65 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Technical note: Greenhouse gas flux studies: an automated online system for gas emission measurements in aquatic environments N. Thanh Duc et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3417-2020
2. Reconstruction of high-frequency methane atmospheric concentration peaks from measurements using metal oxide low-cost sensors R. Rivera Martinez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2209-2023
3. Development and machine learning-based calibration of low-cost multiparametric stations for the measurement of CO2 and CH4 in air R. Biagi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29772
4. A Vehicular IoT-Based Methane Sensing System for Large-Scale Urban Environmental Monitoring N. Perrella et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26144491
5. Using gas-phase air quality sensors to disentangle potential sources in a Los Angeles neighborhood A. Collier-Oxandale et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117519
6. A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments B. Maag et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660
7. Characterizing methane and total non-methane hydrocarbon levels in Los Angeles communities with oil and gas facilities using air quality monitors K. Okorn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146194
8. Synthesis and characterization of Cobalt-doped ZnO microstructures for methane gas sensing J. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.024
9. Performance of artificial neural networks and linear models to quantify 4 trace gas species in an oil and gas production region with low-cost sensors J. Casey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.049
10. Characterization of a commercial lower-cost medium-precision non-dispersive infrared sensor for atmospheric CO2 monitoring in urban areas E. Arzoumanian et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2665-2019
11. Simulations of Graphene Nanoribbon Field Effect Transistor for the Detection of Propane and Butane Gases: A First Principles Study M. Rashid et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010098
12. CH4 Emissions on Smallholder Plantations in The Tropical Peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia . Sustiyah et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1421/1/012003
13. Development of a low-maintenance measurement approach to continuously estimate methane emissions: A case study S. Riddick et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.006
14. Years are not brothers: Two-year comparison of greenhouse gas fluxes in large shallow Lake Võrtsjärv, Estonia E. Rõõm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.011
15. Precision and Limits of Detection for Selected Commercially Available, Low-Cost Carbon Dioxide and Methane Gas Sensors W. Honeycutt et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143157
16. Understanding the ability of low-cost MOx sensors to quantify ambient VOCs A. Collier-Oxandale et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1441-2019
17. Determining methane mole fraction at a landfill site using the Figaro Taguchi gas sensor 2611-C00 and wind direction measurements A. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00138E
18. Quantifying Methane Emission Rates Using Downwind Measurements S. Riddick https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020057
19. Development and testing of an electrochemical methane sensor P. Sekhar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.12.100
20. Assessment of the applicability of a low-cost sensor–based methane monitoring system for continuous multi-channel sampling I. Nagahage et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09290-w
21. Potential of a low-cost gas sensor for atmospheric methane monitoring M. van den Bossche et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.092
22. Long-term reliability of the Figaro TGS 2600 solid-state methane sensor under low-Arctic conditions at Toolik Lake, Alaska W. Eugster et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2681-2020
23. Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration C. Buehler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-995-2021
24. Calibration and field deployment of low-cost sensor network to monitor underground pipeline leakage Y. Cho et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.131276
25. A Review of Gas Measurement Set-Ups Ł. Fuśnik et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072557
26. Addressing Low-Cost Methane Sensor Calibration Shortcomings with Machine Learning E. Kiplimo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111313
27. Technical note: Pondi – a low-cost logger for long-term monitoring of methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxide in aquatic and terrestrial systems M. Malerba et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-5051-2025
28. Towards determining spatial methane distribution on Arctic permafrost bluffs with an unmanned aerial system F. Oberle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0242-9
29. The River Runner: a low-cost sensor prototype for continuous dissolved greenhouse gas measurements M. Dalvai Ragnoli & G. Singer https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-13-41-2024
30. Quantifying non-steady state natural gas leakage from the pipelines using an innovative sensor network and model for subsurface emissions - InSENSE J. Lo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122810
31. Using metal oxide gas sensors to estimate the emission rates and locations of methane leaks in an industrial site: assessment with controlled methane releases R. Rivera-Martinez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4257-2024
32. Optical Gas Imaging (OGI) as a Moderator for Interdisciplinary Cooperation, Reduced Emissions and Increased Safety T. Log et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081454
33. Continuous methane concentration measurements at the Greenland ice sheet–atmosphere interface using a low-cost, low-power metal oxide sensor system C. Jørgensen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3319-2020
34. Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO2 measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor C. Martin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2383-2017
35. Hazardous Methane Emissions Can Remain Undetected Offshore: Implications for Safety-Critical Operations S. Riddick & M. Mbua https://doi.org/10.3390/safety12050132
36. Assessing a low-cost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments A. Collier-Oxandale et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3569-2018
37. Greenhouse Gas Sensors Fabricated with New Materials for Climatic Usage: A Review K. Santhanam & N. Ahamed https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering2030038
38. Technical note: Facilitating the use of low-cost methane (CH4) sensors in flux chambers – calibration, data processing, and an open-source make-it-yourself logger D. Bastviken et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3659-2020
39. A fast calibration algorithm for Non-Dispersive Infrared single channel carbon dioxide sensor based on deep learning K. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.08.003
40. Imbedding Pd Nanoparticles into Porous In2O3 Structure for Enhanced Low-Concentration Methane Sensing X. Zuo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031163
41. Excellent sensing platforms for identification of gaseous pollutants based on metal–organic frameworks: A review Y. Zhai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.149286
42. Characterizing the Effect of Simultaneous Enhancements of Reducing Gas Species on Figaro Taguchi Gas Sensor Resistance Response A. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c06397
43. Methane Sensor Characterization Using Colocated Ambient Comparisons and Simulated Emission Challenges W. Champion et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00110
44. A Portable Device for Methane Measurement Using a Low-Cost Semiconductor Sensor: Development, Calibration and Environmental Applications L. Furst et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227456
45. Design and Implementation of Low-Cost Smart Home System with Sensor Multiplexing S. Nagendram et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00602-y
46. Applicability of Semiconductor Methane Sensors for Measuring Methane Emission from the Surface of a Water Body A. Mershavka et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856023040097
47. Synthesis and study of the structure, magnetic, optical and methane gas sensing properties of cobalt doped zinc oxide microstructures Z. Aghagoli & M. Ardyanian https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-8701-4
48. Use of metal oxide semiconductor sensors to measure methane in aquatic ecosystems in the presence of cross‐interfering compounds A. Butturini & J. Fonollosa https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10515
49. Characterization of inexpensive metal oxide sensor performance for trace methane detection D. Furuta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5117-2022
50. Design, Build, and Initial Testing of a Portable Methane Measurement Platform S. Riddick et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25071954
51. The calibration and deployment of a low-cost methane sensor S. Riddick et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117440
52. Community-Based Health and Exposure Study around Urban Oil Developments in South Los Angeles B. Shamasunder et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010138
53. A cautionary report of calculating methane emissions using low-cost fence-line sensors S. Riddick et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00021
54. Characterising changes in the methane response of a semiconductor-based metal oxide sensor over time A. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00046G
55. Performance Assessment of the Earthview BluBird Continuous Emission Monitoring System for Oil and Gas Facility Emissions Monitoring J. Maslanik et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26185946
56. Characterising the methane gas and environmental response of the Figaro Taguchi Gas Sensor (TGS) 2611-E00 A. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3391-2023
57. Evaluating and optimising formic acid treatment against varroa mites on honey bees with MOx-sensors and a control loop D. Senger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100342
58. Apparatus to characterize gas sensor response under real-world conditions in the lab J. Kneer et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4878717
59. SCAN B. Maag et al. https://doi.org/10.1145/3090084
60. A Common Risk Classification Concept for Safety Related Gas Leaks and Fugitive Emissions? T. Log & W. Pedersen https://doi.org/10.3390/en12214063
61. Determination of endogenous methane formation by photoacoustic spectroscopy E. Tuboly et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7155/7/4/046004
62. MOF/MWCNT–Nanocomposite Manipulates High Selectivity to Gas via Different Adsorption Sites with Varying Electron Affinity: A Study in Methane Detection in Parts-per-Billion S. Homayoonnia et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.2c01796
63. Methane (CH4) Detection System Using The TGS2611 Sensor and MQ-4 Sensor M. Ainur Rahma et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2780/1/012034
64. Design and evaluation of a low-cost sensor node for near-background methane measurement D. Furuta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2103-2024
65. Development of a low-cost UAV-based system for CH4monitoring over oil fields S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1724199