Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Zexia Duan
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Shaohui Zhou
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China
China Meteorological Administration Xiong'an Atmospheric Boundary Layer Key Laboratory, Xiong'an New Area, China
Zhiqiu Gao
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Viewed
Total article views: 2,809 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,969
729
111
2,809
123
136
HTML: 1,969
PDF: 729
XML: 111
Total: 2,809
BibTeX: 123
EndNote: 136
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Total article views: 2,059 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,536
435
88
2,059
111
124
HTML: 1,536
PDF: 435
XML: 88
Total: 2,059
BibTeX: 111
EndNote: 124
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Apr 2023)
Total article views: 750 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
433
294
23
750
12
12
HTML: 433
PDF: 294
XML: 23
Total: 750
BibTeX: 12
EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,809 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,755 with geography defined
and 54 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,059 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,006 with geography defined
and 53 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 750 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 749 with geography defined
and 1 with unknown origin.
In this paper, we used a random forest model to fill the observation gaps of the fluxes measured during 2015–2019. We found that the net radiation was the most important input variable. And we justified the reliability of the model. Further, it was revealed that the model performed better after relative humidity was removed from the input. Lastly, we compared the results of the model with those of three other machine learning models, and we found that the model outperformed all of them.
In this paper, we used a random forest model to fill the observation gaps of the fluxes measured...
