Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Zexia Duan
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Shaohui Zhou
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China
China Meteorological Administration Xiong'an Atmospheric Boundary Layer Key Laboratory, Xiong'an New Area, China
Zhiqiu Gao
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Viewed
Total article views: 2,611 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,857
653
101
2,611
112
117
HTML: 1,857
PDF: 653
XML: 101
Total: 2,611
BibTeX: 112
EndNote: 117
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Total article views: 1,903 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,453
372
78
1,903
101
107
HTML: 1,453
PDF: 372
XML: 78
Total: 1,903
BibTeX: 101
EndNote: 107
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Apr 2023)
Total article views: 708 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
404
281
23
708
11
10
HTML: 404
PDF: 281
XML: 23
Total: 708
BibTeX: 11
EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,611 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,551 with geography defined
and 60 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,903 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,846 with geography defined
and 57 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 708 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 705 with geography defined
and 3 with unknown origin.
In this paper, we used a random forest model to fill the observation gaps of the fluxes measured during 2015–2019. We found that the net radiation was the most important input variable. And we justified the reliability of the model. Further, it was revealed that the model performed better after relative humidity was removed from the input. Lastly, we compared the results of the model with those of three other machine learning models, and we found that the model outperformed all of them.
In this paper, we used a random forest model to fill the observation gaps of the fluxes measured...
