Articles | Volume 8, issue 12
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5039–5062, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5039-2015

Special issue: GOME-2: calibration, algorithms, data products and...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5039–5062, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5039-2015
Research article
02 Dec 2015
Research article | 02 Dec 2015

Metrology of ground-based satellite validation: co-location mismatch and smoothing issues of total ozone comparisons

T. Verhoelst et al.

Related authors

Characterization of Errors in Satellite-based HCHO / NO2 Tropospheric Column Ratios with Respect to Chemistry, Column to PBL Translation, Spatial Representation, and Retrieval Uncertainties
Amir H. Souri, Matthew S. Johnson, Glenn M. Wolfe, James H. Crawford, Alan Fried, Armin Wisthaler, William H. Brune, Donald R. Blake, Andrew J. Weinheimer, Tijl Verhoelst, Steven Compernolle, Gaia Pinardi, Corinne Vigouroux, Bavo Langerock, Sungyeon Choi, Lok Lamsal, Lei Zhu, Shuai Sun, Ronald C. Cohen, Kyung-Eun Min, Changmin Cho, Sajeev Philip, Xiong Liu, and Kelly Chance
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-410,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-410, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Air quality impacts of COVID-19 lockdown measures detected from space using high spatial resolution observations of multiple trace gases from Sentinel-5P/TROPOMI
Pieternel F. Levelt, Deborah C. Stein Zweers, Ilse Aben, Maite Bauwens, Tobias Borsdorff, Isabelle De Smedt, Henk J. Eskes, Christophe Lerot, Diego G. Loyola, Fabian Romahn, Trissevgeni Stavrakou, Nicolas Theys, Michel Van Roozendael, J. Pepijn Veefkind, and Tijl Verhoelst
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10319–10351, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10319-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10319-2022, 2022
Short summary
Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO2 retrieval: impact of version v2.2 improvements and comparisons with OMI and ground-based data
Jos van Geffen, Henk Eskes, Steven Compernolle, Gaia Pinardi, Tijl Verhoelst, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Maarten Sneep, Mark ter Linden, Antje Ludewig, K. Folkert Boersma, and J. Pepijn Veefkind
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2037–2060, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2037-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2037-2022, 2022
Short summary
TROPOMI tropospheric ozone column data: geophysical assessment and comparison to ozonesondes, GOME-2B and OMI
Daan Hubert, Klaus-Peter Heue, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Tijl Verhoelst, Marc Allaart, Steven Compernolle, Patrick D. Cullis, Angelika Dehn, Christian Félix, Bryan J. Johnson, Arno Keppens, Debra E. Kollonige, Christophe Lerot, Diego Loyola, Matakite Maata, Sukarni Mitro, Maznorizan Mohamad, Ankie Piters, Fabian Romahn, Henry B. Selkirk, Francisco R. da Silva, Ryan M. Stauffer, Anne M. Thompson, J. Pepijn Veefkind, Holger Vömel, Jacquelyn C. Witte, and Claus Zehner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7405–7433, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7405-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7405-2021, 2021
Short summary
Validation of the Sentinel-5 Precursor TROPOMI cloud data with Cloudnet, Aura OMI O2–O2, MODIS, and Suomi-NPP VIIRS
Steven Compernolle, Athina Argyrouli, Ronny Lutz, Maarten Sneep, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Ann Mari Fjæraa, Daan Hubert, Arno Keppens, Diego Loyola, Ewan O'Connor, Fabian Romahn, Piet Stammes, Tijl Verhoelst, and Ping Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2451–2476, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2451-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2451-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Solar occultation measurement of mesospheric ozone by SAGE III/ISS: impact of variations along the line of sight caused by photochemistry
Murali Natarajan, Robert Damadeo, and David Flittner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 75–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-75-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-75-2023, 2023
Short summary
Understanding the potential of Sentinel-2 for monitoring methane point emissions
Javier Gorroño, Daniel J. Varon, Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate, and Luis Guanter
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 89–107, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-89-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-89-2023, 2023
Short summary
TROPOMI/S5P Total Column Water Vapor validation against AERONET ground-based measurements
Katerina Garane, Ka Lok Chan, Maria-Elissavet Koukouli, Diego Loyola, and Dimitris Balis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 57–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-57-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-57-2023, 2023
Short summary
Assessing the consistency of satellite-derived upper tropospheric humidity measurements
Lei Shi, Carl J. Schreck III, Viju O. John, Eui-Seok Chung, Theresa Lang, Stefan A. Buehler, and Brian J. Soden
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6949–6963, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6949-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6949-2022, 2022
Short summary
A comparison of carbon monoxide retrievals between the MOPITT satellite and Canadian high-Arctic ground-based NDACC and TCCON FTIR measurements
Ali Jalali, Kaley A. Walker, Kimberly Strong, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Merritt N. Deeter, Debra Wunch, Sébastien Roche, Tyler Wizenberg, Erik Lutsch, Erin McGee, Helen M. Worden, Pierre Fogal, and James R. Drummond
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6837–6863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Arnold Jr., C. P. and Dey, C. H.: Observing-systems simulation experiments: past, present, and future, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 67, 687–695, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1986)067<0687:OSSEPP>2.0.CO;2, 1986.
Balis, D., Kroon, M., Koukouli, M. E., Brinksma, E. J., Labow, G., Veefkind, J. P., and McPeters, R. D.: Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument total ozone column measurements using Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometer ground-based observations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S46, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008796, 2007.
Balis, D., Lambert, J.-C., Van Roozendael, M., Loyola, D., Spurr, R., Livschitz, Y., Valks, P., Amiridis, V., Gerard, P., and Granville, J.: Ten years of GOME/ERS-2 total ozone data – the new GOME Data Processor (GDP) Version 4: II Ground-based validation and comparisons with TOMS V7/V8, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D07307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006376, 2007b.
Bernhard, G., Evans, R. D., Labow, G. J., and Oltmans, S. J.: Bias in Dobson total ozone measurements at high latitudes due to approximations in calculations of ozone absorption coefficients and air mass, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D10305, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005559, 2005.
Bramstedt, K., Gleason, J., Loyola, D., Thomas, W., Bracher, A., Weber, M., and Burrows, J. P.: Comparison of total ozone from the satellite instruments GOME and TOMS with measurements from the Dobson network 1996–2000, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1409–1419, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1409-2003, 2003.
Download
Short summary
Comparisons between satellite and ground-based measurements of the atmosphere are inevitably affected by natural variability due to mismatches in spatial and temporal co-location. These additional terms in the comparison error budget are quantified here for total ozone column comparisons using an Observing System Simulation Experiment. Even when using tight co-location criteria, atmospheric variability is found to impact the comparisons significantly.