Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-817-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-817-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
Research article
 | 
13 Feb 2025
Research article |  | 13 Feb 2025

Performance evaluation of Atmotube PRO sensors for air quality measurements in an urban location

Aishah I. Shittu, Kirsty J. Pringle, Stephen R. Arnold, Richard J. Pope, Ailish M. Graham, Carly Reddington, Richard Rigby, and James B. McQuaid

Viewed

Total article views: 1,424 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,080 275 69 1,424 28 36
  • HTML: 1,080
  • PDF: 275
  • XML: 69
  • Total: 1,424
  • BibTeX: 28
  • EndNote: 36
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,424 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,409 with geography defined and 15 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 30 Jun 2025
Download
Short summary
The study highlighted the performance of Atmotube PRO sensor particulate matter (PM) data. The result showed inter-sensor variability among the Atmotube PRO sensor data. This study showed 62.5 % of the sensors used for the study exhibited greater precision in their PM2.5 measurements. The overall performance showed that sensors passed the base testing using 1 h averaged data and that a multiple linear regression model using relative humidity values improved the performance of the PM2.5 data.
Read more
Share