Articles | Volume 7, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3325-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3325-2014
Research article
 | 
07 Oct 2014
Research article |  | 07 Oct 2014

The next generation of low-cost personal air quality sensors for quantitative exposure monitoring

R. Piedrahita, Y. Xiang, N. Masson, J. Ortega, A. Collier, Y. Jiang, K. Li, R. P. Dick, Q. Lv, M. Hannigan, and L. Shang

Related authors

OH, HO2, and RO2 radical chemistry in a rural forest environment: measurements, model comparisons, and evidence of a missing radical sink
Brandon Bottorff, Michelle M. Lew, Youngjun Woo, Pamela Rickly, Matthew D. Rollings, Benjamin Deming, Daniel C. Anderson, Ezra Wood, Hariprasad D. Alwe, Dylan B. Millet, Andrew Weinheimer, Geoff Tyndall, John Ortega, Sebastien Dusanter, Thierry Leonardis, James Flynn, Matt Erickson, Sergio Alvarez, Jean C. Rivera-Rios, Joshua D. Shutter, Frank Keutsch, Detlev Helmig, Wei Wang, Hannah M. Allen, Johnathan H. Slade, Paul B. Shepson, Steven Bertman, and Philip S. Stevens
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10287–10311, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10287-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10287-2023, 2023
Short summary
Volatile organic compound emissions from solvent- and water-borne coatings – compositional differences and tracer compound identifications
Chelsea E. Stockwell, Matthew M. Coggon, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, John Ortega, Brian C. McDonald, Jeff Peischl, Kenneth Aikin, Jessica B. Gilman, Michael Trainer, and Carsten Warneke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6005–6022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6005-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6005-2021, 2021
Short summary
Comparisons of urban and rural PM10−2.5 and PM2.5 mass concentrations and semi-volatile fractions in northeastern Colorado
Nicholas Clements, Michael P. Hannigan, Shelly L. Miller, Jennifer L. Peel, and Jana B. Milford
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7469–7484, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7469-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7469-2016, 2016
Short summary
Development and validation of inexpensive, automated, dynamic flux chambers
B. B. Almand-Hunter, J. T. Walker, N. P. Masson, L. Hafford, and M. P. Hannigan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 267–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-267-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-267-2015, 2015
Positive matrix factorization of PM2.5 – eliminating the effects of gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds
M. Xie, K. C. Barsanti, M. P. Hannigan, S. J. Dutton, and S. Vedal
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7381–7393, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7381-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7381-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Drone CO2 measurements during the Tajogaite volcanic eruption
John Ericksen, Tobias P. Fischer, G. Matthew Fricke, Scott Nowicki, Nemesio M. Pérez, Pedro Hernández Pérez, Eleazar Padrón González, and Melanie E. Moses
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4725–4736, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4725-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4725-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-decadal atmospheric carbon dioxide measurements in Hungary, central Europe
László Haszpra
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4629–4647, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4629-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4629-2024, 2024
Short summary
Reliable water vapour isotopic composition measurements at low humidity using frequency-stabilised cavity ring-down spectroscopy
Mathieu Casado, Amaelle Landais, Tim Stoltmann, Justin Chaillot, Mathieu Daëron, Fréderic Prié, Baptiste Bordet, and Samir Kassi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4599–4612, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4599-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4599-2024, 2024
Short summary
A measurement system for CO2 and CH4 emissions quantification of industrial sites using a new in situ concentration sensor operated on board uncrewed aircraft vehicles
Jean-Louis Bonne, Ludovic Donnat, Grégory Albora, Jérémie Burgalat, Nicolas Chauvin, Delphine Combaz, Julien Cousin, Thomas Decarpenterie, Olivier Duclaux, Nicolas Dumelié, Nicolas Galas, Catherine Juery, Florian Parent, Florent Pineau, Abel Maunoury, Olivier Ventre, Marie-France Bénassy, and Lilian Joly
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4471–4491, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4471-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4471-2024, 2024
Short summary
Using metal oxide gas sensors to estimate the emission rates and locations of methane leaks in an industrial site: assessment with controlled methane releases
Rodrigo Rivera-Martinez, Pramod Kumar, Olivier Laurent, Gregoire Broquet, Christopher Caldow, Ford Cropley, Diego Santaren, Adil Shah, Cécile Mallet, Michel Ramonet, Leonard Rivier, Catherine Juery, Olivier Duclaux, Caroline Bouchet, Elisa Allegrini, Hervé Utard, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4257–4290, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4257-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4257-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alphasense: O3-B4 Ozone Sensor Technical Specification, available at: http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/O3B4.pdf (last access: 20 August 2014), 2013a.
Alphasense: NO2-B4 Ozone Sensor Technical Specification, available at: http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/NO2B4.pdf, 2013b.
Barsan, N. and Weimar, U.: Conduction model of metal oxide gas sensors, J. Electroceram., 7, 143–167, 2001.
Bourgeois, W., Romain, A. C., Nicolas, J., and Stuetz, R. M.: The use of sensor arrays for environmental monitoring: interests and limitations, J. Environ. Monitor., 5, 852–860, 2003.
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Annual Data Report: available at: http://www.colorado.gov/airquality/tech_doc_repository.aspx (last access: 29 September 2014), 2012.
Download