Brooks, I. M. and Fowler, A. M.: An evaluation of boundary-layer depth, inversion and entrainment parameters by large-eddy simulation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 142, 245–263,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9668-3, 2012.
a
Caicedo, V., Delgado, R., Sakai, R., Knepp, T., Williams, D., Cavender, K., Lefer, B., and Szykman, J.: An automated common algorithm for planetary boundary layer retrievals using aerosol lidars in support of the U.S. EPA Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations Program, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 37, 1847–1864,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0050.1, 2020.
a
Christopoulos, J. A., Saide, P. E., Ferrare, R., Collister, B., Barton-Grimley, R. A., Scarino, A. J., Collins, J., Hair, J. W., and Nehrir, A.: Improving planetary boundary layer height rstimation from airborne lidar instruments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042538,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042538, 2025.
a
Chu, Y., Li, J., Li, C., Tan, W., Su, T., and Li, J.: Seasonal and diurnal variability of planetary boundary layer height in Beijing: Intercomparison between MPL and WRF results, Atmos. Res., 227, 1–13,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.04.017, 2019.
a,
b
Chu, Y., Wang, Z., Xue, L., Deng, M., Lin, G., Xie, H., Shin, H. H., Li, W., Firl, G., D'Amico, D. F., Liu, D., and Wang, Y.: Characterizing warm atmospheric boundary layer over land by combining Raman and Doppler lidar measurements, Opt. Express, 30, 11892–11911,
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.451728, 2022.
a
Cohen, A. E., Cavallo, S. M., Coniglio, M. C., and Brooks, H. E.: A review of planetary boundary layer parameterization schemes and their sensitivity in simulating southeastern U.S. cold season severe weather environments, Weather Forecast., 30, 591–612,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00105.1, 2015.
a
Colberg, L., Cruikshank, O., and Repasky, K. S.: Planetary boundary layer height retrieval from a diode-laser-based high spectral resolution lidar, J. Appl. Remote Sens., 16, 024507,
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.16.024507, 2022.
a,
b,
c
Collaud Coen, M., Praz, C., Haefele, A., Ruffieux, D., Kaufmann, P., and Calpini, B.: Determination and climatology of the planetary boundary layer height above the Swiss plateau by in situ and remote sensing measurements as well as by the COSMO-2 model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13205–13221,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13205-2014, 2014.
a,
b
Comerón, A., Sicard, M., and Rocadenbosch, F.: Wavelet correlation transform method and gradient method to determine aerosol layering from lidar returns: Some comments, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 30, 1189–1193,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00233.1, 2013.
a
Coniglio, M. C., Correia, J., Marsh, P. T., and Kong, F.: Verification of convection-allowing WRF model forecasts of the planetary boundary layer using sounding observations, Weather Forecast., 28, 842–862,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-12-00103.1, 2013.
a
Crameri, F., Shephard, G. E., and Heron, P. J.: The misuse of colour in science communication, Nat. Commun., 11, 5444,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19160-7, 2020.
a
Dang, R., Yang, Y., Hu, X.-M., Wang, Z., and Zhang, S.: A review of techniques for diagnosing the atmospheric boundary layer height (ABLH) using aerosol lidar data, Remote Sens., 11,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131590, 2019a.
a,
b
Dang, R., Yang, Y., Li, H., Hu, X.-M., Wang, Z., Huang, Z., Zhou, T., and Zhang, T.: Atmosphere boundary layer height (ABLH) determination under multiple-layer conditions using micro-pulse lidar, Remote Sens., 11,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030263, 2019b.
a
Dang, R., Qiu, X., Yang, Y., and Zhang, S.: Observation system simulation experiments (OSSEs) for assimilation of the planetary boundary-layer height (PBLH) using the EnSRF technique, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 148, 1184–1207,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4254, 2022.
a
Davis, K. J., Gamage, N., Hagelberg, C. R., Kiemle, C., Lenschow, D. H., and Sullivan, P. P.: An objective method for deriving atmospheric structure from airborne lidar observations, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 17, 1455–1468,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1455:AOMFDA>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
a
de Arruda Moreira, G., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Benavent-Oltra, J. A., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Román, R., Bedoya-Velásquez, A. E., Landulfo, E., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Study of the planetary boundary layer by microwave radiometer, elastic lidar and Doppler lidar estimations in Southern Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Res., 213, 185–195,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.007, 2018.
a
de Arruda Moreira, G., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Benavent-Oltra, J. A., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Román, R., E. Bedoya-Velásquez, A., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Olmo Reyes, F. J., Landulfo, E., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Analyzing the turbulent planetary boundary layer by remote sensing systems: the Doppler wind lidar, aerosol elastic lidar and microwave radiometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1263–1280,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1263-2019, 2019.
a
de Arruda Moreira, G., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Foyo-Moreno, I., Cazorla, A., Alados, I., Lyamani, H., Landulfo, E., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Study of the planetary boundary layer height in an urban environment using a combination of microwave radiometer and ceilometer, Atmos. Res., 240, 104932,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104932, 2020.
a
de Bruine, M., Apituley, A., Donovan, D. P., Klein Baltink, H., and de Haij, M. J.: Pathfinder: applying graph theory to consistent tracking of daytime mixed layer height with backscatter lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1893–1909,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1893-2017, 2017.
a
Deardorff, J. W., Willis, G. E., and Stockton, B. H.: Laboratory studies of the entrainment zone of a convectively mixed layer, J. Fluid Mech., 100, 41–64,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112080001000, 1980.
a
Dowell, D. C., Alexander, C. R., James, E. P., Weygandt, S. S., Benjamin, S. G., Manikin, G. S., Blake, B. T., Brown, J. M., Olson, J. B., Hu, M., Smirnova, T. G., Ladwig, T., Kenyon, J. S., Ahmadov, R., Turner, D. D., Duda, J. D., and Alcott, T. I.: The High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR): an hourly updating convection-allowing forecast model. Part I: motivation and system description, Weather Forecast., 37, 1371–1395,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0151.1, 2022.
a,
b
Duncan Jr., J. B., Bianco, L., Adler, B., Bell, T., Djalalova, I. V., Riihimaki, L., Sedlar, J., Smith, E. N., Turner, D. D., Wagner, T. J., and Wilczak, J. M.: Evaluating convective planetary boundary layer height estimations resolved by both active and passive remote sensing instruments during the CHEESEHEAD19 field campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2479–2502,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2479-2022, 2022.
a,
b
Fernald, F. G., Herman, B. M., and Reagan, J. A.: Determination of aerosol height distributions by lidar, J. Appl. Meteorol., 11, 482–489,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<0482:DOAHDB>2.0.CO;2, 1972.
a
Fochesatto, G. J., Drobinski, P., Flamant, C., Guedalia, D., Sarrat, C., Flamant, P. H., and Pelon, J.: Evidence of dynamical coupling between the residual layer and the developing convective boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 99, 451–464,
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018935129006, 2001.
a
Gan, C.-M., Wu, Y., Madhavan, B. L., Gross, B., and Moshary, F.: Application of active optical sensors to probe the vertical structure of the urban boundary layer and assess anomalies in air quality model PM2.5 forecasts, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6613–6621,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.013, 2011.
a
Guo, J., Zhang, J., Yang, K., Liao, H., Zhang, S., Huang, K., Lv, Y., Shao, J., Yu, T., Tong, B., Li, J., Su, T., Yim, S. H. L., Stoffelen, A., Zhai, P., and Xu, X.: Investigation of near-global daytime boundary layer height using high-resolution radiosondes: first results and comparison with ERA5, MERRA-2, JRA-55, and NCEP-2 reanalyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17079–17097,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17079-2021, 2021.
a,
b,
c
Haeffelin, M., Angelini, F., Morille, Y., Martucci, G., Frey, S., Gobbi, G. P., Lolli, S., O’Dowd, C. D., Sauvage, L., Xueref-Rémy, I., Wastine, B., and Feist, D. G.: Evaluation of mixing-height retrievals from automatic profiling lidars and ceilometers in view of future integrated networks in Europe, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 143, 49–75,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9643-z, 2012.
a,
b
Hand, J. L., Prenni, A. J., and Schichtel, B. A.: Trends in seasonal mean speciated aerosol composition in remote areas of the United States from 2000 through 2021, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD039902,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039902, 2024.
a,
b
Hayman, M. and Spuler, S.: Demonstration of a diode-laser-based high spectral resolution lidar (HSRL) for quantitative profiling of clouds and aerosols, Opt. Express, 25, A1096–A1110,
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.0A1096, 2017.
a
Hayman, M., Stillwell, R. A., Karboski, A., Marais, W. J., and Spuler, S. M.: Global estimation of range resolved thermodynamic profiles from micropulse differential absorption lidar, Opt. Express, 32, 14442–14460,
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.521178, 2024.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Hennemuth, B. and Lammert, A.: Determination of the atmospheric boundary layer height from radiosonde and lidar backscatter, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 120, 181–200,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9035-3, 2006.
a
Hoffman, K. and Demoz, B.: Convection Parameters from Remote Sensing Observations over the Southern Great Plains, Sensors, 25, 4163,
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25134163, 2025.
a
Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2318–2341,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1, 2006.
a
Kaimal, J. C., Wyngaard, J. C., Haugen, D. A., Coté, O. R., Izumi, Y., Caughey, S. J., and Readings, C. J.: Turbulence structure in the convective boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 2152–2169,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<2152:TSITCB>2.0.CO;2, 1976.
a
Kalmus, P., Ao, C. O., Wang, K.-N., Manzi, M. P., and Teixeira, J.: A high-resolution planetary boundary layer height seasonal climatology from GNSS radio occultations, Remote Sens. Environ., 276, 113037,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113037, 2022.
a
Kotthaus, S., Haeffelin, M., Drouin, M.-A., Dupont, J.-C., Grimmond, S., Haefele, A., Hervo, M., Poltera, Y., and Wiegner, M.: Tailored algorithms for the detection of the atmospheric boundary layer height from common automatic lidars and ceilometers (ALC), Remote Sens., 12, 3259,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12193259, 2020.
a
Kotthaus, S., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Collaud Coen, M., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Costa, M. J., Cimini, D., O'Connor, E. J., Hervo, M., Alados-Arboledas, L., Jiménez-Portaz, M., Mona, L., Ruffieux, D., Illingworth, A., and Haeffelin, M.: Atmospheric boundary layer height from ground-based remote sensing: a review of capabilities and limitations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 433–479,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-433-2023, 2023.
a
Krishnamurthy, R., Newsom, R. K., Berg, L. K., Xiao, H., Ma, P.-L., and Turner, D. D.: On the estimation of boundary layer heights: a machine learning approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4403–4424,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4403-2021, 2021.
a,
b
LeMone, M. A., Tewari, M., Chen, F., and Dudhia, J.: Objectively determined fair-weather CBL depths in the ARW-WRF model and their comparison to CASES-97 observations, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 30–54,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00106.1, 2013.
a,
b
Lenschow, D. H., Wyngaard, J. C., and Pennell, W. T.: Mean-field and second-moment budgets in a baroclinic, convective boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 1313–1326,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<1313:MFASMB>2.0.CO;2, 1980.
a
Lenschow, D. H., Wulfmeyer, V., and Senff, C.: Measuring second- through fourth-order moments in noisy data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 17, 1330–1347,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1330:MSTFOM>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
a,
b
Lewis, J. R., Welton, E. J., Molod, A. M., and Joseph, E.: Improved boundary layer depth retrievals from MPLNET, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 9870–9879,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50570, 2013.
a
Liu, Z., Chang, J., Li, H., Chen, S., and Dai, T.: Estimating boundary layer height from LiDAR data under complex atmospheric conditions using machine learning, Remote Sens., 14, 418,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14020418, 2022.
a,
b
Lothon, M., Lohou, F., Pino, D., Couvreux, F., Pardyjak, E. R., Reuder, J., Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., Durand, P., Hartogensis, O., Legain, D., Augustin, P., Gioli, B., Lenschow, D. H., Faloona, I., Yagüe, C., Alexander, D. C., Angevine, W. M., Bargain, E., Barrié, J., Bazile, E., Bezombes, Y., Blay-Carreras, E., van de Boer, A., Boichard, J. L., Bourdon, A., Butet, A., Campistron, B., de Coster, O., Cuxart, J., Dabas, A., Darbieu, C., Deboudt, K., Delbarre, H., Derrien, S., Flament, P., Fourmentin, M., Garai, A., Gibert, F., Graf, A., Groebner, J., Guichard, F., Jiménez, M. A., Jonassen, M., van den Kroonenberg, A., Magliulo, V., Martin, S., Martinez, D., Mastrorillo, L., Moene, A. F., Molinos, F., Moulin, E., Pietersen, H. P., Piguet, B., Pique, E., Román-Cascón, C., Rufin-Soler, C., Saïd, F., Sastre-Marugán, M., Seity, Y., Steeneveld, G. J., Toscano, P., Traullé, O., Tzanos, D., Wacker, S., Wildmann, N., and Zaldei, A.: The BLLAST field experiment: Boundary-Layer Late Afternoon and Sunset Turbulence, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10931–10960,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10931-2014, 2014.
a
McGrath-Spangler, E. L. and Denning, A. S.: Estimates of North American summertime planetary boundary layer depths derived from space-borne lidar, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D15101,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017615, 2012.
a
Molero, F., Barragán, R., and Artiñano, B.: Estimation of the atmospheric boundary layer height by means of machine learning techniques using ground-level meteorological data, Atmos. Res., 279, 106401,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106401, 2022.
a
NHC: Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Hilary (EP092023), Tech. rep., National Hurricane Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP092023_Hilary.pdf (last access: 1 April 2025), 2023. a
Olson, J. B., Kenyon, J. S., Angevine, W. A., Brown, J. M., Pagowski, M., and Sušelj, K.: A description of the MYNN-EDMF scheme and the coupling to other components in WRF–ARW, NOAA Technical Memorandum 61, Earth System Research Laboratory (U.S.), Global Systems Division,
https://doi.org/10.25923/n9wm-be49, 2019.
a
Pandis, S. N., Wexler, A. S., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Dynamics of tropospheric aerosols, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 9646–9659,
https://doi.org/10.1021/j100024a003, 1995.
a
Pearson, G., Davies, F., and Collier, C.: An analysis of the performance of the UFAM pulsed Doppler lidar for observing the boundary layer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 26, 240–250,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHA1128.1, 2009.
a
Peng, K., Xin, J., Zhu, X., Wang, X., Cao, X., Ma, Y., Ren, X., Zhao, D., Cao, J., and Wang, Z.: Machine learning model to accurately estimate the planetary boundary layer height of Beijing urban area with ERA5 data, Atmos. Res., 293, 106925,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106925, 2023.
a
Pleim, J. E.: A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: model description and testing, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 1383–1395,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2539.1, 2007.
a
Rieutord, T., Aubert, S., and Machado, T.: Deriving boundary layer height from aerosol lidar using machine learning: KABL and ADABL algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4335–4353,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4335-2021, 2021.
a,
b
Roldán-Henao, N., Su, T., and Li, Z.: Refining planetary boundary layer height retrievals from micropulse-lidar at multiple ARM sites around the world, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD040207,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040207, 2024.
a
Santanello, J. A., Dirmeyer, P. A., Ferguson, C. R., Findell, K. L., Tawfik, A. B., Berg, A., Ek, M., Gentine, P., Guillod, B. P., van Heerwaarden, C., Roundy, J., and Wulfmeyer, V.: Land–atmosphere interactions: the LoCo perspective, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 1253–1272,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0001.1, 2018.
a
Sawyer, V. and Li, Z.: Detection, variations and intercomparison of the planetary boundary layer depth from radiosonde, lidar and infrared spectrometer, Atmos. Environ., 79, 518–528,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.019, 2013.
a
Schween, J. H., Hirsikko, A., Löhnert, U., and Crewell, S.: Mixing-layer height retrieval with ceilometer and Doppler lidar: from case studies to long-term assessment, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3685–3704,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3685-2014, 2014.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Seibert, P., Beyrich, F., Gryning, S.-E., Joffre, S., Rasmussen, A., and Tercier, P.: Review and intercomparison of operational methods for the determination of the mixing height, Atmos. Environ., 34, 1001–1027,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00349-0, 2000.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Seidel, D. J., Ao, C. O., and Li, K.: Estimating climatological planetary boundary layer heights from radiosonde observations: Comparison of methods and uncertainty analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013680, 2010.
a
Seidel, D. J., Zhang, Y., Beljaars, A., Golaz, J.-C., Jacobson, A. R., and Medeiros, B.: Climatology of the planetary boundary layer over the continental United States and Europe, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018143, 2012.
a,
b,
c
Spuler, S. M., Repasky, K. S., Morley, B., Moen, D., Hayman, M., and Nehrir, A. R.: Field-deployable diode-laser-based differential absorption lidar (DIAL) for profiling water vapor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1073–1087,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1073-2015, 2015.
a
Spuler, S. M., Hayman, M., Stillwell, R. A., Carnes, J., Bernatsky, T., and Repasky, K. S.: MicroPulse DIAL (MPD) – a diode-laser-based lidar architecture for quantitative atmospheric profiling, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4593–4616,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4593-2021, 2021.
a
Stapleton, A., Dias-Junior, C. Q., Von Randow, C., Farias D'Oliveira, F. A., Pöhlker, C., de Araújo, A. C., Roantree, M., and Eichelmann, E.: Intercomparison of machine learning models to determine the planetary boundary layer height over central Amazonia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042488,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042488, 2025.
a
Stillwell, R. A., Spuler, S. M., Hayman, M., Repasky, K. S., and Bunn, C. E.: Demonstration of a combined differential absorption and high spectral resolution lidar for profiling atmospheric temperature, Opt. Express, 28, 71–93,
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.379804, 2020.
a,
b
Stillwell, R. A., Karboski, A., Hayman, M., and Spuler, S. M.: Expanding observational capabilities of diode-laser-based lidar through shot-to-shot modification of laser pulse characteristics, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4119–4130,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4119-2025, 2025.
a
Stull, R. B.: An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, Atmospheric Sciences Library, Springer, Dordrecht, ISBN 978-90-277-2769-5,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8, 1988.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Su, T. and Zhang, Y.: Deep-learning-derived planetary boundary layer height from conventional meteorological measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6477–6493,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6477-2024, 2024.
a
Su, T., Li, Z., and Kahn, R.: Relationships between the planetary boundary layer height and surface pollutants derived from lidar observations over China: regional pattern and influencing factors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15921–15935,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15921-2018, 2018.
a
Su, T., Li, Z., and Kahn, R.: A new method to retrieve the diurnal variability of planetary boundary layer height from lidar under different thermodynamic stability conditions, Remote Sens. Environ., 237, 111519,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111519, 2020.
a
Sullivan, P. P., Moeng, C.-H., Stevens, B., Lenschow, D. H., and Mayor, S. D.: Structure of the entrainment zone capping the convective atmospheric boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 3042–3064,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<3042:SOTEZC>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
a
Summa, D., Di Girolamo, P., Stelitano, D., and Cacciani, M.: Characterization of the planetary boundary layer height and structure by Raman lidar: comparison of different approaches, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3515–3525,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3515-2013, 2013.
a
Tang, G., Zhang, J., Zhu, X., Song, T., Münkel, C., Hu, B., Schäfer, K., Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Wang, L., Xin, J., Suppan, P., and Wang, Y.: Mixing layer height and its implications for air pollution over Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2459–2475,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2459-2016, 2016.
a
Tangborn, A., Demoz, B., Carroll, B. J., Santanello, J., and Anderson, J. L.: Assimilation of lidar planetary boundary layer height observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1099–1110,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1099-2021, 2021.
a
Teixeira, J., Piepmeier, J. R., Nehrir, A. R., Ao, C. O., Chen, S. S., Clayson, C. A., Fridlind, A. M., Lebsock, M., McCarty, W., Salmun, H., Santanello, J. A., Turner, D. D., Wang, Z., and Zeng, X.: Toward a global planetary boundary layer observing system: the NASA PBL Incubation Study Team Report, NASA, Washington, DC, USA,
https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/NASA_PBL_Incubation_Final_Report_2.pdf (last access: 1 April 2025), 2021. a
Troen, I. B. and Mahrt, L.: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 37, 129–148,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122760, 1986.
a
Träumner, K., Kottmeier, C., Corsmeier, U., and Wieser, A.: Convective boundary-layer entrainment: short review and progress using Doppler lidar, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 141, 369–391,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9657-6, 2011.
a,
b
Tsikoudi, I., Marinou, E., Vakkari, V., Gialitaki, A., Tsichla, M., Amiridis, V., Komppula, M., Raptis, I. P., Kampouri, A., Daskalopoulou, V., Mihalopoulos, N., Giannakaki, E., Tombrou, M., and Flocas, H.: PBL height retrievals at a coastal site using multi-instrument profiling methods, Remote Sens., 14, 4057,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14164057, 2022.
a
Tucker, S. C., Senff, C. J., Weickmann, A. M., Brewer, W. A., Banta, R. M., Sandberg, S. P., Law, D. C., and Hardesty, R. M.: Doppler lidar estimation of mixing height using turbulence, shear, and aerosol profiles, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 26, 673–688,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHA1157.1, 2009.
a,
b,
c
Vakkari, V., Manninen, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., Schween, J. H., van Zyl, P. G., and Marinou, E.: A novel post-processing algorithm for Halo Doppler lidars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 839–852,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-839-2019, 2019.
a
Wang, Z., Cao, X., Zhang, L., Notholt, J., Zhou, B., Liu, R., and Zhang, B.: Lidar measurement of planetary boundary layer height and comparison with microwave profiling radiometer observation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1965–1972,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1965-2012, 2012.
a
Wijnands, J. S., Apituley, A., Gouveia, D. A., and Noteboom, J. W.: Deep-Pathfinder: a boundary layer height detection algorithm based on image segmentation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3029–3045,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3029-2024, 2024.
a,
b
Wulfmeyer, V., Turner, D. D., Baker, B., Banta, R., Behrendt, A., Bonin, T., Brewer, W. A., Buban, M., Choukulkar, A., Dumas, E., Hardesty, R. M., Heus, T., Ingwersen, J., Lange, D., Lee, T. R., Metzendorf, S., Muppa, S. K., Meyers, T., Newsom, R., Osman, M., Raasch, S., Santanello, J., Senff, C., Späth, F., Wagner, T., and Weckwerth, T.: A new research approach for observing and characterizing land–atmosphere feedback, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 1639–1667,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0009.1, 2018.
a
Zhang, D., Comstock, J., Sivaraman, C., Mo, K., Krishnamurthy, R., Tian, J., Su, T., Li, Z., and Roldán-Henao, N.: Best estimate of the planetary boundary layer height from multiple remote sensing measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3453–3475,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3453-2025, 2025.
a,
b,
c
