Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 17, issue 9
Articles | Volume 17, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 9
Research article
 | 
07 May 2024
Research article |  | 07 May 2024

Intercomparison of eddy-covariance software for urban tall-tower sites

Changxing Lan, Matthias Mauder, Stavros Stagakis, Benjamin Loubet, Claudio D'Onofrio, Stefan Metzger, David Durden, and Pedro-Henrique Herig-Coimbra

Viewed

Total article views: 1,172 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
868 265 39 1,172 25 26
  • HTML: 868
  • PDF: 265
  • XML: 39
  • Total: 1,172
  • BibTeX: 25
  • EndNote: 26
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,172 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,135 with geography defined and 37 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Using eddy-covariance systems deployed in three cities, we aimed to elucidate the sources of discrepancies in flux estimations from different software packages. One crucial finding is the impact of low-frequency spectral loss corrections on tall-tower flux estimations. Our findings emphasize the significance of a standardized measurement setup and consistent postprocessing configurations in minimizing the systematic flux uncertainty resulting from the usage of different software packages.
Read more