Articles | Volume 19, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-6171-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-6171-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Satellite-based global monitoring of urban-scale methane emissions
Huihui Long
Department of Earth & Environmental Science, Simon Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Maria Tsivlidou
Department of Earth & Environmental Science, Simon Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Hugo Ricketts
Department of Earth & Environmental Science, Simon Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Department of Earth & Environmental Science, Simon Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Related authors
No articles found.
Maria Tsivlidou, Jamie McQuilkin, Hugo Ricketts, Kieran Wood, Jonathan Helmore, David Lowry, and Grant Allen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1665, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1665, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We assess a drone-based method to measure methane emissions using controlled release experiments at two sites. Estimated emission rates showed very good agreement with known release rates, demonstrating good accuracy. This work supports the development of direct emission measurement methods, which are essential for tracking emissions, informing reduction strategies, and improving greenhouse gas reporting, for local sources such as waste management.
Magdalena Pühl, Anke Roiger, Alina Fiehn, Alan M. Gorchov Negron, Eric A. Kort, Stefan Schwietzke, Ignacio Pisso, Amy Foulds, James Lee, James L. France, Anna E. Jones, Dave Lowry, Rebecca E. Fisher, Langwen Huang, Jacob Shaw, Prudence Bateson, Stephen Andrews, Stuart Young, Pamela Dominutti, Tom Lachlan-Cope, Alexandra Weiss, and Grant Allen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1005–1024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1005-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1005-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In April–May 2019 we carried out an airborne field campaign in the southern North Sea with the aim of studying methane emissions of offshore gas installations. We determined methane emissions from elevated methane measured downstream of the sampled installations. We compare our measured methane emissions with estimated methane emissions from national and global annual inventories. As a result, we find inconsistencies of inventories and large discrepancies between measurements and inventories.
Maria Tsivlidou, Bastien Sauvage, Yasmine Bennouna, Romain Blot, Damien Boulanger, Hannah Clark, Eric Le Flochmoën, Philippe Nédélec, Valérie Thouret, Pawel Wolff, and Brice Barret
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14039–14063, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14039-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14039-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The tropics are a region where the ozone increase has been most apparent since 1980 and where observations are sparse. Using aircraft, satellite, and model data, we document the characteristics of tropospheric ozone and CO over the whole tropics for the last 2 decades. We explore the origin of the observed CO anomalies and investigate transport processes driving the tropical CO and O3 distribution. Our study highlights the importance of anthropogenic emissions, mostly over the northern tropics.
Jacob T. Shaw, Amy Foulds, Shona Wilde, Patrick Barker, Freya A. Squires, James Lee, Ruth Purvis, Ralph Burton, Ioana Colfescu, Stephen Mobbs, Samuel Cliff, Stéphane J.-B. Bauguitte, Stuart Young, Stefan Schwietzke, and Grant Allen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1491–1509, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1491-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1491-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Flaring is used by the oil and gas sector to dispose of unwanted natural gas or for safety. However, few studies have assessed the efficiency with which the gas is combusted. We sampled flaring emissions from offshore facilities in the North Sea. Average measured flaring efficiencies were ~ 98 % but with a skewed distribution, including many flares of lower efficiency. NOx and ethane emissions were also measured. Inefficient flaring practices could be a target for mitigating carbon emissions.
Amy Foulds, Grant Allen, Jacob T. Shaw, Prudence Bateson, Patrick A. Barker, Langwen Huang, Joseph R. Pitt, James D. Lee, Shona E. Wilde, Pamela Dominutti, Ruth M. Purvis, David Lowry, James L. France, Rebecca E. Fisher, Alina Fiehn, Magdalena Pühl, Stéphane J. B. Bauguitte, Stephen A. Conley, Mackenzie L. Smith, Tom Lachlan-Cope, Ignacio Pisso, and Stefan Schwietzke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4303–4322, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We measured CH4 emissions from 21 offshore oil and gas facilities in the Norwegian Sea in 2019. Measurements compared well with operator-reported emissions but were greatly underestimated when compared with a 2016 global fossil fuel inventory. This study demonstrates the need for up-to-date and accurate inventories for use in research and policy and the important benefits of best-practice reporting methods by operators. Airborne measurements are an effective tool to validate such inventories.
Hannah Clark, Yasmine Bennouna, Maria Tsivlidou, Pawel Wolff, Bastien Sauvage, Brice Barret, Eric Le Flochmoën, Romain Blot, Damien Boulanger, Jean-Marc Cousin, Philippe Nédélec, Andreas Petzold, and Valérie Thouret
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16237–16256, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16237-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16237-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We examined 27 years of IAGOS (In-service Aircraft for a Global Observing System) profiles at Frankfurt to see if there were unusual features during the spring of 2020 related to COVID-19 lockdowns in Europe. Increased ozone near the surface was partly linked to the reduction in emissions. Carbon monoxide decreased near the surface, but the impact of the lockdowns was offset by polluted air masses from elsewhere. There were small reductions in ozone and carbon monoxide in the free troposphere.
Mark F. Lunt, Alistair J. Manning, Grant Allen, Tim Arnold, Stéphane J.-B. Bauguitte, Hartmut Boesch, Anita L. Ganesan, Aoife Grant, Carole Helfter, Eiko Nemitz, Simon J. O'Doherty, Paul I. Palmer, Joseph R. Pitt, Chris Rennick, Daniel Say, Kieran M. Stanley, Ann R. Stavert, Dickon Young, and Matt Rigby
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16257–16276, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16257-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16257-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present an evaluation of the UK's methane emissions between 2013 and 2020 using a network of tall tower measurement sites. We find emissions that are consistent in both magnitude and trend with the UK's reported emissions, with a declining trend driven by a decrease in emissions from England. The impact of various components of the modelling set-up on these findings are explored through a number of sensitivity studies.
Cited articles
Allen, G., Hollingsworth, P., Kabbabe, K., Pitt, J. R., Mead, M. I., Illingworth, S., Roberts, G., Bourn, M., Shallcross, D. E., and Percival, C. J.: The development and trial of an unmanned aerial system for the measurement of methane flux from landfill and greenhouse gas emission hotspots, Waste Manage., 87, 883–892, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.024, 2019. a
Anderson, D. C., Lindsay, A., DeCarlo, P. F., and Wood, E. C.: Urban emissions of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and methane determined from ground-based measurements in Philadelphia, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 4532–4541, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00294, 2021. a
Balasus, N., Jacob, D. J., Lorente, A., Maasakkers, J. D., Parker, R. J., Boesch, H., Chen, Z., Kelp, M. M., Nesser, H., and Varon, D. J.: A blended TROPOMI+GOSAT satellite data product for atmospheric methane using machine learning to correct retrieval biases, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3787–3807, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3787-2023, 2023. a, b
Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., Lee, M., Turner, A. J., Schroeder, R., Worden, J. R., Weidner, R. J., McDonald, K. C., and Jacob, D. J.: CMS: Global 0.5-deg Wetland Methane Emissions and Uncertainty (WetCHARTs v1.3.3), ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA [data set], https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/2346, 2024. a, b
Buchwitz, M., Schneising, O., Reuter, M., Heymann, J., Krautwurst, S., Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Boesch, H., Parker, R. J., Somkuti, P., Detmers, R. G., Hasekamp, O. P., Aben, I., Butz, A., Frankenberg, C., and Turner, A. J.: Satellite-derived methane hotspot emission estimates using a fast data-driven method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5751–5774, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5751-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d, e
Butz, A., Guerlet, S., Hasekamp, O., Schepers, D., Galli, A., Aben, I., Frankenberg, C., Hartmann, J. M., Tran, H., Kuze, A., Keppel-Aleks, G., Toon, G., Wunch, D., Wennberg, P., Deutscher, N., Griffith, D., MacAtangay, R., Messerschmidt, J., Notholt, J., and Warneke, T.: Toward accurate CO2 and CH4 observations from GOSAT, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047888, 2011. a
City of Los Angeles: City Boundary Dataset, https://geohub.lacity.org/datasets/lahub::city-boundary/explore (last access: 12 February 2026), 2026. a
Cooper, J., Dubey, L., and Hawkes, A.: Methane detection and quantification in the upstream oil and gas sector: the role of satellites in emissions detection, reconciling and reporting, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2, 9–23, https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EA00046B, 2022. a
Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Pagani, F., Schiavina, M., Melchiorri, M., Pisoni, E., Graziosi, F., Muntean, M., Maes, J., Dijkstra, L., Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., and Coheur, P.: Insights into the spatial distribution of global, national, and subnational greenhouse gas emissions in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR v8.0), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2811–2830, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2811-2024, 2024. a
Defratyka, S. M., Paris, J.-D., Yver-Kwok, C., Fernandez, J. M., Korben, P., and Bousquet, P.: Mapping urban methane sources in Paris, France, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 8583–8591, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00859, 2021. a
Forster, P., Storelvmo, T., Armour, K., Collins, W., Dufresne, J.-L., Frame, D., Lunt, D. J., Mauritsen, T., Palmer, M. D., Watanabe, M., Wild, M., and Zhang, H.: The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks and Climate Sensitivity, in: Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 923–1054, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.009, 2021. a
Global Methane Pledge: Pledges, https://globalmethanepledge.ccacoalition.org/#pledges (last access: 22 September 2025), 2023. a
Greater London Authority: Night Time Observatory: GIS Boundaries, https://data.london.gov.uk/night-time-observatory/gis-boundaries/ (last access: 12 Feebruary 2026), 2026. a
Hasekamp, O., Lorente, A., Hu, H., Butz, A., aan de Brugh, J., Borsdorff, T., Mandal, S., and Landgraf, J.: Algorithm Theoretical Baseline Document for Sentinel-5 Precursor Methane Retrieval, SRON-S5P-LEV2-RP-001 CI-7430-ATBD, SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, version 2.8.0, released 13 November 2024, https://sentiwiki.copernicus.eu/__attachments/a_18257c1a758ef62541f6bfc930257277e58e5ab5c734ca901260a6725bbdeb1f/SRON-S5P-LEV2-RP-001%20-%20Sentinel-5P%20TROPOMI%20ATBD%20Methane%20retrieval%202024%20-%202.8.0.pdf (last access: 24 September 2026), 2024. a, b, c
He, L., Zeng, Z.-C., Pongetti, T. J., Wong, C., Liang, J., Gurney, K. R., Newman, S., Yadav, V., Verhulst, K., Miller, C. E., Duren, R., Frankenberg, C., Wennberg, P. O., Shia, R.-L., Yung, Y. L., and Sander, S. P.: Atmospheric methane emissions correlate with natural gas consumption from residential and commercial sectors in Los Angeles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8563–8571, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083400, 2019. a
Helfter, C., Tremper, A. H., Halios, C. H., Kotthaus, S., Bjorkegren, A., Grimmond, C. S. B., Barlow, J. F., and Nemitz, E.: Spatial and temporal variability of urban fluxes of methane, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide above London, UK, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10543–10557, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10543-2016, 2016. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6, 2023. a
Hu, H., Landgraf, J., Detmers, R., Borsdorff, T., Aan de Brugh, J., Aben, I., Butz, A., and Hasekamp, O.: Toward global mapping of methane with TROPOMI: First results and intersatellite comparison to GOSAT, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 3682–3689, https://doi.org/10.1002/2018gl077259, 2018. a
IPCC: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Tech. rep., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647, 2023. a, b
Jacob, D. J., Turner, A. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Sheng, J., Sun, K., Liu, X., Chance, K., Aben, I., McKeever, J., and Frankenberg, C.: Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14371–14396, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016, 2016. a, b, c
Liu, M., van der A, R., van Weele, M., Bryan, L., Eskes, H., Veefkind, P., Liu, Y., Lin, X., de Laat, J., and Ding, J.: Current potential of CH4 emission estimates using TROPOMI in the Middle East, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5261–5277, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5261-2024, 2024. a
Maasakkers, J. D., McDuffie, E. E., Sulprizio, M. P., Chen, C., Schultz, M., Brunelle, L., Thrush, R., Steller, J., Sherry, C., Jacob, D. J., Jeong, S., Irving, B., and Weitz, M.: A gridded inventory of annual 2012–2018 US anthropogenic methane emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 16276–16288, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05138, 2023. a, b
Maazallahi, H., Fernandez, J. M., Menoud, M., Zavala-Araiza, D., Weller, Z. D., Schwietzke, S., von Fischer, J. C., Denier van der Gon, H., and Röckmann, T.: Methane mapping, emission quantification, and attribution in two European cities: Utrecht (NL) and Hamburg (DE), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14717–14740, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14717-2020, 2020. a
McDuffie, E. E., Maasakkers, J. D., Sulprizio, M. P., Chen, C., Schultz, M., Brunelle, L., Thrush, R., Steller, J., Sherry, C., Jacob, D. J., Jeong, S., Irving, B., and Weitz, M.: Gridded EPA U.S. Anthropogenic Methane Greenhouse Gas Inventory (gridded GHGI) (Version v1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8367082, 2023. a
Nesser, H., Jacob, D. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Lorente, A., Chen, Z., Lu, X., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Sulprizio, M. P., Winter, M., Ma, S., Bloom, A. A., Worden, J. R., Stavins, R. N., and Randles, C. A.: High-resolution US methane emissions inferred from an inversion of 2019 TROPOMI satellite data: contributions from individual states, urban areas, and landfills, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5069–5091, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5069-2024, 2024. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
New York State GIS Program Office: Civil Boundaries, https://gis.ny.gov/civil-boundaries (last access: 12 February 2026), 2026. a
Pandey, S., Houweling, S., Lorente, A., Borsdorff, T., Tsivlidou, M., Bloom, A. A., Poulter, B., Zhang, Z., and Aben, I.: Using satellite data to identify the methane emission controls of South Sudan's wetlands, Biogeosciences, 18, 557–572, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-557-2021, 2021. a, b
Pitt, J. R., Allen, G., Bauguitte, S. J.-B., Gallagher, M. W., Lee, J. D., Drysdale, W., Nelson, B., Manning, A. J., and Palmer, P. I.: Assessing London CO2, CH4 and CO emissions using aircraft measurements and dispersion modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8931–8945, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8931-2019, 2019. a, b, c
Pitt, J. R., Lopez-Coto, I., Hajny, K. D., Tomlin, J., Kaeser, R., Jayarathne, T., Stirn, B. H., Floerchinger, C. R., Loughner, C. P., Gately, C. K., Hutyra, L. R., Gurney, K. R., Roest, G. S., Liang, J., Gourdji, S., Karion, A., Whetstone, J. R., and Shepson, P. B.: New York City greenhouse gas emissions estimated with inverse modeling of aircraft measurements, Elem. Sci. Anth., 10, 00082, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00082, 2022. a, b
Pitt, J. R., Lopez-Coto, I., Karion, A., Hajny, K. D., Tomlin, J., Kaeser, R., Jayarathne, T., Stirm, B. H., Floerchinger, C. R., Loughner, C. P., Commane, R., Gately, C. K., Hutyra, L. R., Gurney, K. R., Roest, G. S., Liang, J., Gourdji, S., Mueller, K. L., Whetstone, J. R., and Shepson, P. B.: Underestimation of thermogenic methane emissions in New York City, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 9147–9157, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c10307, 2024. a, b
Plant, G., Kort, E. A., Floerchinger, C., Gvakharia, A., Vimont, I., and Sweeney, C.: Large fugitive methane emissions from urban centers along the US East Coast, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8500–8507, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082635, 2019. a
Plant, G., Kort, E. A., Murray, L. T., Maasakkers, J. D., and Aben, I.: Evaluating urban methane emissions from space using TROPOMI methane and carbon monoxide observations, Remote Sens. Environ., 268, 112756, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112756, 2022. a, b, c, d
Prather, M. J., Holmes, C. D., and Hsu, J.: Reactive greenhouse gas scenarios: Systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of atmospheric chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09803, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051440, 2012. a
Saint-Vincent, P. M. and Pekney, N. J.: Beyond-the-meter: Unaccounted sources of methane emissions in the natural gas distribution sector, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 39–49, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04657, 2019. a
Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe, M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P., Covey, K., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Pison, I., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Saito, M., Santini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weiss, R., Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: Variability and quasi-decadal changes in the methane budget over the period 2000–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11135–11161, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017, 2017. a
Saunois, M., Martinez, A., Poulter, B., Zhang, Z., Raymond, P. A., Regnier, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Patra, P. K., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Dlugokencky, E. J., Lan, X., Allen, G. H., Bastviken, D., Beerling, D. J., Belikov, D. A., Blake, D. R., Castaldi, S., Crippa, M., Deemer, B. R., Dennison, F., Etiope, G., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Holgerson, M. A., Hopcroft, P. O., Hugelius, G., Ito, A., Jain, A. K., Janardanan, R., Johnson, M. S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Lauerwald, R., Li, T., Liu, X., McDonald, K. C., Melton, J. R., Mühle, J., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., Pan, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Rocher-Ros, G., Rosentreter, J. A., Sasakawa, M., Segers, A., Smith, S. J., Stanley, E. H., Thanwerdas, J., Tian, H., Tsuruta, A., Tubiello, F. N., Weber, T. S., van der Werf, G. R., Worthy, D. E. J., Xi, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.: Global Methane Budget 2000–2020, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1873–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1873-2025, 2025. a, b, c, d
Schafer, N. B., Peischl, J., Apel, E. C., Barletta, B., Blake, D. R., Dass, P., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G. S., Francoeur, C., Fried, A., Gilman, J. B., Gurney, K., Harkins, C., Hornbrook, R. S., Lan, X., Lamplugh, A., Li, M., Meinardi, S., Nowak, J. B., Pétron, G., Richter, D., Selby, M., Selimovic, V., Treadaway, V., Walega, J., Weibring, P., Womack, C., and Brown, S. S.: Trends in CH4 Emission Sources in the Los Angeles Basin from 2010 to 2023 Using Airborne Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59, 26006–26019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c09817, 2025. a
Schiferl, L. D., Hallward-Driemeier, A., Zhao, Y., Toledo-Crow, R., and Commane, R.: Missing wintertime methane emissions from New York City related to combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 15683–15700, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15683-2025, 2025. a
Schneising, O., Buchwitz, M., Hachmeister, J., Vanselow, S., Reuter, M., Buschmann, M., Bovensmann, H., and Burrows, J. P.: Advances in retrieving XCH4 and XCO from Sentinel-5 Precursor: improvements in the scientific TROPOMI/WFMD algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 669–694, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-669-2023, 2023. a
Shen, L., Jacob, D. J., Gautam, R., Omara, M., Scarpelli, T. R., Lorente, A., Zavala-Araiza, D., Lu, X., Chen, Z., and Lin, J.: National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations, Nat. Commun., 14, 4948, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6, 2023. a
Sicsik-Paré, A., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Pison, I., Broquet, G., Opler, A., Potier, E., Martinez, A., Schneising, O., Buchwitz, M., Maasakkers, J. D., Borsdorff, T., and Berchet, A.: Assessment of the differences in European CH4 emission estimates from three TROPOMI products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 10423–10454, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10423-2026, 2026. a
Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger, N., and Zanis, P.: Short-lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J., Maycock, T., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 817–922, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008, 2021. a
Tibrewal, K., Ciais, P., Saunois, M., Martinez, A., Lin, X., Thanwerdas, J., Deng, Z., Chevallier, F., Giron, C., Albergel, C., Tanaka, K., Patra, P., Tsuruta, A., Zheng, B., Belikov, D., Niwa, Y., Janardanan, R., Maksyutov, S., Segers, A., Tzompa-Sosa, Z. A., Bousquet, P., and Sciare, J.: Assessment of methane emissions from oil, gas and coal sectors across inventories and atmospheric inversions, Commun. Earth Environ., 5, 26, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01190-w, 2024. a, b
Tsagatakis, I., Richardson, J., Evangelides, C., Hows, S.-M., Hamilton, N., Richmond, B., Pearson, B., Passant, N., Pommier, M., Pizzolato, M., and Otto, A.: UK Spatial Emissions Methodology: A report of the National Atmospheric Emission Inventory 2022, Tech. rep., National Atmospheric Emission Inventory, https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/library/reports?report_id=1142 (last access: 24 September 2026), 2024. a, b
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025, Tech. rep., United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, revision August 2025, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025/ (last access: 24 September 2026), 2025. a
U.S. Census Bureau: TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2017, 2010 Nation, U.S., 2010 Census Urban Area National, U.S. Census Bureau data set, https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2017-2010-nation-u-s-2010-census-urban-area-national (last access: 24 September 2026), 2017. a
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Global Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emission Projections & Mitigation Potential: 2015–2050, Tech. Rep. EPA-430-R-19-010, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/documents/epa_non-co2_greenhouse_gases_rpt-epa430r19010.pdf (last access: 24 September 2026), 2019. a
Vanselow, S., Schneising, O., Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., Boesch, H., and Burrows, J. P.: Automated detection of regions with persistently enhanced methane concentrations using Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10441–10473, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10441-2024, 2024. a, b
Varon, D. J., Jacob, D. J., McKeever, J., Jervis, D., Durak, B. O. A., Xia, Y., and Huang, Y.: Quantifying methane point sources from fine-scale satellite observations of atmospheric methane plumes, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5673–5686, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5673-2018, 2018. a, b
Veefkind, J. P., Aben, I., McMullan, K., Förster, H., de Vries, J., Otter, G., Claas, J., Eskes, H. J., de Haan, J. F., Kleipool, Q., van Weele, M., Hasekamp, O., Hoogeveen, R., Landgraf, J., Snel, R., Tol, P., Ingmann, P., Voors, R., Kruizinga, B., Vink, R., Visser, H., and Levelt, P. F.: TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 70–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.027, 2012. a
Wang, X., Jacob, D. J., Nesser, H., Balasus, N., Estrada, L. A., Sulprizio, M. P., Cusworth, D. H., Scarpelli, T. R., Chen, Z., East, J. D., and Varon, D. J.: Quantifying urban and landfill methane emissions in the United States using TROPOMI satellite data, Sci. Adv., 12, eadz9308, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adz9308, 2026. a, b
Weller, Z. D., Hamburg, S. P., and von Fischer, J. C.: A national estimate of methane leakage from pipeline mains in natural gas local distribution systems, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 8958–8967, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00437, 2020. a
Whiting, E., Plant, G., Kort, E. A., Aben, I., Biener, K. J., Leguijt, G., and Maasakkers, J. D.: Space-based observation of global increase in urban methane emissions from 2019–2023, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 123, e2504211123, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2504211123, 2026. a
Xing, Z., Hugenholtz, C., Barchyn, T. E., and Vollrath, C.: Satellite observations indicate a declining trend of methane emissions from heavy oil production in Canada, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 12, 1334–1339, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00426, 2025. a
Yadav, V., Verhulst, K., Duren, R., Thorpe, A., Kim, J., Keeling, R., Weiss, R., Cusworth, D., Mountain, M., Miller, C., and Whetstone, J.: A declining trend of methane emissions in the Los Angeles basin from 2015 to 2020, Environ. Res. Lett., 18, 034004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb6a9, 2023. a, b, c
Zeng, Z.-C., Pongetti, T., Newman, S., Oda, T., Gurney, K., Palmer, P. I., Yung, Y. L., and Sander, S. P.: Decadal decrease in Los Angeles methane emissions is much smaller than bottom-up estimates, Nat. Commun., 14, 5353, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40964-w, 2023. a
Zhu, L., Jacob, D. J., Keutsch, F. N., Mickley, L. J., Scheffe, R., Strum, M., González Abad, G., Chance, K., Yang, K., Rappenglück, B., Millet, D. B., Baasandorj, M., Jaeglé, L., and Shah, V.: Formaldehyde (HCHO) as a hazardous air pollutant: Mapping surface air concentrations from satellite and inferring cancer risks in the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5650–5657, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01356, 2017. a, b
Short summary
Methane emissions from cities are difficult to quantify using direct measurements. Satellites like TROPOMI can help with this. This study develops new ways to calculate emissions from satellite data and tests new methods for London, New York and Los Angeles in recent years.
Methane emissions from cities are difficult to quantify using direct measurements. Satellites...