Articles | Volume 18, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4003-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4003-2025
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
27 Aug 2025
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 27 Aug 2025

Comment on “Design study for an airborne N2O lidar” by Kiemle et al. (2024)

Joel F. Campbell, Bing Lin, and Zhaoyan Liu

Viewed

Total article views: 417 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
355 43 19 417 19 45
  • HTML: 355
  • PDF: 43
  • XML: 19
  • Total: 417
  • BibTeX: 19
  • EndNote: 45
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Apr 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Apr 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 417 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 398 with geography defined and 19 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Aug 2025
Short summary
This is a reply to a recent article by Christoph Kiemle et al., critical of CO2 measurements using continuous-wave (CW) lidar. We show CW lidar is not only capable of measuring range but also capable of measuring range to the required accuracy without the aid of an external altimeter.
Share