Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 19, issue 4
Articles | Volume 19, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1573-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1573-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 4
Research article
 | 
03 Mar 2026
Research article |  | 03 Mar 2026

Intercomparison of seven collocated ground-based infrared spectrometer radiance observations and retrieved thermodynamic profiles

David D. Turner, Bianca Adler, Laura Bianco, James M. Wilczak, Vincent Michaud-Belleau, and Luc Rochette

Viewed

Total article views: 713 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
484 180 49 713 25 30
  • HTML: 484
  • PDF: 180
  • XML: 49
  • Total: 713
  • BibTeX: 25
  • EndNote: 30
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Dec 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Dec 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 713 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 673 with geography defined and 40 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
It is critical that a network of ground-based instruments that measure temperature and humidity profiles be well calibrated, so that differences between any two profiles can be attributed to atmospheric differences and not instrument calibration issues. This study evaluated the relative accuracy of 7 ground-based infrared spectrometers and their ability to measure these profiles, and found that the profile bias was much smaller than the uncertainty in the retrieved profiles themselves.
Read more
Share