Articles | Volume 7, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3325-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3325-2014
Research article
 | 
07 Oct 2014
Research article |  | 07 Oct 2014

The next generation of low-cost personal air quality sensors for quantitative exposure monitoring

R. Piedrahita, Y. Xiang, N. Masson, J. Ortega, A. Collier, Y. Jiang, K. Li, R. P. Dick, Q. Lv, M. Hannigan, and L. Shang

Related authors

OH, HO2, and RO2 radical chemistry in a rural forest environment: measurements, model comparisons, and evidence of a missing radical sink
Brandon Bottorff, Michelle M. Lew, Youngjun Woo, Pamela Rickly, Matthew D. Rollings, Benjamin Deming, Daniel C. Anderson, Ezra Wood, Hariprasad D. Alwe, Dylan B. Millet, Andrew Weinheimer, Geoff Tyndall, John Ortega, Sebastien Dusanter, Thierry Leonardis, James Flynn, Matt Erickson, Sergio Alvarez, Jean C. Rivera-Rios, Joshua D. Shutter, Frank Keutsch, Detlev Helmig, Wei Wang, Hannah M. Allen, Johnathan H. Slade, Paul B. Shepson, Steven Bertman, and Philip S. Stevens
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10287–10311, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10287-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10287-2023, 2023
Short summary
Volatile organic compound emissions from solvent- and water-borne coatings – compositional differences and tracer compound identifications
Chelsea E. Stockwell, Matthew M. Coggon, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, John Ortega, Brian C. McDonald, Jeff Peischl, Kenneth Aikin, Jessica B. Gilman, Michael Trainer, and Carsten Warneke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6005–6022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6005-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6005-2021, 2021
Short summary
Comparisons of urban and rural PM10−2.5 and PM2.5 mass concentrations and semi-volatile fractions in northeastern Colorado
Nicholas Clements, Michael P. Hannigan, Shelly L. Miller, Jennifer L. Peel, and Jana B. Milford
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7469–7484, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7469-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7469-2016, 2016
Short summary
Development and validation of inexpensive, automated, dynamic flux chambers
B. B. Almand-Hunter, J. T. Walker, N. P. Masson, L. Hafford, and M. P. Hannigan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 267–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-267-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-267-2015, 2015
Positive matrix factorization of PM2.5 – eliminating the effects of gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds
M. Xie, K. C. Barsanti, M. P. Hannigan, S. J. Dutton, and S. Vedal
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7381–7393, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7381-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7381-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Deployment and evaluation of an NH4+∕ H3O+ reagent ion switching chemical ionization mass spectrometer for the detection of reduced and oxygenated gas-phase organic compounds
Cort L. Zang and Megan D. Willis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 17–35, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-17-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-17-2025, 2025
Short summary
An economical tunable diode laser spectrometer for fast-response measurements of water vapor in the atmospheric boundary layer
Emily D. Wein, Lars E. Kalnajs, and Darin W. Toohey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7097–7107, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7097-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7097-2024, 2024
Short summary
Eddy covariance with slow-response greenhouse gas analysers on tall towers: bridging atmospheric and ecosystem greenhouse gas networks
Pedro Henrique Herig Coimbra, Benjamin Loubet, Olivier Laurent, Laura Bignotti, Mathis Lozano, and Michel Ramonet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6625–6645, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6625-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6625-2024, 2024
Short summary
An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations
Kristen Okorn and Laura T. Iraci
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6425–6457, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multiphysical description of atmospheric pressure interface chemical ionisation in MION2 and Eisele type inlets
Henning Finkenzeller, Jyri Mikkilä, Cecilia Righi, Paxton Juuti, Mikko Sipilä, Matti Rissanen, Douglas Worsnop, Aleksei Shcherbinin, Nina Sarnela, and Juha Kangasluoma
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5989–6001, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5989-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5989-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alphasense: O3-B4 Ozone Sensor Technical Specification, available at: http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/O3B4.pdf (last access: 20 August 2014), 2013a.
Alphasense: NO2-B4 Ozone Sensor Technical Specification, available at: http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/NO2B4.pdf, 2013b.
Barsan, N. and Weimar, U.: Conduction model of metal oxide gas sensors, J. Electroceram., 7, 143–167, 2001.
Bourgeois, W., Romain, A. C., Nicolas, J., and Stuetz, R. M.: The use of sensor arrays for environmental monitoring: interests and limitations, J. Environ. Monitor., 5, 852–860, 2003.
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Annual Data Report: available at: http://www.colorado.gov/airquality/tech_doc_repository.aspx (last access: 29 September 2014), 2012.
Download