136 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Model calculations of the effects of present and future emissions of air pollutants from shipping in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea J. Jonson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-783-2015
2. Airborne emission measurements of SO2 , NOx and particles from individual ships using a sniffer technique J. Beecken et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1957-2014
3. Particulate matter in marine diesel engines exhausts: Emissions and control strategies F. Di Natale & C. Carotenuto https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.011
4. Seasonal variability of trace elements in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in a coastal city of northern Poland – profile analysis and source identification P. Siudek https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00031K
5. Field test of available methods to measure remotely SOx and NOx emissions from ships J. Balzani Lööv et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2597-2014
6. Volatility of a Ship’s Emissions in the Baltic Sea Using Modelling and Measurements in Real-World Conditions O. Kangasniemi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071175
7. Determination of Total Sulfur Content in Fuels: A Comprehensive and Metrological Review Focusing on Compliance Assessment K. Reis Medeiros et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2023.2249564
8. Sources of air pollutants from a Tier 2 ocean-going container vessel: Main engine, auxiliary engine, and auxiliary boiler C. McCaffery et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118023
9. Quantification and physical analysis of nanoparticle emissions from a marine engine using different fuels and a laboratory wet scrubber L. Santos et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EM00054G
10. Remote Detection of Different Marine Fuels in Exhaust Plumes by Onboard Measurements in the Baltic Sea Using Single-Particle Mass Spectrometry E. Rosewig et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050849
11. The Impact of Shipping on Air Quality in the Port Cities of the Mediterranean Area: A Review D. Toscano https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071180
12. Quantifying Emerging Local Anthropogenic Emissions in the Arctic Region: The ACCESS Aircraft Campaign Experiment A. Roiger et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00169.1.2016.1.test
13. Using multi-site data to apportion PM-bound metal(loid)s: Impact of a manganese alloy plant in an urban area A. Hernández-Pellón & I. Fernández-Olmo https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.261
14. Real-world emissions and total output from fishing vessels in Taiwan P. Chien et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104981
15. Chemical characterization of combustion engine exhaust and assessment of helicopter deck operator occupational exposures on an offshore frigate class ship S. Eriksen Hammer et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2023.2180150
16. Influence of redox-active components and particle size on reactive oxygen species production and oxidative potential of marine aerosols around the Arabian Peninsula H. Tong et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00093A
17. Global impacts of recent IMO regulations on marine fuel oil refining processes and ship emissions T. Chu Van et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.001
18. A comprehensive study of particulate and gaseous emissions characterization from an ocean-going cargo vessel under different operating conditions J. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117286
19. Spatial distribution of source areas of PM2.5 by Concentration Weighted Trajectory (CWT) model applied in PM2.5 concentration and composition data K. Dimitriou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.021
20. On-board measurements of OC/EC ratio, mixing state, and light absorption of ship-emitted particles W. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166692
21. Characterization of Particle and Gaseous Emissions from Marine Diesel Engines with Different Fuels and Impact of After-Treatment Technology J. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10081110
22. Impact of fuel sulfur regulations on carbonaceous particle emission from a marine engine M. Bauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00838-4
23. Assessment of wood industrial pollutants based on emission coefficients in China J. Chu & A. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2019-0201
24. Die vielen Gesichter von Ruß: Charakterisierung verbrennungsmotorischer Ruß‐Nanopartikel R. Niessner https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201402812
25. Measurement report: Vanadium-containing ship exhaust particles detected in and above the marine boundary layer in the remote atmosphere M. Abou-Ghanem et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8263-2024
26. Emission factors of SO2, NOx and particles from ships in Neva Bay from ground-based and helicopter-borne measurements and AIS-based modeling J. Beecken et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5229-2015
27. A chemometric investigation of aromatic emission profiles from a marine engine in comparison with residential wood combustion and road traffic: Implications for source apportionment inside and outside sulphur emission control areas H. Czech et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.022
28. Analysing ship emissions under complex operating conditions: Insights from onboard measurement data A. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117280
29. Using the Multicomponent Aerosol FORmation Model (MAFOR) to Determine Improved VOC Emission Factors in Ship Plumes L. Fink et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12060432
30. Spatial and Seasonal Dynamics of Ship Emissions over the Yangtze River Delta and East China Sea and Their Potential Environmental Influence Q. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03965
31. Maritime and coastal observations of ambient PM2.5 and its elemental compositions in the Bohai Bay of China during spring and summer: Levels, spatial distribution and source apportionment X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106897
32. The Many Faces of Soot: Characterization of Soot Nanoparticles Produced by Engines R. Niessner https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201402812
33. Source identification of individual soot agglomerates in Arctic air by transmission electron microscopy S. Weinbruch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.033
34. Characteristics and temporal evolution of particulate emissions from a ship diesel engine L. Mueller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.115
35. City Scale Modeling of Ultrafine Particles in Urban Areas with Special Focus on Passenger Ferryboat Emission Impact M. Lauenburg et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10010003
36. Reduction in greenhouse gas and other emissions from ship engines: Current trends and future options P. Aakko-Saksa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2022.101055
37. Characterization of pollutant discharges from ships within 100 nautical miles of China's coastline and certain inland river ports, 2022 X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117876
38. Characteristics of marine shipping emissions at berth: profiles for particulate matter and volatile organic compounds Q. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9527-2018
39. Global distribution and warming effect of brown carbon from shipping emissions Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-025-00212-w
40. On-board measurements of particle emissions from marine engines using fuels with different sulphur content H. Winnes et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090214530877
41. Characterisation of ship diesel primary particulate matter at the molecular level by means of ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry coupled to laser desorption ionisation—comparison of feed fuel, filter extracts and direct particle measurements C. Rüger et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8408-1
42. The variation of PM2.5 from ship emission under low-sulfur regulation: A case study in the coastal suburbs of Kitakyushu, Japan X. Zhang & M. Aikawa https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159968
43. Review of Acellular Assays of Ambient Particulate Matter Oxidative Potential: Methods and Relationships with Composition, Sources, and Health Effects J. Bates et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03430
44. Development of exhaust emission factors for vessels: A review and meta-analysis of available data A. Grigoriadis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100142
45. Trace element and isotope deposition across the air–sea interface: progress and research needs A. Baker et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0190
46. Primary Particulate Matter Emitted from Heavy Fuel and Diesel Oil Combustion in a Typical Container Ship: Characteristics and Toxicity D. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04471
47. PM2.5 source profiles and relative heavy metal risk of ship emissions: Source samples from diverse ships, engines, and navigation processes J. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.038
48. Chemical composition and size distribution of particulate matters from marine diesel engines with different fuel oils S. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.080
49. Impacts of fuel quality on indoor environment onboard a ship: From policy to practice S. Langer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102352
50. Emissions and Atmospheric Dry and Wet Deposition of Trace Metals from Natural and Anthropogenic Sources in Mainland China S. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15040402
51. Intermediate Volatility Organic Compound Emissions from a Large Cargo Vessel Operated under Real-World Conditions C. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04418
52. High semi-volatile organic aerosol contributions associated with ammonium nitrate in the coastal urban environment C. Pelayo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2026.2673160
53. Correlations between physicochemical properties of emitted diesel particulate matter and its reactivity W. Mühlbauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.02.029
54. Real world emission characteristics of Chinese fleet and the current situation of underestimated ship emissions L. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138107
55. Real-World Emission Factors of Gaseous and Particulate Pollutants from Marine Fishing Boats and Their Total Emissions in China F. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04002
56. Selective characterization of petroporphyrins in shipping fuels and their corresponding emissions using electron-transfer matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry M. Sueur et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126283
57. Size-segregated characteristics of organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC) and organic matter in particulate matter (PM) emitted from different types of ships in China F. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1549-2020
58. Evaluating methods for marine fuel sulfur content using microsensor sniffing systems on ocean-going vessels S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173765
59. In vitro genotoxic and mutagenic potentials of combustion particles from marine fuels with different sulfur contents S. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109440
60. Spatial distribution of metallic heteroatoms in soot nanostructure mapped by aberration-corrected STEM-EELS H. Wiinikka et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.12.004
61. The impact of scrubber discharge on the water quality in estuaries and ports J. Teuchies et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00380-z
62. Analysis of Diffusion Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Particulate Matter in Ship Exhaust Plume in Arctic Environment Based on CFD Y. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15050580
63. In-depth characterization of exhaust particles performed on-board a modern cruise ship applying a scrubber N. Kuittinen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174052
64. Airborne, Vehicle-Derived Fe-Bearing Nanoparticles in the Urban Environment: A Review T. Gonet & B. Maher https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01505
65. Air quality in Canadian port cities after regulation of low-sulphur marine fuel in the North American Emissions Control Area A. Anastasopolos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147949
66. Physicochemical and optical properties of combustion-generated particles from a coal-fired power plant, automobiles, ship engines, and charcoal kilns H. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.035
67. Emission characterizations and environmental impacts of off-road vehicles H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-024-00213-1
68. Soot reactivity and regeneration mechanism of modern automobile engines and methods of reducing soot emission for diesel particulate filter: A review Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2026.108458
69. Comparison of the impact of ships to size-segregated particle concentrations in two harbour cities of northern Adriatic Sea E. Merico et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115175
70. Analysis of ship emission characteristics under real-world conditions in China C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106615
71. Impact of the 0.1% fuel sulfur content limit in SECA on particle and gaseous emissions from marine vessels M. Zetterdahl et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.022
72. Health risks and air quality by PM2.5 in the leeward area of the Asian continent in the preceding year of the MARPOL Treaty enforcement X. Zhang & M. Aikawa https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01514-5
73. Satellite-Based Estimates of Individual Ship NOx Emissions Z. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00237
74. Measurements of abatement of particles and exhaust gases in a marine gas scrubber E. Fridell & K. Salo https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090214543716
75. Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs M. Sofiev et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02774-9
76. Comparison of ionic and carbonaceous compositions of PM2.5 in 2009 and 2012 in Shanghai, China M. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.100
77. Shipping and Air Quality in Italian Port Cities: State-of-the-Art Analysis of Available Results of Estimated Impacts E. Merico et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050536
78. Real-world emission factors and inhalation health risks of PM-bound metals from workboats using ultra-low sulfur marine fuel P. Chien et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128453
79. The activity-based methodology to assess ship emissions - A review R. Nunes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.099
80. On-board measurements of particle and gaseous emissions from a large cargo vessel at different operating conditions T. Chu-Van et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.008
81. Internally mixed multicomponent soot: Impact of different salts on soot structure and thermo-chemical properties H. Bladt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.11.007
82. Measurement and Modeling of Ship-Related Ultrafine Particles and Secondary Organic Aerosols in a Mediterranean Port City M. Karl et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11090771
83. Emission of intermediate volatility organic compounds from a ship main engine burning heavy fuel oil H. Lou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.04.029
84. The effect of diesel fuel sulphur and vanadium on engine performance and emissions T. Chu-Van et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116437
85. Detection of ship emissions from distillate fuel operation via single-particle profiling of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons L. Anders et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00056G
86. Particle- and Gaseous Emissions from an LNG Powered Ship M. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02678
87. Transport-related airborne nanoparticles: Sources, different aerosol modes, and their toxicity I. Vouitsis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119698
88. Characterization of particles from a marine engine operating at low loads M. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.009
89. Seasonal variability of PM2.5 composition and sources in the Klang Valley urban-industrial environment N. Amil et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5357-2016
90. Soot reactivity analysis and implications on diesel filter regeneration M. Lapuerta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100833
91. Real-world emission characteristics of an ocean-going vessel through long sailing measurement L. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152276
92. Modeling of the Concentrations of Ultrafine Particles in the Plumes of Ships in the Vicinity of Major Harbors M. Karl et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030777
93. Comparative performance of a thermal denuder and a catalytic stripper in sampling laboratory and marine exhaust aerosols S. Amanatidis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1422236
94. Influence of vessel characteristics and atmospheric processes on the gas and particle phase of ship emission plumes: in situ measurements in the Mediterranean Sea and around the Arabian Peninsula S. Celik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4713-2020
95. Evolution of the V/Ni Ratio in Response to IMO Regulation-Induced Fuel Shifts and Scrubber Use M. Brezins et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c01199
96. Particle emissions characterization from a medium-speed marine diesel engine with two fuels at different sampling conditions L. Ntziachristos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.091
97. High PM2.5 Emission from Typical Old, Small Fishing Vessels in China L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00927
98. Impact of lowering fuel sulfur content on atmospheric emissions from shipping activities in a World Heritage Bay in Vietnam T. Huyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102507
99. Emission of nanoparticles from coal and diesel fired power plants on Svalbard: An electron microscopy study S. Weinbruch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119138
100. Measurement report: Characterization of uncertainties in fluxes and fuel sulfur content from ship emissions in the Baltic Sea J. Walden et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18175-2021
101. Characteristics of PM2.5 from ship emissions and their impacts on the ambient air: A case study in Yangshan Harbor, Shanghai I. Mamoudou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.261
102. Dynamic calculation of ship exhaust emissions based on real-time AIS data L. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102277
103. An overview of natural and anthropogenic sources of ultrafine airborne particles: analytical determination to assess the multielemental profiles P. Smichowski & D. Gómez https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2023.2166522
104. Integrating multi-source maritime information to estimate ship exhaust emissions under wind, wave and current conditions L. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.012
105. Comparative analysis of ship exhaust gas monitoring methods Y. CHENG et al. https://doi.org/10.65658/j.hndk.2026010901
106. Emission Monitoring Dispatching of Drones Under Vessel Speed Fluctuation P. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3189979
107. Estimated health impacts from maritime transport in the Mediterranean region and benefits from the use of cleaner fuels M. Viana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105670
108. Controlling emissions from an ocean-going container vessel with a wet scrubber system J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121323
109. Chemical characterisation of PM10 from ship emissions: a study on samples from hydrofoil exhaust stacks E. Chianese et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17035-y
110. Changes in the impacts of ship emissions on PM2.5 and its components in China under the staged fuel oil policies G. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9497-2025
111. Effective density and metals content of particle emissions generated by a diesel engine operating under different marine fuels A. Momenimovahed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105651
112. Aerosol emissions from a marine diesel engine running on different fuels and effects of exhaust gas cleaning measures S. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120526
113. Sudden decrease of airborne sulfates in summer at sites in western Japan prior to the enforcement of the MARPOL Treaty M. Kondo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119571
114. Methodological Development for Studying the Chemical Composition of Exhaust Particle Emissions: Application to a Passenger Vessel Operating on Marine Gas Oil R. Mahi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16020126
115. Physical Characteristics of Particle Emissions from a Medium Speed Ship Engine Fueled with Natural Gas and Low-Sulfur Liquid Fuels J. Alanen et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06460
116. Influence of marine vessel emissions on the atmospheric PM2.5 in Japan’s around the congested sea areas R. Nakatsubo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134744
117. Measurement report: Emission factors and organic aerosol source apportionment of shipping emissions in the coastal city of Toulon, France Q. Gunti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-2893-2026
118. Volatility of secondary organic aerosol and sulphate particles formed in ship engine emission O. Kangasniemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2025.100376
119. Emission factors for gaseous and particulate pollutants from offshore diesel engine vessels in China F. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6319-2016
120. Source apportionment of atmospheric PM10 oxidative potential: synthesis of 15 year-round urban datasets in France S. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11353-2021
121. Atmospheric pollution from ships and its impact on local air quality at a port site in Shanghai X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6315-2019
122. Aerosol emissions of a ship diesel engine operated with diesel fuel or heavy fuel oil T. Streibel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6724-z
123. Quantifying Emerging Local Anthropogenic Emissions in the Arctic Region: The ACCESS Aircraft Campaign Experiment A. Roiger et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00169.1
124. Considerations in analysing elemental carbon from marine engine exhaust using residual, distillate and biofuels P. Aakko-Saksa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.09.005
125. Molecular characterization of major oxidative potential active species in ambient PM2.5: Emissions from biomass burning and ship exhaust C. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125291
126. A comparison of particulate matter and gaseous emission factors from two large cargo vessels during manoeuvring conditions T. Chu-Van et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.10.001
127. Changes in CCN activity of ship exhaust particles induced by fuel sulfur content reduction and wet scrubbing L. Santos et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00081D
128. Impact of port emissions on EU-regulated and non-regulated air quality indicators: The case of Civitavecchia (Italy) G. Gobbi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134984
129. Comparing emissions of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and metals from marine fuels and scrubbers A. Lunde Hermansson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102912
130. Atmospheric fine particles in a typical coastal port of Yangtze River Delta Q. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.05.026
131. High-resolution spatial distribution of marine vessel emission and its significance in sustainable port air quality management: A case study of Port of Incheon Y. Kwon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111799
132. Review of morphological and chemical characteristics of particulates from compression ignition engines A. Agarwal & M. Krishnamoorthi https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874221114532
133. Real-world emission characteristics of VOCs from typical cargo ships and their potential contributions to secondary organic aerosol and O3 under low-sulfur fuel policies F. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8999-2024
134. Emission factors of particulate and gaseous compounds from a large cargo vessel operated under real-world conditions C. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.036
135. Evaluation of biodiesel on speciated PM2.5, organic compound, ultrafine particle and gaseous emissions from a low-speed EPA Tier II marine diesel engine coupled with DPF, DEP and SCR filter at various loads A. Yusuf et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121837
136. Effect of propylene glycol ether fuelling on the different physico-chemical properties of the emitted particulate matters: Implications of the soot reactivity N. Serhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.065