Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 17, issue 19
Articles | Volume 17, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5731-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5731-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 19
Research article
 | 
30 Sep 2024
Research article |  | 30 Sep 2024

Intercomparison of fast airborne ozone instruments to measure eddy covariance fluxes: spatial variability in deposition at the ocean surface and evidence for cloud processing

Randall Chiu, Florian Obersteiner, Alessandro Franchin, Teresa Campos, Adriana Bailey, Christopher Webster, Andreas Zahn, and Rainer Volkamer

Viewed

Total article views: 918 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
648 165 105 918 63 38 37
  • HTML: 648
  • PDF: 165
  • XML: 105
  • Total: 918
  • Supplement: 63
  • BibTeX: 38
  • EndNote: 37
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Oct 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Oct 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 918 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 943 with geography defined and -25 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The ozone sink into oceans and marine clouds is seldom studied and highly uncertain. Calculations suggest O3 destruction at aqueous surfaces (ocean, droplets) may be strongly accelerated, but field evidence is missing. Here we compare three fast airborne O3 instruments to measure eddy covariance fluxes of O3 over the remote ocean, in clear and cloudy air. We find O3 fluxes below clouds are consistently directed into clouds, while O3 fluxes into oceans are much smaller and spatially variable.
Read more