Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-817-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-817-2025
Research article
 | 
13 Feb 2025
Research article |  | 13 Feb 2025

Performance evaluation of Atmotube PRO sensors for air quality measurements in an urban location

Aishah I. Shittu, Kirsty J. Pringle, Stephen R. Arnold, Richard J. Pope, Ailish M. Graham, Carly Reddington, Richard Rigby, and James B. McQuaid

Related authors

Decomposing pre-industrial to present-day land use change forcing in the UK Earth System Model
Emma Sands, Fiona M. O'Connor, James Weber, Ruth M. Doherty, and Richard J. Pope
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5638,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5638, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
GloPINE dataset: model-ready measurements of INP concentrations using PINE instruments
Ross James Herbert, Larissa Lacher, Alexander Böhmländer, Mark D. Tarn, Antione Canzi, Aidan Pantoya, Evelyn Freney, Kristina Höhler, Pia Bogert, Celine Planche, Ping Tian, Michael Adams, Sarah Barr, David Brus, Nicole Büttner, Martin Daily, Konstantinos Doulgeris, Konstantinos Eleftheridadis, Grant Forster, Romy Fösig, Dimitrios Georgakopoulos, Maria Gini, A. Gannett Hallar, Radovan Krejci, Elke Ludewig, Mauro Mazzola, Ian B. McCubbin, Tuukka Petäjä, Joseph Robinson, Franziska Vogel, Paul Zieger, Stephen R. Arnold, Kenneth S. Carslaw, Naruki Hiranuma, Ottmar Möhler, and Benjamin J. Murray
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-41,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-41, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Aerosol dry deposition fluxes on snow during the ALPACA campaign in Fairbanks, Alaska
Antonio Donateo, Gianluca Pappaccogli, Federico Scoto, Maurizio Busetto, Francesca L. Lovisco, Natalie Brett, Douglas Keller, Brice Barret, Elsa Dieudonné, Roman Pohorsky, Andrea Baccarini, Slimane Bekki, Jean-Christophe Raut, Julia Schmale, Kathy S. Law, Steve R. Arnold, Javier G. Fochesatto, William R. Simpson, and Stefano Decesari
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 18129–18156, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-18129-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-18129-2025, 2025
Short summary
Long-term satellite trends of European lower-tropospheric ozone from 1996–2017
Matilda A. Pimlott, Richard J. Pope, Brian J. Kerridge, Richard Siddans, Barry G. Latter, Wuhu Feng, and Martyn P. Chipperfield
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 15991–16007, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15991-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15991-2025, 2025
Short summary
Global optimal estimation retrievals of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide over water from IASI measurement spectra for 2018
Michael P. Cartwright, Jeremy J. Harrison, David P. Moore, Richard J. Pope, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Chris Wilson, and Wuhu Feng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 15913–15934, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15913-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15913-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Alfano, B., Barretta, L., Del Giudice, A., De Vito, S., Di Francia, G., Esposito, E., Formisano, F., Massera, E., Miglietta, M. L., and Polichetti, T.: A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers' Perspectives, Sensors, 20, 6819, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236819, 2020. 
AQMD: Field Evaluation Atmotube Pro, Air Quality Sensor performance Evaluation Centre, https://www.aqmd.gov/aq-spec (last access: 30 January 2025), 2020. 
Atmotube: Atmotube Technical Specifications, https://atmotube.com/atmotube-support/atmotube-technical-specification (last access: 24 July 2023), 2023. 
Badura, M., Batog, P., Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, A., and Modzel, P.: Regression methods in the calibration of low-cost sensors for ambient particulate matter measurements, SN (Springer) Appl. Sci., 1, 622, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0630-1, 2019. 
Barkjohn, K. K., Gantt, B., and Clements, A. L.: Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4617–4637, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
The study highlighted the performance of Atmotube PRO sensor particulate matter (PM) data. The result showed inter-sensor variability among the Atmotube PRO sensor data. This study showed 62.5 % of the sensors used for the study exhibited greater precision in their PM2.5 measurements. The overall performance showed that sensors passed the base testing using 1 h averaged data and that a multiple linear regression model using relative humidity values improved the performance of the PM2.5 data.
Share