Articles | Volume 17, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
18 Dec 2024
Research article |
| 18 Dec 2024
| 18 Dec 2024
Sampling the diurnal and annual cycles of the Earth's energy imbalance with constellations of satellite-borne radiometers
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Thorsten Mauritsen
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Linda Megner
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Related authors
Kyriaki Bimpiri, Thomas Hocking, and Thorsten Mauritsen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-163, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-163, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Short summary
Observations show an increasing imbalance between how much energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and emits back to space, leading to climate change. We evaluate how well climate models simulate both the magnitude and trend of the imbalance. We find that models capture the magnitude but underestimate the trend, which is not related to how models handle volcanic aerosols when switching to future scenarios. The models that best simulate the magnitude are the ones with moderate climate sensitivity.
Thomas Hocking, Linda Megner, Maria Hakuba, and Thorsten Mauritsen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-829, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-829, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The imbalance between the energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and emits back to space gives rise to climate change, but measuring the small imbalance is challenging. The Earth surface reflects sunlight more in some directions than in others, as with e.g. ocean sunglint. We simulate satellites to investigate how this uneven reflection impacts estimates of the imbalance. We identify orbits that cover all directions well, so that the impact is small.
Andrea Mosso, Thomas Hocking, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12793–12806, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12793-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12793-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds play a crucial role in the Earth's energy balance, as they can either warm up or cool down the area they cover depending on their height and depth. They are expected to alter their behaviour under climate change, affecting the warming generated by greenhouse gases. This paper proposes a new method to estimate their overall effect on this warming by simulating a climate where clouds are transparent. Results show that with the model used, clouds have a stabilising effect on climate.
Paulo Ceppi, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Mark D. Zelinka, Timothy Andrews, Florent Brient, Robin Chadwick, Jonathan M. Gregory, Yen-Ting Hwang, Sarah M. Kang, Jennifer E. Kay, Thorsten Mauritsen, Tomoo Ogura, George Tselioudis, Masahiro Watanabe, Mark J. Webb, and Allison A. Wing
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-398, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-398, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds constitute a key uncertainty for climate change projections. The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) aims to address this challenge by evaluating and understanding clouds and their impacts on atmospheric circulation, precipitation, and climate sensitivity. The present paper describes the CFMIP experiment protocol for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 7 (CMIP7), and discusses the accompanying science questions and opportunities for progress.
Kyriaki Bimpiri, Thomas Hocking, and Thorsten Mauritsen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-163, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-163, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Short summary
Observations show an increasing imbalance between how much energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and emits back to space, leading to climate change. We evaluate how well climate models simulate both the magnitude and trend of the imbalance. We find that models capture the magnitude but underestimate the trend, which is not related to how models handle volcanic aerosols when switching to future scenarios. The models that best simulate the magnitude are the ones with moderate climate sensitivity.
Peter Dalin, Hidehiko Suzuki, Nikolay Pertsev, Vladimir Perminov, Linda Megner, Johan Kero, Peter Voelger, Jonas Hedin, Gerd Baumgarten, Anne Réchou, and Denis Efremov
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5757, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5757, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Short summary
A transatlantic scientific balloon flight (TRANSAT) was conducted in June 2024. The TRANSAT balloon floated in the stratosphere at approximately 40 km altitude between Sweden and Canada for about 4 days. An optical imager was installed on the TRANSAT balloon to study noctilucent cloud (NLC). Nearly continuous observations of NLC were obtained during the entire flight. A complex NLC structures exhibiting different motions were found to result from wind rotation with altitude between 80 and 94 km.
Linda Megner, Jörg Gumbel, Ole Martin Christensen, Björn Linder, Donal P. Murtagh, Nickolay Ivchenko, Lukas Krasauskas, Jonas Hedin, Joachim Dillner, Gabriel Giono, Georgi Olentsenko, Louis Kern, Joakim Möller, Ida-Sofia Skyman, and Jacek Stegman
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6869–6892, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6869-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6869-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The MATS satellite mission studies atmospheric gravity waves, crucial for momentum transport between atmospheric layers. Launched in November 2022, MATS uses a limb-viewing telescope to capture high-resolution images of noctilucent clouds and airglow, visualising wave patterns in the high atmosphere. This paper accompanies the public release of the Level 1b dataset, i.e. calibrated limb images. Later products will provide global maps of gravity wave properties, airglow, and noctilucent clouds.
Hans Segura, Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Philipp Weiss, Sebastian K. Müller, Thomas Rackow, Junhong Lee, Edgar Dolores-Tesillos, Imme Benedict, Matthias Aengenheyster, Razvan Aguridan, Gabriele Arduini, Alexander J. Baker, Jiawei Bao, Swantje Bastin, Eulàlia Baulenas, Tobias Becker, Sebastian Beyer, Hendryk Bockelmann, Nils Brüggemann, Lukas Brunner, Suvarchal K. Cheedela, Sushant Das, Jasper Denissen, Ian Dragaud, Piotr Dziekan, Madeleine Ekblom, Jan Frederik Engels, Monika Esch, Richard Forbes, Claudia Frauen, Lilli Freischem, Diego García-Maroto, Philipp Geier, Paul Gierz, Álvaro González-Cervera, Katherine Grayson, Matthew Griffith, Oliver Gutjahr, Helmuth Haak, Ioan Hadade, Kerstin Haslehner, Shabeh ul Hasson, Jan Hegewald, Lukas Kluft, Aleksei Koldunov, Nikolay Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Shunya Koseki, Sergey Kosukhin, Josh Kousal, Peter Kuma, Arjun U. Kumar, Rumeng Li, Nicolas Maury, Maximilian Meindl, Sebastian Milinski, Kristian Mogensen, Bimochan Niraula, Jakub Nowak, Divya Sri Praturi, Ulrike Proske, Dian Putrasahan, René Redler, David Santuy, Domokos Sármány, Reiner Schnur, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Dorian Spät, Birgit Sützl, Daisuke Takasuka, Adrian Tompkins, Alejandro Uribe, Mirco Valentini, Menno Veerman, Aiko Voigt, Sarah Warnau, Fabian Wachsmann, Marta Wacławczyk, Nils Wedi, Karl-Hermann Wieners, Jonathan Wille, Marius Winkler, Yuting Wu, Florian Ziemen, Janos Zimmermann, Frida A.-M. Bender, Dragana Bojovic, Sandrine Bony, Simona Bordoni, Patrice Brehmer, Marcus Dengler, Emanuel Dutra, Saliou Faye, Erich Fischer, Chiel van Heerwaarden, Cathy Hohenegger, Heikki Järvinen, Markus Jochum, Thomas Jung, Johann H. Jungclaus, Noel S. Keenlyside, Daniel Klocke, Heike Konow, Martina Klose, Szymon Malinowski, Olivia Martius, Thorsten Mauritsen, Juan Pedro Mellado, Theresa Mieslinger, Elsa Mohino, Hanna Pawłowska, Karsten Peters-von Gehlen, Abdoulaye Sarré, Pajam Sobhani, Philip Stier, Lauri Tuppi, Pier Luigi Vidale, Irina Sandu, and Bjorn Stevens
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 7735–7761, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7735-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7735-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Next Generation of Earth Modeling Systems project (nextGEMS) developed two Earth system models that use horizontal grid spacing of 10 km and finer, giving more fidelity to the representation of local phenomena, globally. In its fourth cycle, nextGEMS simulated the Earth System climate over the 2020–2049 period under the SSP3-7.0 scenario. Here, we provide an overview of nextGEMS, insights into the model development, and the realism of multi-decadal, kilometer-scale simulations.
Thomas Hocking, Linda Megner, Maria Hakuba, and Thorsten Mauritsen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-829, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-829, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The imbalance between the energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and emits back to space gives rise to climate change, but measuring the small imbalance is challenging. The Earth surface reflects sunlight more in some directions than in others, as with e.g. ocean sunglint. We simulate satellites to investigate how this uneven reflection impacts estimates of the imbalance. We identify orbits that cover all directions well, so that the impact is small.
Alejandro Uribe, Frida A.-M. Bender, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13371–13384, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13371-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13371-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores climate feedbacks, vital for understanding global warming. It links them to shifts in Earth's energy balance at the atmosphere's top due to natural temperature variations. It takes roughly 50 years to establish this connection. Combined satellite observations and reanalysis suggest that Earth cools more than expected under carbon dioxide influence. However, continuous satellite data until at least the mid-2030s are crucial for refining our understanding of climate feedbacks.
Andrea Mosso, Thomas Hocking, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12793–12806, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12793-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12793-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds play a crucial role in the Earth's energy balance, as they can either warm up or cool down the area they cover depending on their height and depth. They are expected to alter their behaviour under climate change, affecting the warming generated by greenhouse gases. This paper proposes a new method to estimate their overall effect on this warming by simulating a climate where clouds are transparent. Results show that with the model used, clouds have a stabilising effect on climate.
Martin Renoult, Navjit Sagoo, Johannes Hörner, and Thorsten Mauritsen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2981, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2981, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Geological evidence indicate persistent tropical sea-ice cover in the deep past, often called Snowball Earth. Using a climate model, we show here that clouds substantially cool down the tropics and facilitate the advance of sea-ice into lower latitudes. We identify a critical threshold temperature of 0 °C from where cooling down the Earth is accelerated. This value can be used as a constraint on Earth's sensitivity to CO2, as recent cold paleoclimates never entered Snowball Earth.
Antoine Hermant, Linnea Huusko, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10707–10715, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10707-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10707-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles, from natural and human sources, have a cooling effect on the climate, partially offsetting global warming. They do this through direct (sunlight reflection) and indirect (cloud property alteration) mechanisms. Using a global climate model, we found that, despite declining emissions, the direct effect of human aerosols has increased while the indirect effect has decreased, which is attributed to the shift in emissions from North America and Europe to Southeast Asia.
James D. Annan, Julia C. Hargreaves, Thorsten Mauritsen, Erin McClymont, and Sze Ling Ho
Clim. Past, 20, 1989–1999, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1989-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1989-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have created a new global surface temperature reconstruction of the climate of the mid-Pliocene Warm Period, representing the period roughly 3.2 million years before the present day. We estimate that the globally averaged mean temperature was around 3.9 °C warmer than it was in pre-industrial times, but there is significant uncertainty in this value.
Raphael Grodofzig, Martin Renoult, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 913–927, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-913-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-913-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate whether the Amazon rainforest has lost substantial resilience since 1990. This assertion is based on trends in the observational record of vegetation density. We calculate the same metrics in a large number of climate model simulations and find that several models behave indistinguishably from the observations, suggesting that the observed trend could be caused by internal variability and that the cause of the ongoing rapid loss of Amazon rainforest is not mainly global warming.
Björn Linder, Peter Preusse, Qiuyu Chen, Ole Martin Christensen, Lukas Krasauskas, Linda Megner, Manfred Ern, and Jörg Gumbel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3829–3841, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3829-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3829-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Swedish research satellite MATS (Mesospheric Airglow/Aerosol Tomography and Spectroscopy) is designed to study atmospheric waves in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. These waves perturb the temperature field, and thus, by observing three-dimensional temperature fluctuations, their properties can be quantified. This pre-study uses synthetic MATS data generated from a general circulation model to investigate how well wave properties can be retrieved.
Clare Marie Flynn, Linnea Huusko, Angshuman Modak, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15121–15133, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15121-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15121-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The latest-generation climate models show surprisingly cold mid-20th century global-mean temperatures, often despite exhibiting more realistic late 20th/early 21st century temperatures. A too-strong aerosol forcing in many models was thought to the be primary cause of these too-cold mid-century temperatures, but this was found to only be a partial explanation. This also partly undermines the hope to construct a strong relationship between the mid-century temperatures and aerosol forcing.
Sushant Das, Frida Bender, and Thorsten Mauritsen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1605, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1605, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Quantifying global and Indian precipitation responses to anthropogenic aerosol and CO2 forcings using multiple models is needed for reducing climate uncertainty. The response to global warming from CO2 increases precipitation both globally and over India, whereas the cooling response to sulfate aerosol leads to a reduction in precipitation in both cases. An opposite response to black carbon is noted i.e., a global decrease but an increase of precipitation over India implying changes in dynamics.
Angshuman Modak and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7535–7549, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7535-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We provide an improved estimate of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) constrained based on the instrumental temperature record including the corrections for the pattern effect. The improved estimate factors in the uncertainty caused by the underlying sea-surface temperature datasets used in the estimates of pattern effect. This together with the inter-model spread lifts the corresponding IPCC AR6 estimate to 3.2 K [1.8 to 11.0], which is lower and better constrained than in past studies.
Martin Renoult, Navjit Sagoo, Jiang Zhu, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Clim. Past, 19, 323–356, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-323-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-323-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The relationship between the Last Glacial Maximum and the sensitivity of climate models to a doubling of CO2 can be used to estimate the true sensitivity of the Earth. However, this relationship has varied in successive model generations. In this study, we assess multiple processes at the Last Glacial Maximum which weaken this relationship. For example, how models respond to the presence of ice sheets is a large contributor of uncertainty.
Cathy Hohenegger, Peter Korn, Leonidas Linardakis, René Redler, Reiner Schnur, Panagiotis Adamidis, Jiawei Bao, Swantje Bastin, Milad Behravesh, Martin Bergemann, Joachim Biercamp, Hendryk Bockelmann, Renate Brokopf, Nils Brüggemann, Lucas Casaroli, Fatemeh Chegini, George Datseris, Monika Esch, Geet George, Marco Giorgetta, Oliver Gutjahr, Helmuth Haak, Moritz Hanke, Tatiana Ilyina, Thomas Jahns, Johann Jungclaus, Marcel Kern, Daniel Klocke, Lukas Kluft, Tobias Kölling, Luis Kornblueh, Sergey Kosukhin, Clarissa Kroll, Junhong Lee, Thorsten Mauritsen, Carolin Mehlmann, Theresa Mieslinger, Ann Kristin Naumann, Laura Paccini, Angel Peinado, Divya Sri Praturi, Dian Putrasahan, Sebastian Rast, Thomas Riddick, Niklas Roeber, Hauke Schmidt, Uwe Schulzweida, Florian Schütte, Hans Segura, Radomyra Shevchenko, Vikram Singh, Mia Specht, Claudia Christine Stephan, Jin-Song von Storch, Raphaela Vogel, Christian Wengel, Marius Winkler, Florian Ziemen, Jochem Marotzke, and Bjorn Stevens
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 779–811, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-779-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-779-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Models of the Earth system used to understand climate and predict its change typically employ a grid spacing of about 100 km. Yet, many atmospheric and oceanic processes occur on much smaller scales. In this study, we present a new model configuration designed for the simulation of the components of the Earth system and their interactions at kilometer and smaller scales, allowing an explicit representation of the main drivers of the flow of energy and matter by solving the underlying equations.
James D. Annan, Julia C. Hargreaves, and Thorsten Mauritsen
Clim. Past, 18, 1883–1896, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-1883-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-1883-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We have created a new global surface temperature reconstruction of the climate of the Last Glacial Maximum, representing the period 19–23 000 years before the present day. We find that the globally averaged mean temperature was roughly 4.5 °C colder than it was in pre-industrial times, albeit there is significant uncertainty on this value.
Jule Radtke, Thorsten Mauritsen, and Cathy Hohenegger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3275–3288, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3275-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3275-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Shallow trade wind clouds are a key source of uncertainty to projections of the Earth's changing climate. We perform high-resolution simulations of trade cumulus and investigate how the representation and climate feedback of these clouds depend on the specific grid spacing. We find that the cloud feedback is positive when simulated with kilometre but near zero when simulated with hectometre grid spacing. These findings suggest that storm-resolving models may exaggerate the trade cloud feedback.
Cited articles
Campbell, G. and Vonder Harr, T.: Optimum satellite orbits for accurate measurement of the earth's radiation budget, summary, Atmospheric Science Paper 289, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University and NASA Langley Research Center, http://hdl.handle.net/10217/50 (last access: 7 July 2024), 1978. a, b
Cheng, L., von Schuckmann, K., Abraham, J. P., Trenberth, K. E., Mann, M. E., Zanna, L., England, M. H., Zika, J. D., Fasullo, J. T., Yu, Y., Pan, Y., Zhu, J., Newsom, E. R., Bronselaer, B., and Lin, X.: Past and future ocean warming, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 3, 776–794, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00345-1, 2022. a
Danjon, A.: Recherches de photométrie astronomique, Annales de l'Observatoire de Strasbourg, vol. 2, 1-185 pp., https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1928AnOSt...2....1D (last access: 26 August 2024), 1928. a
Danjon, A.: Nouvelles recherches sur la photométrie de la lumière cendrée et l'albedo de la terre, Annalen der Kaiserlichen Universitats-Sternwarte in Strassburg, 3, 139–179, 1936. a
Doelling, D. R., Loeb, N. G., Keyes, D. F., Nordeen, M. L., Morstad, D., Nguyen, C., Wielicki, B. A., Young, D. F., and Sun, M.: Geostationary Enhanced Temporal Interpolation for CERES Flux Products, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 30, 1072–1090, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00136.1, 2013. a, b
Forster, P., Storelvmo, T., Armour, K., Collins, W., Dufresne, J.-L., Frame, D., Lunt, D., Mauritsen, T., Palmer, M., Watanabe, M., Wild, M., and Zhang, H.: The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity, in: Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 943–1054 pp., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.009, 2021. a
Goode, P. R., Qiu, J., Yurchyshyn, V., Hickey, J., Chu, M.-C., Kolbe, E., Brown, C. T., and Koonin, S. E.: Earthshine observations of the Earth's reflectance, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1671–1674, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012580, 2001. a
Green, R. N. and Smith, G. L.: Shortwave Shape Factor Inversion of Earth Radiation Budget Observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 390–402, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<0390:SSFIOE>2.0.CO;2, 1991. a
Green, R. N., House, F. B., Stackhouse, P. W., Wu, X., Ackerman, S. A., Smith, W. L., and Johnson, M. J.: Intercomparison of scanner and nonscanner measurements for the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 95, 11785–11798, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD08p11785, 1990. a
Gristey, J. J., Chiu, J. C., Gurney, R. J., Han, S.-C., and Morcrette, C. J.: Determination of global Earth outgoing radiation at high temporal resolution using a theoretical constellation of satellites, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 1114–1131, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025514, 2017. a, b
Gristey, J. J., Schmidt, K. S., Chen, H., Feldman, D. R., Kindel, B. C., Mauss, J., van den Heever, M., Hakuba, M. Z., and Pilewskie, P.: Angular sampling of a monochromatic, wide-field-of-view camera to augment next-generation Earth radiation budget satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3609–3630, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3609-2023, 2023. a
Hakuba, M. Z., Frederikse, T., and Landerer, F. W.: Earth's Energy Imbalance From the Ocean Perspective (2005–2019), Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093624, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093624, 2021. a
Hakuba, M. Z., Reynerson, C. M., Quadrelli, M. B., Wiese, D. N., Mccullough, C., Landerer, F. W., and Stephens, G. L.: Measuring Earth's Energy Imbalance via Radiation Pressure Accelerations Experienced in Orbit: Initial Simulations for “Space Balls”, in: 2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 1–10 pp., https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115678, 2023. a
Hakuba, M. Z., Kindel, B., Gristey, J., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Stephens, G., and Pilewskie, P.: Simulated variability in visible and near-IR irradiances in preparation for the upcoming Libera mission, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2988, 050006, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0183869, 2024. a
Hocking, T.: Scripts for simulating wide-field-of-view satellite measurements of top-of-atmosphere radiation fields, Bolin Centre Code Repository [code], https://doi.org/10.57669/hocking-2024-sampling-eei-cycles-1.0.0, 2024. a
House, F. B., Gruber, A., Hunt, G. E., and Mecherikunnel, A. T.: History of satellite missions and measurements of the Earth Radiation Budget (1957–1984), Rev. Geophys., 24, 357–377, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG024i002p00357, 1986. a, b
Hunt, G. E., Kandel, R., and Mecherikunnel, A. T.: A history of presatellite investigations of the Earth's Radiation Budget, Rev. Geophys., 24, 351–356, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG024i002p00351, 1986. a, b
IERS Convention Centre: IERS Conventions (IERS Technical Note No. 36), https://www.iers.org/IERS/EN/Publications/TechnicalNotes/tn36.html (last access: 6 July 2024), 2010. a
Kaplan, G. H.: The IAU Resolutions on Astronomical Reference Systems, Time Scales, and Earth Rotation Models, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0602086, 2006. a
Kirk-Davidoff, D. B., Goody, R. M., and Anderson, J. G.: Analysis of Sampling Errors for Climate Monitoring Satellites, J. Climate, 18, 810–822, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3301.1, 2005. a, b
Kramer, R. J., He, H., Soden, B. J., Oreopoulos, L., Myhre, G., Forster, P. M., and Smith, C. J.: Observational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative Forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091585, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091585, 2021. a
Loeb, N. G., Kato, S., and Wielicki, B. A.: Defining Top-of-the-Atmosphere Flux Reference Level for Earth Radiation Budget Studies, J. Climate, 15, 3301–3309, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<3301:DTOTAF>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Loeb, N. G., Manalo-Smith, N., Kato, S., Miller, W. F., Gupta, S. K., Minnis, P., and Wielicki, B. A.: Angular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Satellite. Part I: Methodology, J. Appl. Meteorol., 42, 240–265, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0240:ADMFTO>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a
Loeb, N. G., Kato, S., Loukachine, K., and Manalo-Smith, N.: Angular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Terra Satellite. Part I: Methodology, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 22, 338–351, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1712.1, 2005. a
Loeb, N. G., Doelling, D. R., Wang, H., Su, W., Nguyen, C., Corbett, J. G., Liang, L., Mitrescu, C., Rose, F. G., and Kato, S.: Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product, J. Climate, 31, 895–918, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0208.1, 2018a. a
Loeb, N. G., Su, W., Doelling, D., Wong, T., Minnis, P., Thomas, S., and Miller, W.: 5.03 - Earth’s Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Budget, in: Comprehensive Remote Sensing, edited by: Liang, S., 67–84 pp., Elsevier, Oxford, ISBN 978-0-12-803221-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10367-7, 2018b. a
Loeb, N. G., Johnson, G. C., Thorsen, T. J., Lyman, J. M., Rose, F. G., and Kato, S.: Satellite and Ocean Data Reveal Marked Increase in Earth’s Heating Rate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093047, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093047, 2021. a
Marti, F., Blazquez, A., Meyssignac, B., Ablain, M., Barnoud, A., Fraudeau, R., Jugier, R., Chenal, J., Larnicol, G., Pfeffer, J., Restano, M., and Benveniste, J.: Monitoring the ocean heat content change and the Earth energy imbalance from space altimetry and space gravimetry, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 229–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-229-2022, 2022. a
Meyssignac, B., Ablain, M., Guérou, A., Prandi, P., Barnoud, A., Blazquez, A., Fourest, S., Rousseau, V., Bonnefond, P., Cazenave, A., Chenal, J., Dibarboure, G., Donlon, C., Benveniste, J., Sylvestre-Baron, A., and Vinogradova, N.: How accurate is accurate enough for measuring sea-level rise and variability, Nat. Clim. Change, 13, 796–803, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01735-z, 2023. a
Mishchenko, M. I., Lock, J. A., Lacis, A. A., Travis, L. D., and Cairns, B.: First-principles definition and measurement of planetary electromagnetic-energy budget, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 33, 1126–1132, https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.33.001126, 2016. a
NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC: CERES and GEO-Enhanced TOA, Within-Atmosphere and Surface Fluxes, Clouds and Aerosols 1-Hourly Terra-Aqua Edition4A [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/TERRA+AQUA/CERES/SYN1DEG-1HOUR_L3.004A, 2017. a, b
Raghuraman, S. P., Paynter, D., and Ramaswamy, V.: Anthropogenic forcing and response yield observed positive trend in Earth’s energy imbalance, Nat. Commun., 12, 4577, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24544-4, 2021. a
Rees, W. G.: Physical Principles of Remote Sensing, Cambridge University Press, 3 Edn., https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017411, 2012. a
Rhodes, B.: Python sgp4 library, Python Software Foundation [code], https://pypi.org/project/sgp4/ (last access: 12 June 2023), 2023. a
Salby, M. L.: Asynoptic Sampling Considerations for Wide-Field-of-View Measurements of Outgoing Radiation. Part II: Diurnal and Random Space-Time Variability, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 1184–1204, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<1184:ASCFWF>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a
Schifano, L., Smeesters, L., Geernaert, T., Berghmans, F., and Dewitte, S.: Design and Analysis of a Next-Generation Wide Field-of-View Earth Radiation Budget Radiometer, Remote Sens., 12, 425, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030425, 2020. a, b
Shaw, N.: Volume I Meteorology in history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, https://archive.org/details/manualofmeteorol01shawuoft/page/n5/mode/2up (last access: 20 January 2024), 1926. a
Smith, G. L. and Green, R. N.: Deconvolution of Wide Field-of-View Radiometer Measurements of Earth-Emitted Radiation. Part I: Theory, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 461–473, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038<0461:DOWFOV>2.0.CO;2, 1981. a
Smith, G. L., Harrison, E. F., and Gibson, G. G.: Earth Radiation Budget Research at the NASA Langley Research Center, Special Publication NASA/SP-2014-619, NASA Langley Research Center, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140006546 (last access: 7 July 2024), 2014. a
Stephens, G. L., O'Brien, D., Webster, P. J., Pilewski, P., Kato, S., and Li, J.-l.: The albedo of Earth, Rev. Geophys., 53, 141–163, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000449, 2015. a
Swartz, W. H., Lorentz, S. R., Papadakis, S. J., Huang, P. M., Smith, A. W., Deglau, D. M., Yu, Y., Reilly, S. M., Reilly, N. M., and Anderson, D. E.: RAVAN: CubeSat Demonstration for Multi-Point Earth Radiation Budget Measurements, Remote Sens., 11, 796, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070796, 2019. a
Taylor, P. C. and Loeb, N. G.: Impact of Sun-Synchronous Diurnal Sampling on Tropical TOA Flux Interannual Variability and Trends, J. Climate, 26, 2184–2191, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00416.1, 2013. a
Vallado, D. and Crawford, P.: SGP4 Orbit Determination, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, 18 August 2008–21 August 2008, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-6770, 2008. a, b
Vallado, D., Crawford, P., Hujsak, R., and Kelso, T.: Revisiting Spacetrack Report #3, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Colorado, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6753, 2006. a, b, c
von Schuckmann, K., Minière, A., Gues, F., Cuesta-Valero, F. J., Kirchengast, G., Adusumilli, S., Straneo, F., Ablain, M., Allan, R. P., Barker, P. M., Beltrami, H., Blazquez, A., Boyer, T., Cheng, L., Church, J., Desbruyeres, D., Dolman, H., Domingues, C. M., García-García, A., Giglio, D., Gilson, J. E., Gorfer, M., Haimberger, L., Hakuba, M. Z., Hendricks, S., Hosoda, S., Johnson, G. C., Killick, R., King, B., Kolodziejczyk, N., Korosov, A., Krinner, G., Kuusela, M., Landerer, F. W., Langer, M., Lavergne, T., Lawrence, I., Li, Y., Lyman, J., Marti, F., Marzeion, B., Mayer, M., MacDougall, A. H., McDougall, T., Monselesan, D. P., Nitzbon, J., Otosaka, I., Peng, J., Purkey, S., Roemmich, D., Sato, K., Sato, K., Savita, A., Schweiger, A., Shepherd, A., Seneviratne, S. I., Simons, L., Slater, D. A., Slater, T., Steiner, A. K., Suga, T., Szekely, T., Thiery, W., Timmermans, M.-L., Vanderkelen, I., Wjiffels, S. E., Wu, T., and Zemp, M.: Heat stored in the Earth system 1960–2020: where does the energy go?, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1675–1709, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023, 2023. a, b
Vonder Harr, T. H. and Smith, E. A.: Theoretical comparison between radiometric and radiation pressure measurements for determination of the Earth's radiation budget: for the European Space Agency headquarters, Paris, France, Atmospheric Science Paper 315, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, http://hdl.handle.net/10217/242 (last access: 7 July 2024), 1979. a
Wielicki, B. A., Barkstrom, B. R., Harrison, E. F., Lee, R. B., Smith, G. L., and Cooper, J. E.: Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An Earth Observing System Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 853–868, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0853:CATERE>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Wong, A. P. S., Wijffels, S. E., Riser, S. C., Pouliquen, S., Hosoda, S., Roemmich, D., Gilson, J., Johnson, G. C., Martini, K., Murphy, D. J., Scanderbeg, M., Bhaskar, T. V. S. U., Buck, J. J. H., Merceur, F., Carval, T., Maze, G., Cabanes, C., André, X., Poffa, N., Yashayaev, I., Barker, P. M., Guinehut, S., Belbéoch, M., Ignaszewski, M., Baringer, M. O., Schmid, C., Lyman, J. M., McTaggart, K. E., Purkey, S. G., Zilberman, N., Alkire, M. B., Swift, D., Owens, W. B., Jayne, S. R., Hersh, C., Robbins, P., West-Mack, D., Bahr, F., Yoshida, S., Sutton, P. J. H., Cancouët, R., Coatanoan, C., Dobbler, D., Juan, A. G., Gourrion, J., Kolodziejczyk, N., Bernard, V., Bourlès, B., Claustre, H., D'Ortenzio, F., Le Reste, S., Le Traon, P.-Y., Rannou, J.-P., Saout-Grit, C., Speich, S., Thierry, V., Verbrugge, N., Angel-Benavides, I. M., Klein, B., Notarstefano, G., Poulain, P.-M., Vélez-Belchí, P., Suga, T., Ando, K., Iwasaska, N., Kobayashi, T., Masuda, S., Oka, E., Sato, K., Nakamura, T., Sato, K., Takatsuki, Y., Yoshida, T., Cowley, R., Lovell, J. L., Oke, P. R., van Wijk, E. M., Carse, F., Donnelly, M., Gould, W. J., Gowers, K., King, B. A., Loch, S. G., Mowat, M., Turton, J., Rama Rao, E. P., Ravichandran, M., Freeland, H. J., Gaboury, I., Gilbert, D., Greenan, B. J. W., Ouellet, M., Ross, T., Tran, A., Dong, M., Liu, Z., Xu, J., Kang, K., Jo, H., Kim, S.-D., and Park, H.-M.: Argo Data 1999–2019: Two Million Temperature-Salinity Profiles and Subsurface Velocity Observations From a Global Array of Profiling Floats, Front. Mar. Sci., 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00700, 2020. a
Wong, T., Smith, G. L., Kato, S., Loeb, N. G., Kopp, G., and Shrestha, A. K.: On the Lessons Learned From the Operations of the ERBE Nonscanner Instrument in Space and the Production of the Nonscanner TOA Radiation Budget Data Set, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 56, 5936–5947, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2828783, 2018. a
Young, D. F., Minnis, P., Doelling, D. R., Gibson, G. G., and Wong, T.: Temporal Interpolation Methods for the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Experiment, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37, 572–590, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037<0572:TIMFTC>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Zhang, Y., Bi, S., and Wu, J.: Effect of Temporal Sampling Interval on the Irradiance for Moon-Based Wide Field-of-View Radiometer, Sensors, 22, 1581, https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041581, 2022. a
Zhang, Y., Dewitte, S., and Bi, S.: A Model for Estimating the Earth's Outgoing Radiative Flux from A Moon-Based Radiometer, Remote Sens., 15, 3773, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153773, 2023. a
Short summary
The imbalance between the energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and the energy the Earth emits back into space gives rise to climate change, but measuring the small imbalance is challenging. We simulate satellites in various orbits to investigate how well they sample the imbalance and find that the best option is to combine at least two satellites that see complementary parts of the Earth and cover the daily and annual cycles. This information is useful when planning future satellite missions.
The imbalance between the energy the Earth absorbs from the Sun and the energy the Earth emits...
