194 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Multi-unit calibration rejects inherent device variability of chemical sensor arrays A. Solórzano et al.
2. Real-Time Environmental Monitoring Platform for Wellness and Preventive Care in a Smart and Sustainable City with an Urban Landscape Perspective: The Case of Developing Countries V. Gonzalez et al.
3. The impacts of water vapour and co-pollutants on the performance of electrochemical gas sensors used for air quality monitoring X. Pang et al.
4. IoT-based filter management system using reinforced ANFIS for VOCs reduction in urban industrial facilities K. Kim et al.
5. Field and laboratory performance evaluations of 28 gas-phase air quality sensors by the AQ-SPEC program A. Collier-Oxandale et al.
6. Confined space rescue: A proposed procedure to reduce the risks J. Selman et al.
7. Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer P. Monks et al.
8. Clustering approaches to improve the performance of low cost air pollution sensors K. Smith et al.
9. Calibration Model of a Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Using an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System K. Alhasa et al.
10. Miniature Low-Cost Carbon Dioxide Sensor for Mobile Devices L. Scholz et al.
11. An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations K. Okorn & L. Iraci
12. Intelligent Wireless Sensor Network for Gas Classification Using Machine Learning N. Zaeri & R. Qasim
13. Informed Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Methods for Mobile Sensor Network Calibration C. Dorffer et al.
14. Enrichment of Air Quality Monitoring with mobile Sensors for Spatial Modelling of Pollutants (case study: CO in Tehran) M. Kheradmandi & R. Abbaspour
15. Field calibration of a low-cost sensors network to assess traffic-related air pollution along the Brenner highway A. Bisignano et al.
16. A portable, low-cost, smartphone assisted methodology for on-site measurement of NO2 levels in ambient air by selective chemical reactivity and digital image analysis M. Cerrato-Alvarez et al.
17. Two step calibration method for ozone low-cost sensor: Field experiences with the UrbanSense DCUs J. Sá et al.
18. Reducing the Influence of Environmental Factors on Performance of a Diffusion-Based Personal Exposure Kit H. Zong et al.
19. Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance S. Jain & N. Zimmerman
20. Use of Uncertainty Calculation Software as a Didactic Tool to Improve the Knowledge of Chemistry Students in Analytical Method Validation M. Cerrato-Alvarez et al.
21. Monitoring Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) by Smart E-Nose: A Review Y. Wu et al.
22. Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors: Biases, Corrections and Challenges in Their Comparability I. Hayward et al.
23. Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM2.5 Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors A. Mukherjee et al.
24. Solution to the Problem of Calibration of Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement Sensors in Networks G. Miskell et al.
25. Handling non-stationarity in E-nose design: a review V. Pareek et al.
26. On the use of small and cheaper sensors and devices for indicative citizen-based monitoring of respirable particulate matter M. Jovašević-Stojanović et al.
27. High-Sensitivity NO2 Gas Sensor: Exploiting UV-Enhanced Recovery in a Hexadecafluorinated Iron Phthalocyanine-Reduced Graphene Oxide J. Cruz Lozada et al.
28. Metrology for low-cost CO2 sensors applications: the case of a steady-state through-flow (SS-TF) chamber for CO2 fluxes observations R. Curcoll et al.
29. Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al.
30. Low-Cost Air Quality Sensing towards Smart Homes H. Omidvarborna et al.
31. A Statistical Calibration Framework for Improving Non-Reference Method Particulate Matter Reporting: A Focus on Community Air Monitoring Settings S. Commodore et al.
32. AirQuality Lab-on-a-Drone: A Low-Cost 3D-Printed Analytical IoT Platform for Vertical Monitoring of Gaseous H2S V. Leal et al.
33. How Sensors Might Help Define the External Exposome M. Loh et al.
34. Data Verification Tools for Minimizing Management Costs of Dense Air-Quality Monitoring Networks G. Miskell et al.
35. Developing a Low-Cost Wearable Personal Exposure Monitor for Studying Respiratory Diseases Using Metal–Oxide Sensors K. Mallires et al.
36. Calibrating Low-Cost Sensors by a Two-Phase Learning Approach for Urban Air Quality Measurement Y. Lin et al.
37. Developing the scientific framework for urban geochemistry L. Chambers et al.
38. A CO2optical sensor based on self-assembled metal–organic framework nanoparticles B. Chocarro-Ruiz et al.
39. Predicting airborne pollutant concentrations and events in a commercial building using low-cost pollutant sensors and machine learning: A case study A. Mohammadshirazi et al.
40. Intra-urban spatial variability of surface ozone in Riverside, CA: viability and validation of low-cost sensors K. Sadighi et al.
41. Characterizing the Aging of Alphasense NO2 Sensors in Long-Term Field Deployments J. Li et al.
42. Long-term field comparison of multiple low-cost particulate matter sensors in an outdoor urban environment F. Bulot et al.
43. Reputation-Based Reverse Combination Auction Incentive Method to Encourage Vehicles to Participate in the VCS System H. Yu et al.
44. Spatial temporal distribution of particulate matter emission in Purwokerto, Banyumas, Central Java I. Sani et al.
45. Seasonal Influence on the Performance of Low-Cost NO2 Sensor Calibrations S. Ratingen et al.
46. Transformational IoT sensing for air pollution and thermal exposures J. Pantelic et al.
47. Non-linear probabilistic calibration of low-cost environmental air pollution sensor networks for neighborhood level spatiotemporal exposure assessment A. Patton et al.
48. A Systematic Review of Air Quality Sensors, Guidelines, and Measurement Studies for Indoor Air Quality Management H. Zhang & R. Srinivasan
49. End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? J. Robinson et al.
50. Efficacy of Paired Electrochemical Sensors for Measuring Ozone Concentrations C. Zuidema et al.
51. Validation of Low-Cost Sensors in Measuring Real-Time PM10 Concentrations at Two Sites in Delhi National Capital Region R. Sahu et al.
52. Investigating transport of particulate matter from cooking emissions in a multi-story house using low-cost sensor measurements and different modeling approaches A. Martin et al.
53. Towards Improving Air Quality Monitoring Using Fixed and Mobile Stations: Case of Mohammedia City A. El Arfaoui et al.
54. The influence of humidity on the performance of a low-cost air particle mass sensor and the effect of atmospheric fog R. Jayaratne et al.
55. A fast calibration algorithm for Non-Dispersive Infrared single channel carbon dioxide sensor based on deep learning K. Mao et al.
56. A hardware–software co-design calibration framework for two-electrode gas sensors under low-temperature conditions: accuracy, latency, and energy trade-offs Y. Chen et al.
57. Characterization of PM 2.5 exposure concentration in transport microenvironments using portable monitors Z. Li et al.
58. Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor K. Kelly et al.
59. The effect of ego-motion on environmental monitoring U. Lerner et al.
60. Design of an ozone and nitrogen dioxide sensor unit and its long-term operation within a sensor network in the city of Zurich M. Mueller et al.
61. Rational Design of Semiconductor‐Based Chemiresistors and their Libraries for Next‐Generation Artificial Olfaction S. Jeong et al.
62. Data-Driven Techniques for Low-Cost Sensor Selection and Calibration for the Use Case of Air Quality Monitoring R. Kureshi et al.
63. Mapping Occupational Hazards with a Multi-sensor Network in a Heavy-Vehicle Manufacturing Facility C. Zuidema et al.
64. SmartAirQ: A Big Data Governance Framework for Urban Air Quality Management in Smart Cities A. Kaginalkar et al.
65. Prototype design of urban monitoring on several gaseous pollutants using low-cost electrochemical sensors K. Alhasa et al.
66. Calibration and assessment of electrochemical air quality sensors by co-location with regulatory-grade instruments D. Hagan et al.
67. Assessing the Utility of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors over a 12-Week Period in the Cuyama Valley of California A. Mukherjee et al.
68. Kitchen Area Air Quality Measurements in Northern Ghana: Evaluating the Performance of a Low-Cost Particulate Sensor within a Household Energy Study E. Coffey et al.
69. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/carbon-based nanocomposite for gas sensing I. Olenych et al.
70. Low-complexity methods to mitigate the impact of environmental variables on low-cost UAS-based atmospheric carbon dioxide measurements G. Britto Hupsel de Azevedo et al.
71. A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring N. Zimmerman et al.
72. Low Cost Sensor With IoT LoRaWAN Connectivity and Machine Learning-Based Calibration for Air Pollution Monitoring S. Ali et al.
73. Validate personal air-pollution sensors A. Lewis & P. Edwards
74. Optimization of a Low-Power Chemoresistive Gas Sensor: Predictive Thermal Modelling and Mechanical Failure Analysis A. Gaiardo et al.
75. Practical Use of Metal Oxide Semiconductor Gas Sensors for Measuring Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone in Urban Environments P. Peterson et al.
76. Design, fabrication, and calibration of the Building EnVironment and Occupancy (BEVO) Beacon: A rapidly-deployable and affordable indoor environmental quality monitor H. Fritz et al.
77. Low-cost, multimodal environmental monitoring based on the Internet of Things G. Coulby et al.
78. Calibration and Inter-Unit Consistency Assessment of an Electrochemical Sensor System Using Machine Learning I. Apostolopoulos et al.
79. Development and Application of a Next Generation Air Sensor Network for the Hong Kong Marathon 2015 Air Quality Monitoring L. Sun et al.
80. Mapping urban air quality in near real-time using observations from low-cost sensors and model information P. Schneider et al.
81. Air pollution and pregnancy J. Aguilera et al.
82. Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al.
83. CO2 gas sensing with an electrolyte-gated transistor using impedance spectroscopy B. Ersöz et al.
84. Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors T. Sayahi et al.
85. Understanding the ability of low-cost MOx sensors to quantify ambient VOCs A. Collier-Oxandale et al.
86. Smartphone App for Residential Testing of Formaldehyde (SmART-Form) S. Zhang et al.
87. Evaluating and improving the reliability of gas-phase sensor system calibrations across new locations for ambient measurements and personal exposure monitoring S. Vikram et al.
88. Calibration and performance evaluation of PM2.5 and NO2 air quality sensors for environmental epidemiology M. Chacón-Mateos et al.
89. Evaluating the performance of low cost chemical sensors for air pollution research A. Lewis et al.
90. The Smart Ring Experience in l’Aquila (Italy): Integrating Smart Mobility Public Services with Air Quality Indexes M. Villani et al.
91. Rapid and Selective Detection of Linalool Using Solidly Mounted Resonators for Plant Health Monitoring U. Yaqoob et al.
92. Air Pollution Monitoring via Wireless Sensor Networks: The Investigation and Correction of the Aging Behavior of Electrochemical Gaseous Pollutant Sensors I. Christakis et al.
93. Using A Low-Cost Sensor Array and Machine Learning Techniques to Detect Complex Pollutant Mixtures and Identify Likely Sources J. Thorson et al.
94. Deployment, Calibration, and Cross-Validation of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors for Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Ozone for an Epidemiological Study C. Zuidema et al.
95. A Novel Network‐Based Approach to Determining Measurement Representation Error for Model Evaluation of Aerosol Microphysical Properties E. Asher et al.
96. Multivariate estimation of the limit of detection by orthogonal partial least squares in temperature-modulated MOX sensors J. Burgués & S. Marco
97. Conducting Human-Centered Building Science at the Well Living Lab S. Aristizabal et al.
98. Assessing Mobility-Based Real-Time Air Pollution Exposure in Space and Time Using Smart Sensors and GPS Trajectories in Beijing J. Ma et al.
99. Using low-cost particle sensors in HVAC ducts V. Gentile et al.
100. Wearable system for outdoor air quality monitoring in a WSN with cloud computing: Design, validation and deployment S. Palomeque-Mangut et al.
101. Observational Inferences of NOx and CO Emission Factors for Vehicles and Homes in the San Francisco Bay Area Y. Zhu et al.
102. Investigating the intra-urban thermal and air quality environment: New transect sensing methodology and measurements I. Kousis et al.
103. Field calibration of electrochemical NO2 sensors in a citizen science context B. Mijling et al.
104. Domain Adaptation-Based Deep Calibration of Low-Cost PM₂.₅ Sensors S. Jha et al.
105. Electronic Noses: From Advanced Materials to Sensors Aided with Data Processing W. Hu et al.
106. Long-term reliability of the Figaro TGS 2600 solid-state methane sensor under low-Arctic conditions at Toolik Lake, Alaska W. Eugster et al.
107. Application of Low-Cost Sensors for Accurate Ambient Temperature Monitoring B. Mobaraki et al.
108. Application of low-cost particulate matter sensors for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment in underground mines: A review N. Amoah et al.
109. An evaluation tool kit of air quality micro-sensing units B. Fishbain et al.
110. Spatial Modeling of Daily PM2.5, NO2, and CO Concentrations Measured by a Low-Cost Sensor Network: Comparison of Linear, Machine Learning, and Hybrid Land Use Models S. Jain et al.
111. Development and Evaluation of A Novel and Cost-Effective Approach for Low-Cost NO2 Sensor Drift Correction L. Sun et al.
112. Development of end-to-end low-cost IoT system for densely deployed PM monitoring network: an Indian case study A. Parmar et al.
113. Calibration of low-cost NO2 sensors in an urban air quality network V. van Zoest et al.
114. Performance of artificial neural networks and linear models to quantify 4 trace gas species in an oil and gas production region with low-cost sensors J. Casey et al.
115. Machine Learning for Improving Accuracy and Utility of Low-Cost Environmental Air Pollution Sensor Networks for Probabilistic Spatial Exposure Assessment A. Patton et al.
116. Effect of Relative Humidity and Air Temperature on the Results Obtained from Low-Cost Gas Sensors for Ambient Air Quality Measurements A. Samad et al.
117. Mapping trends and analyzing key themes in low-cost sensors for air quality monitoring K. Alhasa et al.
118. Transit pollution exposure monitoring using low-cost wearable sensors N. Motlagh et al.
119. Online decorrelation of humidity and temperature in chemical sensors for continuous monitoring R. Huerta et al.
120. COCAP: a carbon dioxide analyser for small unmanned aircraft systems M. Kunz et al.
121. Quantifying the dynamic characteristics of indoor air pollution using real-time sensors: Current status and future implication J. Wang et al.
122. A review of international experience in air quality assessment M. Pozdnyakov et al.
123. Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Tools: From Research to Practice (A Workshop Summary) A. Clements et al.
124. Testing the performance of field calibration techniques for low-cost gas sensors in new deployment locations: across a county line and across Colorado J. Casey & M. Hannigan
125. Evaluation of a low-cost multi-channel monitor for indoor air quality through a novel, low-cost, and reproducible platform A. Baldelli
126. Academically Produced Air Pollution Sensors for Personal Exposure Assessment: The Canarin Project B. Dessimond et al.
127. Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM2.5 and PM10 Sensors A. Cavaliere et al.
128. Improving Air Pollutant Metal Oxide Sensor Quantification Practices through: An Exploration of Sensor Signal Normalization, Multi-Sensor and Universal Calibration Model Generation, and Physical Factors Such as Co-Location Duration and Sensor Age K. Okorn & M. Hannigan
129. Using a network of lower-cost monitors to identify the influence of modifiable factors driving spatial patterns in fine particulate matter concentrations in an urban environment S. Rose Eilenberg et al.
130. People-Centric Cognitive Internet of Things for the Quantitative Analysis of Environmental Exposure L. Yang et al.
131. Understanding the origins of urban particulate matter pollution based on high-density vehicle-based sensor monitoring and big data analysis Y. Liang et al.
132. Solar-powered air quality monitor applied under subtropical conditions in Hong Kong: Performance evaluation and application for pollution source tracking P. Wei et al.
133. Review of urban computing in air quality management as smart city service: An integrated IoT, AI, and cloud technology perspective A. Kaginalkar et al.
134. Wireless Sensor Network Combined with Cloud Computing for Air Quality Monitoring P. Arroyo et al.
135. Evaluation of low-cost formaldehyde sensors calibration M. Justo Alonso et al.
136. W-Air B. Maag et al.
137. Applicability of compact and useful PM2.5 instrument with gas sensors in Japan and Thailand H. Aung et al.
138. Low-cost electronic sensors for environmental research: Pitfalls and opportunities K. Chan et al.
139. A small, lightweight multipollutant sensor system for ground-mobile and aerial emission sampling from open area sources X. Zhou et al.
140. Personalised and Sustainable IEQ Monitoring: Use of Multi-Modal and Pervasive Technologies G. Coulby et al.
141. Hyperlocal air pollution in an urban environment - measured with low-cost sensors L. Frederickson et al.
142. From Crowdsourcing to Extreme Citizen Science: Participatory Research for Environmental Health P. English et al.
143. New understanding of miniaturized VOCs monitoring device: PID-type sensors performance evaluations in ambient air W. Xu et al.
144. Characterizing methane and total non-methane hydrocarbon levels in Los Angeles communities with oil and gas facilities using air quality monitors K. Okorn et al.
145. Empiric Unsupervised Drifts Correction Method of Electrochemical Sensors for in Field Nitrogen Dioxide Monitoring R. Laref et al.
146. An Approximation for Metal-Oxide Sensor Calibration for Air Quality Monitoring Using Multivariable Statistical Analysis D. Sales-Lérida et al.
147. Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration C. Buehler et al.
148. Low-Cost Sensors Accuracy Study and Enhancement Strategy S. Komarizadehasl et al.
149. Orthorhombic MoO3 nanobelts based NO2 gas sensor A. Mane & A. Moholkar
150. Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone? L. Morawska et al.
151. Characterization of inexpensive metal oxide sensor performance for trace methane detection D. Furuta et al.
152. iLOCuS: Incentivizing Vehicle Mobility to Optimize Sensing Distribution in Crowd Sensing S. Xu et al.
153. Assessing a low-cost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments A. Collier-Oxandale et al.
154. Assessing personal travel exposure to on-road PM2.5 using cellphone positioning data and mobile sensors Q. Li et al.
155. Review of low-cost sensors for indoor air quality: Features and applications M. Ródenas García et al.
156. A Deep Calibration Method for Low-Cost Air Monitoring Sensors With Multilevel Sequence Modeling H. Yu et al.
157. Mobile sensor network noise reduction and recalibration using a Bayesian network Y. Xiang et al.
158. Low-cost measurement techniques to characterize the influence of home heating fuel on carbon monoxide in Navajo homes J. Casey et al.
159. Applications and Limitations of Quantifying Speciated and Source-Apportioned VOCs with Metal Oxide Sensors K. Okorn & M. Hannigan
160. Informing decisions in agent-based models — A mobile update A. Bell
161. Fine particle mass monitoring with low-cost sensors: Corrections and long-term performance evaluation C. Malings et al.
162. Wearable sensors for respiratory protection in occupational settings J. Devkota & H. Sharma
163. Accuracy and practicality of a portable ozone monitor for personal exposure estimates J. Sagona et al.
164. One-year spatiotemporal variations of air pollutants in a major chemical-industry park in the Yangtze River Delta, China by 30 miniature air quality monitoring stations X. Pang et al.
165. Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO2 measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor C. Martin et al.
166. Environmental chemical sensing using small drones: A review J. Burgués & S. Marco
167. Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration F. Concas et al.
168. Using spatiotemporal prediction models to quantify PM2.5 exposure due to daily movement S. Jain et al.
169. Field comparison of electrochemical gas sensor data correction algorithms for ambient air measurements Y. Liang et al.
170. The BErkeley Atmospheric CO2 Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors J. Kim et al.
171. Towards the Development of a Sensor Educational Toolkit to Support Community and Citizen Science A. Collier-Oxandale et al.
172. Do new bike lanes impact air pollution exposure for cyclists?—a case study from Berlin S. Schmitz et al.
173. Impact of Outdoor Air Pollution on Indoor Air Quality in Low-Income Homes during Wildfire Seasons P. Shrestha et al.
174. Development of an Integrated Micro-Environmental Monitoring System for Construction Sites M. Wong et al.
175. A Perspective on Indoor Air Quality Monitoring, Guidelines, and the Use of Various Sensors F. Amin Beigh et al.
176. A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments B. Maag et al.
177. An Improved Sensor Calibration with Anomaly Detection and Removal X. Fang & I. Bate
178. End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring A. Rai et al.
179. Gas sensing properties of (MoO3)0.4(V2O5)0.6 microsheets: Effect of Pd sensitization A. Mane et al.
180. A Variational Bayesian Blind Calibration Approach for Air Quality Sensor Deployments G. Li et al.
181. Estimating personal exposures from a multi-hazard sensor network C. Zuidema et al.
182. Development of low-cost air quality stations for next-generation monitoring networks: calibration and validation of NO2 and O3 sensors A. Cavaliere et al.
183. Development of Air Quality Boxes Based on Low-Cost Sensor Technology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring P. Gäbel et al.
184. Data Quality in IoT-Based Air Quality Monitoring Systems: a Systematic Mapping Study J. Buelvas et al.
185. Quantifying Neighborhood-Scale Spatial Variations of Ozone at Open Space and Urban Sites in Boulder, Colorado Using Low-Cost Sensor Technology L. Cheadle et al.
186. Reducing the destructive effect of ambient humidity variations on gas detection capability of a temperature modulated gas sensor by calcium chloride H. Mahdavi et al.
187. Characterization of a commercial lower-cost medium-precision non-dispersive infrared sensor for atmospheric CO2 monitoring in urban areas E. Arzoumanian et al.
188. A Decentralized Bayesian Algorithm For Distributed Compressive Sensing in Networked Sensing Systems W. Chen & I. Wassell
189. Community-Based Health and Exposure Study around Urban Oil Developments in South Los Angeles B. Shamasunder et al.
190. Multinational prediction of household and personal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the PURE cohort study M. Shupler et al.
191. Comparing Building and Neighborhood-Scale Variability of CO2 and O3 to Inform Deployment Considerations for Low-Cost Sensor System Use A. Collier-Oxandale et al.
192. Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? N. Castell et al.
193. A Kalman Filter Scheme for the Optimization of Low-Cost Gas Sensor Measurements I. Christakis et al.
194. Statistical field calibration of a low-cost PM2.5 monitoring network in Baltimore A. Datta et al.