Articles | Volume 8, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2207-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2207-2015
Research article
 | 
29 May 2015
Research article |  | 29 May 2015

Ceilometer aerosol profiling versus Raman lidar in the frame of the INTERACT campaign of ACTRIS

F. Madonna, F. Amato, J. Vande Hey, and G. Pappalardo

Viewed

Total article views: 4,368 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,052 2,038 278 4,368 127 131
  • HTML: 2,052
  • PDF: 2,038
  • XML: 278
  • Total: 4,368
  • BibTeX: 127
  • EndNote: 131
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Dec 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Dec 2014)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 26 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
This work is the first time that three different commercial ceilometers with an advanced Raman lidar are compared over a period of 6 months. The comparison of the attenuated backscatter profiles from a multi-wavelength Raman lidar and three ceilometers (CHM15k, CS135s, CT25K) reveals differences due to the expected discrepancy in the SNR, but also due to effect of changes in the ambient temperature on the stability of ceilometer calibration over short and mid-term.