Articles | Volume 17, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6397-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6397-2024
Research article
 | 
06 Nov 2024
Research article |  | 06 Nov 2024

Alternate materials for the capture and quantification of gaseous oxidized mercury in the atmosphere

Livia Lown, Sarrah M. Dunham-Cheatham, Seth N. Lyman, and Mae S. Gustin

Viewed

Total article views: 1,677 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,262 319 96 1,677 84 123
  • HTML: 1,262
  • PDF: 319
  • XML: 96
  • Total: 1,677
  • BibTeX: 84
  • EndNote: 123
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,677 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,644 with geography defined and 33 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
New sorbent materials are needed to preconcentrate atmospheric oxidized mercury for analysis by developing mass spectrometry methods. Chitosan, α-Al2O3, and γ-Al2O3 were tested for quantitative gaseous oxidized mercury sorption in ambient air under laboratory and field conditions. Although these materials sorbed gaseous oxidized mercury without sorbing elemental mercury in the laboratory, less oxidized mercury was recovered from these materials compared to cation exchange membranes in the field.
Share