Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 8, issue 12
Articles | Volume 8, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5039-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5039-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 8, issue 12
Research article
 | 
02 Dec 2015
Research article |  | 02 Dec 2015

Metrology of ground-based satellite validation: co-location mismatch and smoothing issues of total ozone comparisons

T. Verhoelst, J. Granville, F. Hendrick, U. Köhler, C. Lerot, J.-P. Pommereau, A. Redondas, M. Van Roozendael, and J.-C. Lambert

Viewed

Total article views: 5,365 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,108 2,088 169 5,365 192 215
  • HTML: 3,108
  • PDF: 2,088
  • XML: 169
  • Total: 5,365
  • BibTeX: 192
  • EndNote: 215
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Aug 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Aug 2015)
Latest update: 07 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Comparisons between satellite and ground-based measurements of the atmosphere are inevitably affected by natural variability due to mismatches in spatial and temporal co-location. These additional terms in the comparison error budget are quantified here for total ozone column comparisons using an Observing System Simulation Experiment. Even when using tight co-location criteria, atmospheric variability is found to impact the comparisons significantly.
Read more
Share
Special issue
GOME-2: calibration, algorithms, data products and...