals
Miriam Latsch, Andreas Richter, Henk Eskes, Maarten Sneep, Ping Wang, Pepijn Veefkind, Ronny Lutz, Diego Loyola, Athina Argyrouli, Pieter Valks, Thomas Wagner, Holger Sihler, Michel van Roozendael, Nicolas Theys, Huan Yu, Richard Siddans, and John P. Burrows
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6257–6283, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6257-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6257-2022, 2022
Short summary
02 Nov 2022
A quantitative comparison of methods used to measure smaller methane emissions typically observed from superannuated oil and gas infrastructure
Stuart N. Riddick, Riley Ancona, Mercy Mbua, Clay S. Bell, Aidan Duggan, Timothy L. Vaughn, Kristine Bennett, and Daniel J. Zimmerle
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6285–6296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022, 2022
Short summary
02 Nov 2022
On the development of a new prototype PTR-ToF-MS instrument and its application to the detection of atmospheric amines
Alexander Håland, Tomáš Mikoviny, Elisabeth Emilie Syse, and Armin Wisthaler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6297–6307, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6297-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6297-2022, 2022
Short summary
02 Nov 2022
Calibrating networks of low-cost air quality sensors
Priyanka deSouza, Ralph Kahn, Tehya Stockman, William Obermann, Ben Crawford, An Wang, James Crooks, Jing Li, and Patrick Kinney
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6309–6328, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6309-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6309-2022, 2022
Short summary
03 Nov 2022
Intercomparison of airborne and surface-based measurements during the CLARIFY, ORACLES and LASIC field experiments
Paul A. Barrett, Steven J. Abel, Hugh Coe, Ian Crawford, Amie Dobracki, James Haywood, Steve Howell, Anthony Jones, Justin Langridge, Greg M. McFarquhar, Graeme J. Nott, Hannah Price, Jens Redemann, Yohei Shinozuka, Kate Szpek, Jonathan W. Taylor, Robert Wood, Huihui Wu, Paquita Zuidema, Stéphane Bauguitte, Ryan Bennett, Keith Bower, Hong Chen, Sabrina Cochrane, Michael Cotterell, Nicholas Davies, David Delene, Connor Flynn, Andrew Freedman, Steffen Freitag, Siddhant Gupta, David Noone, Timothy B. Onasch, James Podolske, Michael R. Poellot, Sebastian Schmidt, Stephen Springston, Arthur J. Sedlacek III, Jamie Trembath, Alan Vance, Maria A. Zawadowicz, and Jianhao Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6329–6371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022, 2022
Short summary
04 Nov 2022
Sizing ice hydrometeor populations using the dual-wavelength radar ratio
Sergey Y. Matrosov, Alexei Korolev, Mengistu Wolde, and Cuong Nguyen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6373–6386, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6373-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6373-2022, 2022
Short summary
08 Nov 2022
Long-distance propagation of 162 MHz shipping information links associated with sporadic E
Alex T. Chartier, Thomas R. Hanley, and Daniel J. Emmons
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6387–6393, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6387-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6387-2022, 2022
Short summary
08 Nov 2022
Harmonized retrieval of middle atmospheric ozone from two microwave radiometers in Switzerland
Eric Sauvageat, Eliane Maillard Barras, Klemens Hocke, Alexander Haefele, and Axel Murk
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6395–6417, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6395-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6395-2022, 2022
Short summary
08 Nov 2022
The effect of the averaging period for PMF analysis of aerosol mass spectrometer measurements during offline applications
Christina Vasilakopoulou, Iasonas Stavroulas, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, and Spyros N. Pandis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6419–6431, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6419-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6419-2022, 2022
Short summary
09 Nov 2022
Reactive uptake coefficients for multiphase reactions determined by a dynamic chamber system
Guo Li, Hang Su, Meng Li, Uwe Kuhn, Guangjie Zheng, Lei Han, Fengxia Bao, Ulrich Pöschl, and Yafang Cheng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6433–6446, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6433-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6433-2022, 2022
Short summary
11 Nov 2022
Technique for comparison of backscatter coefficients derived from in situ cloud probe measurements with concurrent airborne lidar
Shawn Wendell Wagner and David James Delene
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6447–6466, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6447-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6447-2022, 2022
Short summary
11 Nov 2022
Quality control and error assessment of the Aeolus L2B wind results from the Joint Aeolus Tropical Atlantic Campaign
Oliver Lux, Benjamin Witschas, Alexander Geiß, Christian Lemmerz, Fabian Weiler, Uwe Marksteiner, Stephan Rahm, Andreas Schäfler, and Oliver Reitebuch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6467–6488, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6467-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6467-2022, 2022
Short summary
11 Nov 2022
Retrieval of ice water path from the Microwave Humidity Sounder (MWHS) aboard FengYun-3B (FY-3B) satellite polarimetric measurements based on a deep neural network
Wenyu Wang, Zhenzhan Wang, Qiurui He, and Lanjie Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6489–6506, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6489-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6489-2022, 2022
Short summary
11 Nov 2022
Complementarity of wind measurements from co-located X-band weather radar and Doppler lidar
Jenna Ritvanen, Ewan O'Connor, Dmitri Moisseev, Raisa Lehtinen, Jani Tyynelä, and Ludovic Thobois
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6507–6519, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6507-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6507-2022, 2022
Short summary
CC BY 4.0