Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Zexia Duan
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Shaohui Zhou
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China
China Meteorological Administration Xiong'an Atmospheric Boundary Layer Key Laboratory, Xiong'an New Area, China
Zhiqiu Gao
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Viewed
Total article views: 2,222 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,606
534
82
2,222
84
99
HTML: 1,606
PDF: 534
XML: 82
Total: 2,222
BibTeX: 84
EndNote: 99
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Total article views: 1,582 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,222
300
60
1,582
74
91
HTML: 1,222
PDF: 300
XML: 60
Total: 1,582
BibTeX: 74
EndNote: 91
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Apr 2023)
Total article views: 640 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
384
234
22
640
10
8
HTML: 384
PDF: 234
XML: 22
Total: 640
BibTeX: 10
EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,222 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,171 with geography defined
and 51 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,582 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,531 with geography defined
and 51 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 640 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 640 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
In this paper, we used a random forest model to fill the observation gaps of the fluxes measured during 2015–2019. We found that the net radiation was the most important input variable. And we justified the reliability of the model. Further, it was revealed that the model performed better after relative humidity was removed from the input. Lastly, we compared the results of the model with those of three other machine learning models, and we found that the model outperformed all of them.
In this paper, we used a random forest model to fill the observation gaps of the fluxes measured...
