36 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Quantifying methane point sources from fine-scale satellite observations of atmospheric methane plumes D. Varon et al. 10.5194/amt-11-5673-2018
2. Geostationary Emission Explorer for Europe (G3E): mission concept and initial performance assessment A. Butz et al. 10.5194/amt-8-4719-2015
3. Comment F. Chevallier & F. Bréon 10.1080/01621459.2017.1419138
4. Sensitivity of remotely sensed trace gas concentrations to polarisation D. O'Brien et al. 10.5194/amt-8-4917-2015
5. Polarization sensitivity error analysis and measurement of a greenhouse gas monitoring instrument H. Luo et al. 10.1364/AO.57.010009
6. Atmospheric measurements of ratios between CO<sub>2</sub> and co-emitted species from traffic: a tunnel study in the Paris megacity L. Ammoura et al. 10.5194/acp-14-12871-2014
7. The potential of a constellation of low earth orbit satellite imagers to monitor worldwide fossil fuel CO2 emissions from large cities and point sources F. Lespinas et al. 10.1186/s13021-020-00153-4
8. Unraveling the spatial-temporal patterns of typhoon impacts on maize during the milk stage in Northeast China in 2020 Q. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.eja.2024.127169
9. A scanning strategy optimized for signal-to-noise ratio for the Geostationary Carbon Cycle Observatory (GeoCarb) instrument J. Nivitanont et al. 10.5194/amt-12-3317-2019
10. Arctic Mission Benefit Analysis: impact of sea ice thickness, freeboard, and snow depth products on sea ice forecast performance T. Kaminski et al. 10.5194/tc-12-2569-2018
11. Intelligent pointing increases the fraction of cloud-free CO2 and CH4 observations from space R. Nassar et al. 10.3389/frsen.2023.1233803
12. TCCON Philippines: First Measurement Results, Satellite Data and Model Comparisons in Southeast Asia V. Velazco et al. 10.3390/rs9121228
13. Assessing the capability of different satellite observing configurations to resolve the distribution of methane emissions at kilometer scales A. Turner et al. 10.5194/acp-18-8265-2018
14. Simulated retrievals for the remote sensing of CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, CO, and H<sub>2</sub>O from geostationary orbit X. Xi et al. 10.5194/amt-8-4817-2015
15. Quantifying CO2 Emissions From Individual Power Plants From Space R. Nassar et al. 10.1002/2017GL074702
16. Potential of a geostationary geoCARB mission to estimate surface emissions of CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and CO in a polluted urban environment: case study Shanghai D. O'Brien et al. 10.5194/amt-9-4633-2016
17. The potential of satellite spectro-imagery for monitoring CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from large cities G. Broquet et al. 10.5194/amt-11-681-2018
18. High‐Resolution Lagrangian Inverse Modeling of CO2 Emissions Over the Paris Region During the First 2020 Lockdown Period K. Nalini et al. 10.1029/2021JD036032
19. Reviews and syntheses: guiding the evolution of the observing system for the carbon cycle through quantitative network design T. Kaminski & P. Rayner 10.5194/bg-14-4755-2017
20. Constraints on methane emissions in North America from future geostationary remote-sensing measurements N. Bousserez et al. 10.5194/acp-16-6175-2016
21. Satellite sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence detects early response of winter wheat to heat stress in the Indian Indo‐Gangetic Plains L. Song et al. 10.1111/gcb.14302
22. Detection of fossil fuel emission trends in the presence of natural carbon cycle variability Y. Yin et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab2dd7
23. Diagnostic methods for atmospheric inversions of long-lived greenhouse gases A. Michalak et al. 10.5194/acp-17-7405-2017
24. S2MetNet: A novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for methane point source quantification using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery A. Radman et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113708
25. A multi-model approach to monitor emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> and CO from an urban–industrial complex I. Super et al. 10.5194/acp-17-13297-2017
26. Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions D. Jacob et al. 10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016
27. Towards accurate methane point-source quantification from high-resolution 2-D plume imagery S. Jongaramrungruang et al. 10.5194/amt-12-6667-2019
28. Warmer spring alleviated the impacts of 2018 European summer heatwave and drought on vegetation photosynthesis S. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108195
29. The Potential of the Geostationary Carbon Cycle Observatory (GeoCarb) to Provide Multi-scale Constraints on the Carbon Cycle in the Americas B. Moore III et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00109
30. Quantitative imaging of carbon dioxide plumes using a ground-based shortwave infrared spectral camera M. Knapp et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2257-2024
31. Source‐receptor relationships of column‐average CO2 and implications for the impact of observations on flux inversions J. Liu et al. 10.1002/2014JD022914
32. Exploring the utility of quantitative network design in evaluating Arctic sea ice thickness sampling strategies T. Kaminski et al. 10.5194/tc-9-1721-2015
33. Four years of global carbon cycle observed from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) version 9 and in situ data and comparison to OCO-2 version 7 H. Peiro et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1097-2022
34. Assimilation of atmospheric CO2 observations from space can support national CO2 emission inventories T. Kaminski et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac3cea
35. Detecting high-emitting methane sources in oil/gas fields using satellite observations D. Cusworth et al. 10.5194/acp-18-16885-2018
36. Atmospheric measurements of ratios between CO<sub>2</sub> and co-emitted species from traffic: a tunnel study in the Paris megacity L. Ammoura et al. 10.5194/acpd-14-20197-2014