Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 16, issue 17
Articles | Volume 16, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4081-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4081-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 17
Research article
 | 
11 Sep 2023
Research article |  | 11 Sep 2023

Assessing Arctic low-level clouds and precipitation from above – a radar perspective

Imke Schirmacher, Pavlos Kollias, Katia Lamer, Mario Mech, Lukas Pfitzenmaier, Manfred Wendisch, and Susanne Crewell

Viewed

Total article views: 4,525 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,501 883 141 4,525 161 212
  • HTML: 3,501
  • PDF: 883
  • XML: 141
  • Total: 4,525
  • BibTeX: 161
  • EndNote: 212
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Apr 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Apr 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,525 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,525 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 May 2026
Download
Short summary
CloudSat’s relatively coarse spatial resolution, low sensitivity, and blind zone limit its assessment of Arctic low-level clouds, which affect the surface energy balance. We compare cloud fractions from CloudSat and finely resolved airborne radar observations to determine CloudSat’s limitations. Cloudsat overestimates cloud fractions above its blind zone, especially during cold-air outbreaks over open water, and misses a cloud fraction of 32 % and half of the precipitation inside its blind zone.
Read more
Share
Special issue
HALO-(AC)3 – an airborne campaign to study air...