Articles | Volume 17, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024
Research article
 | 
07 May 2024
Research article |  | 07 May 2024

Intercomparison of eddy-covariance software for urban tall-tower sites

Changxing Lan, Matthias Mauder, Stavros Stagakis, Benjamin Loubet, Claudio D'Onofrio, Stefan Metzger, David Durden, and Pedro-Henrique Herig-Coimbra

Related authors

The ATMONSYS water vapor DIAL: Advanced measurements of short-term variability in the planetary boundary layer
Johannes Speidel, Hannes Vogelmann, Andreas Behrendt, Diego Lange, Matthias Mauder, Jens Reichardt, and Kevin Wolz
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-168,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-168, 2024
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
Intercomparison of biogenic CO2 flux models in four urban parks in the city of Zurich
Stavros Stagakis, Dominik Brunner, Junwei Li, Leif Backman, Anni Karvonen, Lionel Constantin, Leena Järvi, Minttu Havu, Jia Chen, Sophie Emberger, and Liisa Kulmala
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2475,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2475, 2024
Short summary
The ASK-16 Motorized Glider: An Airborne Eddy Covariance Platform to measure Turbulence, Energy and Matter Fluxes
Inge Wiekenkamp, Anna Katharina Lehmann, Alexander Bütow, Jörg Hartmann, Stefan Metzger, Thomas Ruhtz, Christian Wille, Mathias Zöllner, and Torsten Sachs
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1586,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1586, 2024
Short summary
Comparing triple and single Doppler lidar wind measurements with sonic anemometer data based on a new filter strategy for virtual tower measurements
Kevin Wolz, Christopher Holst, Frank Beyrich, Eileen Päschke, and Matthias Mauder
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 205–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024, 2024
Short summary
Eddy-covariance with slow-response greenhouse gas analyser on tall towers: bridging atmospheric and ecosystem greenhouse gases networks
Pedro Henrique Herig Coimbra, Benjamin Loubet, Olivier Laurent, Laura Bignotti, Mathis Lozano, and Michel Ramonet
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-71,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-71, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Alternate materials for the capture and quantification of gaseous oxidized mercury in the atmosphere
Livia Lown, Sarrah M. Dunham-Cheatham, Seth N. Lyman, and Mae S. Gustin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6397–6413, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6397-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6397-2024, 2024
Short summary
Lower-cost eddy covariance for CO2 and H2O fluxes over grassland and agroforestry
Justus G. V. van Ramshorst, Alexander Knohl, José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas, Robert Clement, Timothy C. Hill, Lukas Siebicke, and Christian Markwitz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6047–6071, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6047-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6047-2024, 2024
Short summary
Towards a high quality in-situ observation network for oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) in Europe: transferring traceability to the International System of Units (SI) to the field
Maitane Iturrate-Garcia, Thérèse Salameh, Paul Schlauri, Annarita Baldan, Martin K. Vollmer, Evdokia Stratigou, Sebastian Dusanter, Jianrong Li, Stefan Persijn, Anja Claude, Rupert Holzinger, Christophe Sutour, Tatiana Macé, Yasin Elshorbany, Andreas Ackermann, Céline Pascale, and Stefan Reimann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2236,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2236, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of optimized flux chamber design for measurement of ammonia emission after field application of slurry with full-scale farm machinery
Johanna Pedersen, Sasha D. Hafner, Andreas Pacholski, Valthor I. Karlsson, Li Rong, Rodrigo Labouriau, and Jesper N. Kamp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4493–4505, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4493-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Methodology and uncertainty estimation for measurements of methane leakage in a manufactured house
Anna Karion, Michael F. Link, Rileigh Robertson, Tyler Boyle, and Dustin Poppendieck
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2129,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2129, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (Eds.): Eddy covariance: a practical guide to measurement and data analysis, Springer Science and Business Media, ISBN 978-94-007-2350-4, 2012. 
Biraud, S. and Chen, J.: Eddy Covariance Measurements in Urban Environments, White paper, AmeriFlux Urban Fluxes ad hoc committee, https://ameriflux.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/EC-in-Urban-Environment-2021-07-31-Final.pdf (last access: 3 May 2024), 2021. 
Brock, F. V.: A nonlinear filter to remove impulse noise from meteorological data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 3, 51–58, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1986)003<0051:ANFTRI>2.0.CO;2, 1986. 
C-40: C40 Cities, C-40 Cities Leadership Group, https://www.c40.org/ (last access: 2 May 2024), 2022. 
Cheng, X. L., Liu, X. M., Liu, Y. J., and Hu, F.: Characteristics of CO2 concentration and flux in the Beijing urban area, Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123, 1785–1801, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027409, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Using eddy-covariance systems deployed in three cities, we aimed to elucidate the sources of discrepancies in flux estimations from different software packages. One crucial finding is the impact of low-frequency spectral loss corrections on tall-tower flux estimations. Our findings emphasize the significance of a standardized measurement setup and consistent postprocessing configurations in minimizing the systematic flux uncertainty resulting from the usage of different software packages.